Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I completely agree that Rubio is not ready to be president. Perhaps we should first wait a bit and see if he actually does anything conservative?


3 posted on 02/13/2013 7:17:50 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenUSA

I was going to post something similar like, let’s wait to see if he is completely sanitized of his so-called conservatism before granting him the label and rushing to support his candidacy for Presidency.


6 posted on 02/13/2013 7:21:22 AM PST by zerosix (Native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA

But,but,millions of Hispanics will reject more free s***
to vote for Rubio.


8 posted on 02/13/2013 7:23:04 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA

For once Scarborough is right. Rubio is not ready to be POTUS but he still gave a good rebuttal to Obutt.


34 posted on 02/13/2013 10:00:56 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenUSA

Whether conservative enough to satisfy a lot of die-hard conservatives, is a question for which I have no opinion.

WHat I do know is that any congressional Republican who can stand up to Obama and not dance around his failures like most of them, who can actually speak in clear concise sentences and make his point - I’m looking for that.

Whatever Mitt may or may not be, he should have spoken the unvarnished truth about the Obama destruction of America. He was trying to be too polite, too nice - and nothing he said ever got thru to any libs, even the ones who weren’t crazy about Obama.

It was such a waste of a campaign. Any Republican running for office should be required to listen to the speeches of Ronald Reagan, especially when he was running against Carter. He states fact, but does not attack - but he is clear with everything he says about Carter’s attempted destruction of the US.

Mitt could have done that, if he wanted to and if he hadn’t been advised by imbeciles.


35 posted on 02/13/2013 10:08:27 AM PST by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson