Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EXCH54FE

Received recently:

February 12, 2013

Dear Mr. -———,

Thank you for contacting me to express your concern about calls for increased federal gun control in the wake of the unspeakable tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate the time you took to write to me, and while we may not agree completely on this issue, I welcome your thoughts on it.

Like you, I respect the U.S. Constitution as the foundation of our great democracy. The Framers supported the right of colonists to defend themselves against the British Empire, and at the time of the Second Amendment’s drafting, they were concerned that the absence of a “well-regulated militia” could jeopardize the entire American democratic experiment.

Our founding fathers never contemplated, however, whether the open availability of modern military hardware would be necessary to ensure individual liberty in the 21st century. High-capacity ammunition magazines, high-powered assault rifles, and even semi-automatic weapons had yet to be invented, so it now falls upon us to determine the place of modern, highly lethal weapons of war in civil society.

The right of responsible citizens to keep and bear arms must be carefully weighed against the right of all Americans to live in a safe society—and as such, responsible steps can and must be taken to protect the latter without infringing upon the former. Closing the “gun show” loophole, banning high-capacity ammunition magazines, and improving the system of background checks for gun purchasers will do nothing to infringe upon the right of citizens to keep and use firearms for recreational, subsistence, or even self-defense purposes.

Please know that while we may not agree on the effectiveness of particular gun control policies, I profoundly respect your views and will keep them in mind as Congress considers these matters.

If you have any other questions or comments, let me hear from you. I value what my constituents say to me, and I always need your thoughts and benefit from your ideas.

I’ve created an ongoing e-newsletter to keep constituents informed on a variety of congressional issues and legislation. Many constituents tell me how much they value reading it, and if you would like to as well, you can go to my website at http://eshoo.house.gov and click on Sign Up for ENews. Your email address will never be used by anyone except my office to communicate with you, and your tax dollars will be conserved by using electronic communications rather than traditional mailings.

Most gratefully,

Anna G. Eshoo
Member of Congress


5 posted on 02/13/2013 8:04:51 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sasquatch

Interesting interpretation of the 2nd. (completely wrong)


6 posted on 02/13/2013 8:07:06 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

I feel your pain. When I lived in California, Tom “Hit ‘n Run” Lantos was my Congresscritter. I wrote a letter to him back in ‘89 or ‘90 when the first “assault weapon” propaganda push started, and received a similar form letter basically telling me that he didn’t care about the 2nd Amendment.


7 posted on 02/13/2013 8:10:08 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

Anna is typical of the walking talking a$$hole POS that passes for a Congresswoman here in CA! She, like her RAT “compatriots” isl a disgrace to this once great state! BTW Anna was born in New Britain, CT. another liberal “transplant” who came here to crap in our nest! Just like Pelosi and many others.


9 posted on 02/13/2013 8:12:26 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

Is there a modern military that is limited to using semi-auto only rifles? There are restrictions on owning “modern military hardware”, both in cost and legal approvals.


10 posted on 02/13/2013 8:14:54 AM PST by Chipper (You can't kill an Obamazombie by destroying the brain...they didn't have one to begin with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

Dear Anna,
In 1787, freedom of speech was shouting at a town meeting or publishing your thoughts on paper or parchment using quill or printing press. The Framers never imagined television and cell phones, let alone texting, Facebook, and Twitter. So you just go ahead and write down your stupidity on dried sheep stomach using mashed berries and a turkey feather and then we will continue this discussion, okay?
Sincerely,
goodwithagun


12 posted on 02/13/2013 8:20:22 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch
>>> “... Our founding fathers never contemplated, however, whether the open availability of modern military hardware would be necessary to ensure individual liberty in the 21st century....”

That is because the founding fathers never contemplated the reality in the 21st century that we have a government tyranny and The People willingly let their government infringe on their rights to pursue individual liberty.

“Modern military hardware” and “high capacity assault magazines” are just there for distractions.

14 posted on 02/13/2013 8:29:22 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

Time to ECHEW Eshoo, among many others.


16 posted on 02/13/2013 8:39:33 AM PST by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

Time to ESCHEW Eshoo, among many others.


17 posted on 02/13/2013 8:40:06 AM PST by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch
Our founding fathers never contemplated, however, whether the open availability of modern military hardware would be necessary to ensure individual liberty in the 21st century.

They never contemplated a government as huge and as oppressive as the one we have now, either. They expected us to fight for our freedoms the day first day the politicians tried to rule over us. If they had envisioned the government we have today, the Constitution would have demanded every citizen be fully armed, and those arms would have to be more powerful than those controlled by the officials who are, right mow, trying to deny us our God given rights.

18 posted on 02/13/2013 8:41:41 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

From my Representative, Mario-Diaz Balart:

“I want to assure you that I will be vigilant in monitoring bills that may be harmful to the interests of law-abiding gun owners. I am a staunch proponent of the Second Amendment, which clearly protects our individual right to keep and bear arms. I believe gun control policies fail to recognize that criminals, not guns, are the root cause of crime and violence in America.”

Still waiting to hear from four Senators representing states where I own property and have many relatives. At least this response gives me some hope that facts, not emotion, may rule the day.


25 posted on 02/13/2013 9:32:23 AM PST by Boomer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sasquatch

So, she’d be OK with restricting freedom of speech and the press because the internet, radio, and TV weren’t even thought of at the time of the Framers?


33 posted on 02/13/2013 2:00:22 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson