Skip to comments.Another Trip Into the Recesses of the Liberal Mind
Posted on 02/22/2013 2:24:16 PM PST by Kaslin
Sit down. Im truly sorry about this, but we really need to take another trip into the dark recesses of the liberal mind. A dangerous journey to a world where it is greedy to want to keep your own money, but not to covet the money or property of others; a world where earning 17% of the income, but paying 38% of the income taxes means youre not paying your fair share; a world where any expression of disagreement with any utterance, no matter how ignorant, from the mouth of someone-not-white makes you a racist.
We have to do this because you really do need to understand the extent of mindless irrationality that liberals present to us as a thinking process.
Our liberal du jour here is one Jennifer Brooks. Shes a member of some crowd called the Corporation for Enterprise Development. Look them up. It seems that their goal in life is to enrich the poor and the middle class at the expense of those who have been more responsible with their lives. An opinion piece by Brooks was published in yesterdays Atlanta Journal Constitution. Heres your link, if you need to catch up on your self-abuse regimen.
Brooks piece was titled: A path to prosperity: allow more to save. In her column Brooks says that more than half of Georgias residents dont have enough money saved up to get them through a rough time. She thinks that the government needs to do something to help these people save money. And --- wouldnt you know it? --- she thinks that the best way to help these people is to take money away from those whove earned it and give it to them.
Hold on tunneling a little deeper into the liberal mind here.
First, the lovely Jennifer suggests that people who actually go to college, buy a home and save for retirement are able to do so because they either inherited money or their family supported them. Nowhere not one word in her piece does Brooks acknowledge that perhaps these people managed to go to college, buy a home and become successful through hard work and good decision-making. The liberal mind cannot acknowledge that possibility! These rich people either inherited their money, or some family member paid the tab! Here Brooks sets the class warfare table. How DARE these people not want to share their money with the less-fortunate! After all, its not like they worked for it! They inherited all that money! Someone gave it to them!
But then Ms. Brooks gets down to proposing solutions! Wow! This is starting to get exciting here, isnt it? Jennifer Brooks to the rescue!
First idea! Georgia needs a refundable state Earned Income Tax Credit! She says these tax credit help families boost their income even those without any tax liability!
Well duhhhhhhh. Of course it helps families boost their income! When you create a state EITC that simply takes money away from people who are paying their own way and their own taxes and gives it to people who havent worked as hard or as smart, it tends to boost their income! That word refundable simply means that you get a fat check from the government whether you actually pay any taxes or not. Welfare ... money for nothing ... money forcibly taken from someone else. Simple as that. The federal EITC is the number-one area for tax fraud! So lets get the state on the same road!
Ms. Brooks second idea is for the state to stop what she clearly believes is the abusive and asinine policy of denying cash welfare benefits to people who have more than $1000 in liquid assets. She says that if these people cant get their welfare checks they wont be able to save any money.
Say what? I thought welfare was supposed to be (1) temporary, and (2) to help people cover the cost of lifes basic necessities. Now we learn that welfare is for people who simply need to open a savings account but dont have the money! This amazing liberal thinks the state should seize money, by force, from the person who earned it, and then give it to someone who did not earn it so that they will have some money to save and maybe buy a house some day. Youll just have to excuse me for a moment here I mean Im good at filtering through the rhetorical yak squeeze of the left to see what our proggies friends are up to, but this is really confounding me. Lets see youre going to take money that I was going to put into my savings and give it to someone else so that they can put it into their savings. Really?
Ms. Brooks isnt through with her fantasy raid on your wealth yet. She wants what she calls individual Development Account programs. Whats that? Pretty simple. She wants the state to take even more money from you to give to other people to match, dollar-for-dollar, whatever they put aside on their own for a house, to start a business, or to go to college. Hey! Government! Ive saved $4000 for a house here, but I need an $8000 down payment! Could you please go take that money from someone else and give it to me so I can get this closing scheduled? I wonder what Ms. Brooks would think about giving the person who was forced to make the matching contribution a share of the eventual equity in that home, of the profits of that business, or the earnings that come from the college education?
I trust that during the course of this day you will be able to cleanse your rational mind of the liberal effluent Ive thrown your way. Just know this. In the world of the liberal you are not yours. You do not own yourself, nor do you own the fruits of your labors. The government owns you. The government will decide how the money you earned is distributed. You will be allowed to keep enough to keep you happy to keep you working. The amount you are allowed to keep will be referred to in Washington as a tax expenditure. The rest of the money you have earned, which will be referred to as your fair share, will be spent to create more and more government dependency more and more voters who will be automatically vote for their liberal benefactor.
OK, the readings over. When you get that taste out of your mouth you can resume normal behavior.
I think a serious discussion of WHY leftists think the way they do could be interesting, but most posts would be blank because I think that is HOW liberals think.
I am reminded of a line from National Lampoon Radio Dinner: A journey through the oceans of most men's souls would would barely get your feet wet.
This is OBAMA speaking through one of his many useful idiots. Make no mistake. It is Marxism pure and simple.
Does Ms. Brooks ever explain how she plans to make sure that money intended for a savings account really gets to the account and stays there?
I’m pretty sure anyone who is given $1000 he didn’t earn will have a larger tv before sundown. A mortgage down payment? Not so much.
More people than you think are going to save that money. Friend of a coworker, took his stimulus check circa 2006, and used it to help pay down his credit card bill. This is part of the reason that those stimulus checks did not have the effect that was expected. A significant percentage of people take "found" money and save it, or in the example I used use it to pay down debts which can mean the same thing.
Fortunately, Ayn Rand gave us a gameplay for dealing with the libtards years ago. Anyone who hasn’t Gone Galt at this point is enabling the irresponsible. Like giving booze to a drunk.
Interesting theory on Chronic Toxoplasmosis Infection of the CNS recently seems to explain the libtards “thinking”...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.