Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrea Mitchell: I Share Same 'Concern' As Obama Admin—Hagel Won't Get Vote
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 02/15/2013 11:35:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

Andrea Mitchell/Barack Obama: same struggle! In an stunningly blatant display of solidarity with the Obama line, Andrea Mitchell declared on today's Morning Joe that she shared the same "concern" with the White House: that poor Chuck Hagel wouldn't get a final vote on his nomination.

Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--and Senator Ted Cruz in particular--for supposedly attacking Hagel with allegations "completely unsupported by fact." Could somebody please tell me why Mitchell, supposedly a reporter, should so shamelessly be toting the White House's water this way?

View the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andreamitchell; barackobama; chuckhagel; msm

1 posted on 02/15/2013 11:35:40 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Even to a jaded old MSM watcher like me, this degree of open support by Andrea Mitchell for the Obama line is shocking/sickening. Ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 02/15/2013 11:38:04 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

So what Andrea Mitchell is saying is that his struggle is my struggle.


3 posted on 02/15/2013 11:39:03 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

The only struggle SHE has is with objectivity.


4 posted on 02/15/2013 11:40:11 AM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It’s astonishing that Mrs. Alan Greenspan is so blatant in her bias, but that’s what NBC pays her for. And she needs the cash for her monthly face lift.


5 posted on 02/15/2013 11:40:44 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

And the mirror


6 posted on 02/15/2013 11:41:45 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
In an stunningly blatant display of solidarity with the Obama line, Andrea Mitchell declared ...

How could anyone be stunned by this? The Obama media in general, and Andrea Greenspan in particular, have dropped any pretense of objectivity. Even some of the brighter of the low information voters get that.

The Obama administration has their own, completely controlled, media arm. If Democrats had any intelligence, or any shred of morals, they'd be horrified at what the lack of media scrutiny of the current president is doing to the republic.

For that reason, I hate media members with an uncommon passion.
7 posted on 02/15/2013 11:43:06 AM PST by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

If Republicans had any spine, they’d tell Dingbat Harry that he’ll get a vote on Hagel as soon as he allows a vote on a budget.


8 posted on 02/15/2013 11:45:20 AM PST by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Mitchell is senile.


9 posted on 02/15/2013 11:45:37 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

About 15 years ago, I met her and her husband (and hubby’s bodyguard) on an Amtrak to NYC. We small-talked for a few sentences, and she was pleasant, he would not look at me. Her face is terribly pock-marked; I felt sorry for her (for a moment). But, she did have a tight little bod back then, and great legs. I report, you decide.


10 posted on 02/15/2013 11:58:57 AM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

So is Greenspan, and has been for at least 12 years.

He of the “print money to pay for everything” camp.


11 posted on 02/15/2013 12:05:00 PM PST by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2988920/posts


12 posted on 02/15/2013 12:18:30 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Andrea Mitchell declared on today's Morning Joe that she shared the same "concern" with the White House: that poor Chuck Hagel Robert Bork wouldn't get a final vote on his nomination. Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--and Senator Ted Cruz Kennedy in particular--for supposedly attacking Hagel Bork with allegations "completely unsupported by fact."

(Imagine there are media).

13 posted on 02/15/2013 12:27:22 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Erratum: that should say ‘jackasses’ instead of ‘Republicans’.


14 posted on 02/15/2013 12:29:02 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

15 posted on 02/15/2013 1:21:32 PM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Ye gads...this woman is 66. Go away. Retire. Please.


16 posted on 02/15/2013 1:26:17 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Because she won’t or can’t think for herself.

She sold her soul to the devil.


17 posted on 02/15/2013 1:30:37 PM PST by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--for supposedly attacking Hagel with allegations "completely unsupported by fact.

I don't know why she is acting so shocked. 99% of her news stories are the same way.

18 posted on 02/15/2013 2:06:00 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Heh heh...


19 posted on 02/15/2013 3:26:13 PM PST by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Why should she care?

Just report the news, B####!


20 posted on 02/15/2013 3:44:53 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

BOTH of them are Sad Sacks.


21 posted on 02/15/2013 3:48:23 PM PST by Ann Archy (ABORTION........the HUMAN sacrifice to the god of CONVENIENCE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Ha! Good one :)


22 posted on 02/15/2013 3:54:05 PM PST by EnquiringMind (th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

66? Come on — really? Wow, she looks bad. I would’ve guessed 70s.


23 posted on 02/15/2013 4:01:13 PM PST by EnquiringMind (th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
 photo msnbc-1-1-1.jpg
24 posted on 02/15/2013 4:12:10 PM PST by timestax (AMERICAN MEDIA= DOMESTIC ENEMY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo HAHA.jpg

25 posted on 02/15/2013 4:14:05 PM PST by timestax (AMERICAN MEDIA= DOMESTIC ENEMY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

89-10.

This whole thing is a goon show, and that’s all it is. There is no resistance to “Obama” in the Senate.


26 posted on 02/18/2013 10:10:08 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson