Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grilled about Cayman Investments, Jack Lew Chooses the Iím-a-Moron Defense ^ | February 16, 2013 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 02/16/2013 9:37:59 AM PST by Kaslin

Every so often, you get a “teaching moment” in Washington, and we now have an excellent opportunity to educate lawmakers about the “offshore” world because President Obama’s nominee to be Treasury Secretary has been caught with his hand in the tax haven cookie jar.

Mr. Lew not only invested some of his own money in a Cayman-based fund, he also was in charge of a Citi Bank division that had over 100 Cayman-domiciled funds.

As you can imagine, Republicans are having some fun with this issue.

Mitt Romney was subjected to a lot of class-warfare demagoguery during the 2012 campaign because he also invested  some of his wealth in a Cayman fund, so GOPers are hoisting Lew on a petard and grilling him about the obvious hypocrisy of a leftist utilizing – both personally and professionally – a jurisdiction that commits the unforgivable crime of not imposing income tax.

In a sensible world, Lew would say what everyone in the financial world already understands, which is that the Cayman Islands are an excellent, fully legal, tax-neutral platform for investment funds because 1) there’s no added layer of tax, 2) there’s good rule of law, and, 3) foreigners can invest in the American economy without creating any nexus with the IRS.

But we don’t live in a sensible world, so Lew instead wants us to believe he’s a moron and that he didn’t realize that funds were domiciled in Cayman.

And I guess all the other wealthy leftists with offshore-based investments probably think that as well, right?

Anyhow, I’m taking a glass-half-full perspective on this kerfuffle since it gives me an opportunity to educate more people about why tax havens are a liberalizing and positive force in the global economy.

Oh, what about Lew as Treasury Secretary? Well, as I explain for Real News, he’s competent but misguided.

In other words, the chances of any good reform in the next four years are asymptotically approaching zero. Based on his background (and also based on the views of the President he’ll be serving), it’s virtually impossible to envision good entitlement reform, pro-growth tax reform, and any changes to lessen the likelihood of future Greek-style fiscal collapse (as amusingly illustrated by this cartoon).

So with any luck, they’ll be some tax havens around that the rest of us can utilize when that day of reckoning occurs.

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: caymanislands; hypocrite; jacklew

1 posted on 02/16/2013 9:38:05 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The US government and legal system is moving towards totalitarianism. Seemingly slowly right now, but it’s moving in that direction. The leadership is mostly idiots.

2 posted on 02/16/2013 10:21:11 AM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A self described moron should NOT be running the Treasury. Wake up you voting morons in the Senate and do not confirm him. We already had a tax cheat for four years and look where we are now!

3 posted on 02/16/2013 12:18:50 PM PST by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

....the same defense that stood Tim Turbo Tax Geithner in good stead.

4 posted on 02/16/2013 12:19:36 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Amazing how the “smartest guy in the room” turns dumber than dirt when testifying....

Maybe it depends on what the meaning of “is” is ?

5 posted on 02/16/2013 12:26:10 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

The thing I would now wonder about...who exactly in the White House reviews the folks who they send up for nominations? They had to know something about his Cayman Island connection, and just thought the stupid senators would never figure the connection? I don’t get it. There are forty-odd professors from various university positions that would have at least been clean and unconnected to anything, and show some knowledge over the economy.

6 posted on 02/16/2013 6:06:31 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson