Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two gun bills pass out of state House committee (CO)
The Gazette ^ | February 12, 2013 10:26 PM | MEGAN SCHRADER

Posted on 02/13/2013 9:22:38 AM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2013 9:22:47 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Why don’t some Republican representatives introduce bills placing limits on freedom of the press, since our Constitutional rights aren’t “absolute”? Two can play this game. If only our side would learn that.


2 posted on 02/13/2013 9:27:04 AM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Here’s my feeling....If you are licensed in one state, there should be a reciprocity between ALL states. The idea that I can’t protect myself at all times is absurd.


3 posted on 02/13/2013 9:29:58 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“The private sale loophole is just a way for criminals to skirt around our current background check and it contributes to the murder of 34 Americans every single day,” Fields said. “Background checks are the only systematic way to stop felons, domestic abusers and the seriously mentally ill and other abusers from buying firearms.”

Ms. Fields are you that ignorant? Criminal by definition do not follow the law. So you write a new law and you think they will all of a sudden obey laws? Mam you live in a fantasy world.


4 posted on 02/13/2013 9:31:43 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Rep. Rhonda Fields, D-Aurora, authored both bills and defended the measures against an onslaught of criticism from gun rights advocates who filled the committee chambers at the Capitol wearing stickers saying “I vote pro-gun.”

You can put lipstick on a Democrat and it's still a Democrat.


5 posted on 02/13/2013 9:33:12 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

“Why don’t some Republican representatives introduce bills placing limits on freedom of the press, since our Constitutional rights aren’t “absolute”? Two can play this game. If only our side would learn that.”

R’s made the argument in the hearing yesterday—Bob Gardner argued the Background check was like a prior restraint on speech. D’s ignored it.

If R’s introduced a bill about background checks for the press, it would be hooted down by everyone and the R’s would vote against it. It would be a stupid bill. Worse, the D’s might decide it was a good idea to filter out bloggers and just leave the captive media to do their bidding.


6 posted on 02/13/2013 9:34:08 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
My feeling is that licensing is an infringement and therefore unconstitutional. As are all of the laws proposed and most of the laws already passed. Not only are they unconstitutional, they don't do anything except infringe on the rights of those that don't break the law.
7 posted on 02/13/2013 9:34:46 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
My feeling is that licensing is an infringement and therefore unconstitutional. As are all of the laws proposed and most of the laws already passed. Not only are they unconstitutional, they don't do anything except infringe on the rights of those that don't break the law.
8 posted on 02/13/2013 9:34:56 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“The private sale loophole is just a way for criminals to skirt around our current background check and it contributes to the murder of 34 Americans every single day,” Fields said. “Background checks are the only systematic way to stop felons, domestic abusers and the seriously mentally ill and other abusers from buying firearms.”

Ms. Fields are you that ignorant? Criminal by definition do not follow the law. So you write a new law and you think they will all of a sudden obey laws? Mam you live in a fantasy world.


9 posted on 02/13/2013 9:36:19 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Photobucket
10 posted on 02/13/2013 9:39:09 AM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Of course I don’t mean seriously introduce such a bill, I mean introduce it to make the point, and point out that it’s ludicrous, just as laws restricting our 2A rights are ludicrous. The ‘rats use such ploys.

Anyway, are the antis really so ignorant that they believe people who have criminal intent are going to go through all the hoops to legally acquire and keep a gun, just to proceed with their criminal intent? I don’t think they are. I think they know full well that these are just means at chipping away, bit by bit, the 2A rights of law-abiding citizens. That’s the only people who will pay heed to all these laws.


11 posted on 02/13/2013 9:40:55 AM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Of course I don’t mean seriously introduce such a bill, I mean introduce it to make the point, and point out that it’s ludicrous, just as laws restricting our 2A rights are ludicrous. The ‘rats use such ploys.

Anyway, are the antis really so ignorant that they believe people who have criminal intent are going to go through all the hoops to legally acquire and keep a gun, just to proceed with their criminal intent? I don’t think they are. I think they know full well that these are just means at chipping away, bit by bit, the 2A rights of law-abiding citizens. That’s the only people who will pay heed to all these laws.


12 posted on 02/13/2013 9:40:55 AM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Durus

You’re proposing a lawless society...the Federal Constitution and State Constitutions say otherwise.


13 posted on 02/13/2013 9:51:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Funny. Denver is considering opting out of the marijuana laws because, get this, crime is up.

And now they want to take away the guns.

It just doesn’t get much better then that


14 posted on 02/13/2013 9:57:51 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (I own a weapon to protect my family from those wanting to take that weapon away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I believe AR-15s should be banned and M-16s made legal.

The AR-15 is designed to kill as any people as possible in a short time, so the politicians say.

The M-16 requires 250,000 rounds to make one kill.

Ok, this is sarcasm.


15 posted on 02/13/2013 10:00:51 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( Too old to cut the mustard any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Funny. Denver is considering opting out of the marijuana laws because, get this, crime is up.

Wow. And the law is not even in effect...

Don't suppose you have a link?

16 posted on 02/13/2013 10:03:49 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Hispanics make up 32% of the population. Maybe the cartels found a new base....and it’s all nice and legal.


17 posted on 02/13/2013 10:13:12 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Those bums in Denver are begging me to take my tax and investment dollars elsewhere.


18 posted on 02/13/2013 10:37:34 AM PST by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Born and raised in Colorado. Spent the first 34 years of my life there. Haven’t lived there in a decade. Went home last Christmas and I don’t even recognize the place or the people anymore. Definitely not the libertarian/conservative bent I grew up with. The place has been thoroughly Californicated.


19 posted on 02/13/2013 10:50:49 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“no constitutional rights are absolute and all are subject to reasonable restraint”

The face of tyranny. If there is no absolute RIGHT, then there are NO rights. The fascists consider a right to be any thing that the deem we MUST do. If it is not forbidden, it is mandated.

This comment is precisely why we have an UNALIENABLE right to overthrow despotic governments.


20 posted on 02/13/2013 11:37:30 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson