/Catherine%20Zeta%20Jones/catherine-zeta-jones-32a.jpg)
Now what did MOdo have to say again?
You know what? I’m tired of this inside joke. Even though the article in the NYT is by dingbat Mo Dowd it has a decent point. And that is what our comments should be about.
The article would actually be meaningful if Dowd applied it to the revisionist history that the left has been pushing on us for the last 50 years. Maybe Dowd could come clean and tell the world via her column that it was actually Democrats who fought against Civil Rights while it was Republicans who defended them. The fact that Dowd limits her indignation for select Hollywood movies shows that she is not to be taken seriously, no matter how valid her select point is in this case. When she writes a column about how Obama’s so-called ‘stimulus’ bill actually caused more harm than good, maybe then we can discuss the merits of her points rather than fall for her selective BS.
Now what did MOdo have to say again?
Yeah, like the 220 pp. SI swimsuit edition—great articles! All four of ‘em ...
It’s not an inside joke exactly. The story is that MoDo compulsively searches media for any mention of her name. When she pulls up this thread she’ll get pictures of KZ-J who got between Michael Douglas and MoDo. It’s sort of a thumb in the eye for this leftist hag.
You are entitled to your opinion, though I believe it to be the minority opinion in this case.