Posted on 02/14/2013 5:24:39 PM PST by george76
Obama with his “we can’t wait for Congress to act” ... there is one man who wields more power than Obama: CIA appointee John Brennan.
...
recently discovered that Brennan, running something akin to a fiefdom with his drone assassination program, has the power to decide who lives and who dies and doesn’t have to provide evidence to any entity that the “target” presents any threat to America—even if they are an American—even if the American is living in the United States
...
the United States, leading up to the 2011 Libyan civil war had been flooding Libya with literally millions of weapons. After the West—NATO, with Obama at the helm—decided to topple Gaddafi, these millions of weapons then fell into Al-Qaeda and associated groups’ hands. And what Team Obama wasn’t funneling to the Syrian rebels (what Benghazi: The Definitive Report calls an “open secret”)—they wanted to get back from groups such as Ansar al-Sharia. Brennan, throughout North Africa, had been conducting his secret JSOC wars against al-Qaeda and associated groups; and lo and behold, yes, Mr. Brennan, there was retaliation. And that retaliation resulted in the deaths of four Americans at the consulate in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11.
The whole Obama Benghazi cover-up was only partially about hiding the illegal funneling of Libyan weapons to Syria and was mainly about the real—but illegal—Commander-in-Chief John Brennan conducting secret wars in Libya—without approval from Congress, without approval from the Pentagon, and hidden even from the CIA, with only a behind-doors approval by Barack Hussein Obama.
...
Benghazi: The Definitive Report makes it clear that when the Benghazi consulate was attacked and requested help, the CIA annex was told to stand down. They were ordered to stand idly by while Americans were slaughtered. They refused.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
OBAMA KNEW
OBAMA KNEW
Right, like the Republicans would have done anything about it.
There's always "going viral," and the effect is not to be underestimated in a close election.
It is best to dispense with the cynicism and exercise what "self-government" is really about, as the expectation of reliance upon a political party blinds one to taking advantage of real opportunities.
“Circumventing the orders and authority of the Commander In Chief in this manner is treason”
1) No, it isn’t. Please cite the Constitution or US Code if you disagree.
2) The “authority” to wage war in Libya OR Syria is not granted to Obama in Article II, or anywhere else.
“Circumventing the orders and authority of the Commander In Chief in this manner is treason”
1) No, it isn’t. Please cite the Constitution or US Code if you disagree.
2) The “authority” to wage war in Libya OR Syria is not granted to Obama in Article II, or anywhere else.
“Circumventing the orders and authority of the Commander In Chief in this manner is treason”
1) No, it isn’t. Please cite the Constitution or US Code if you disagree.
2) The “authority” to wage war in Libya OR Syria is not granted to Obama in Article II, or anywhere else.
Oh boy. This is the kind of argument that can tie people up for forever. Is it a war? Do the same rules apply to the Authorization to Use Military Force? People get paid big money to argue over these things. You aren’t paying me to argue about this, and nobody else has stepped up to offer to pay me. If I make a statement, you want me to cite my references. You don’t. It is incumbent upon you to cite your references if you are going to disagree with me. “No, it isn’t” provides no citations. You want to argue about something I wrote nine days ago? Why? I believe that Brennan’s actions have aided and abetted the enemies of The United States. “No, it isn’t” hasn’t changed my mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.