Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Very Junior Senator’s Bomb-Throwing Debut (Ted Cruz)
New York Times ^ | February 15, 2013 | JONATHAN WEISMAN

Posted on 02/15/2013 12:58:46 PM PST by reaganaut1

WASHINGTON — As the Senate edged toward a nasty filibuster vote on Chuck Hagel’s nomination to be defense secretary, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, sat silent and satisfied in the corner of the chamber — his voice robbed by laryngitis — as he absorbed what he had wrought in his mere seven weeks of Senate service.

Mr. Hagel, a former senator from Mr. Cruz’s own party, was about to be the victim of the first filibuster of a nominee to lead the Pentagon. The blockade was due in no small part to the very junior senator’s relentless pursuit of speeches, financial records or any other documents with Mr. Hagel’s name on them going back at least five years. Some Republicans praised the work of the brash newcomer, but others joined Democrats in saying that Mr. Cruz had gone too far.

Without naming names, Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a biting label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism.

“It was really reminiscent of a different time and place, when you said, ‘I have here in my pocket a speech you made on such and such a date,’ and, of course, nothing was in the pocket,” she said, a reference to Senator Joseph R. McCarthy’s bloody pursuit of communists in the 1950s. “It was reminiscent of some bad times.”

In just two months, Mr. Cruz, 42, has made his presence felt in an institution where new arrivals are usually not heard from for months, if not years. Besides suggesting that Mr. Hagel might have received compensation from foreign enemies, he has tangled with the mayor of Chicago, sandbagged the Senate’s third-ranking Democrat on national television, voted against virtually everything before him

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: reaganaut1

TIME mag called Rubio the savior of the party, they mock Rubio, but the MSM is savaging Cruz now. He be too uppity.

lol


41 posted on 02/15/2013 2:16:02 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The blockade was due in no small part to the very junior senator’s relentless pursuit of speeches, financial records or any other documents with Mr. Hagel’s name on them going back at least five years.

It sounds like he takes his job seriously. Go, Cruz!

42 posted on 02/15/2013 2:16:28 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Since his father fled Cuba he probably was no longer a citizen of Cuba and do you know if simply being born in Canada makes you a Canadian citizen?

Very few if any countries other than the US make you a citizen simply because you are born there as far as I know.


43 posted on 02/15/2013 2:28:11 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Give us more of the same, Ted. Maybe even use real bombs.


44 posted on 02/15/2013 2:30:26 PM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
In just two months, Mr. Cruz, 42, has made his presence felt in an institution where new arrivals are usually not heard from for months, if not years. Besides suggesting that Mr. Hagel might have received compensation from foreign enemies, he has tangled with the mayor of Chicago, sandbagged the Senate’s third-ranking Democrat on national television, voted against virtually everything before him

Ted Cruz, doing the job nearly everybody in the Senate is afraid to do.

Go Senator Cruz!

45 posted on 02/15/2013 3:19:58 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
label for the Texan’s accusatory crusade: McCarthyism.

McCarthy turned out to be much more right than wrong. Sen. Cruz, wear the label proudly sir and keep sticking to the shameful LIBERALS every chance you get.

Too bad he was born in Canada ...

So what, the worst liar in chief Obama was born in Indonesia and America didn't seem to care. Right?!

46 posted on 02/15/2013 5:19:29 PM PST by Ron H. (Hussein Obama, the 21st century American Balkanizer - 'Yes I Can')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

dudgeon. Rhymes with curmudgeon, which is kinda cool.


47 posted on 02/15/2013 6:37:45 PM PST by pluvmantelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

I dare not keyboard what I am thinking might be needed to save the USA, as we once knew it.

I am sick, thinking about the next few years, and the trouble we are in as a nation, and how doomed we might be.

But, I remember the unusual tactics taken by the heroes in our early American revolution against the oppressive British, and then, the unique talents of an American hero, Chris Stevens (may he rest in peace).

Does there come a time when free men have to defeat the tyrannical enemies in their midst (even if elected), find a way to demoralize them, silence them, and make “redistributionists” fear conservatives?

The “redistributionalists/socialists/communists” are doing their best to convince the “mass body-politic” to fear conservatives and constitutionalists, making these out to be “justifiable” targets of state-sanctioned violence. Who doubts that will eventually lead to violence!

Violence is horrible, unless it is in self-defense. It is easy to understand the need to defend home and family, but how are we to defend our Republic and Constitution, preserve our rights and freedoms, when these are usurped and distorted by those who get elected by “selling to the illiterati” silly and unworkable notions of how society should operate?

Loyal Americans prefer the ballot box, of course. But... if a time comes when that fails, because of bribes, lobbying, selling of votes, promises and pandering to those who would take from the productive to give to the unproductive, then what do the productive do?

Unconventional warfare might be the only alternative, and it makes me so sad.

But, if it (violence) discourages those “elected” who have no loyalty to their oath to uphold and defend our Republic, who demand voting for a descent into socialism, then communism, might it be a horror we will have to endure, if our republic is to survive?

I have no answers, only worries, questions, and wondering. I never thought we would sink so low as we have in the past decade.

To think I was once shocked and disgusted by Clinton’s lying under oath. Since his disgusting time in office, we have deteriorated even farther, totally losing the culture we once knew, and now are dominated and taken over by the radical left, and the leftist media.

And now they join in with demand to take our guns away? Who will protect them, when they figure out this isn’t a game, and they have been used?

For the record, I am an old grandma, and have no guns, do not know how to shoot one, but totally support the right of others to protect me. I hope a neighbor of mine will come to my defense, if needed.


48 posted on 02/15/2013 10:05:32 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson