LAPD would need a lot more than 10!
Screw the deer. Our founders would have been more concerned about how many bullets it would take to kill tyrants.
Great article by American Thinker. I love the repeated references about Eliot Switzer...Eliot Spitzer aka Emperor’s Club VIP Client 9
“No one hunts with an assault rifle”.
Nope. I don’t even hunt anymore. I’ve been a vegetarian for 40 years (yes, 40). But if feral animals mess with me, they will be in a world of hurt.
Good show! Pull out as soon as you can.
Mrs. Cuomo’s little Andy could use a little tutoring on the history of the United States and the Bill or Rights. We have hunting and fishing regulations and licenses for hunting. We have the Second Amendment to provide Americans with the ability to defend themselves against an oppressive government. It’s not rocket science.
I read an article regarding 30+ companies refusing to sell to state and fed gov't who want to impose restrictions on citizens. In the comment section there was a question as to where the largest gun manufacturers are with all of this? (Remington, Smith and Wesson, Colt etc...)
I'm interested as to why they are not speaking up, leaving it to smaller manufacturers to stand their ground on behalf of the entire industry.
“No one hunts with an assault rifle. No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer.”
BS. He’s either lying, ignorant or both. I choose both. I hear lots of talking heads saying the same thing. Although hunting has nothing to do with the second amendment, many people do hunt with Ar-15 pattern rifles.
So Mr. Ignorant, lying ass Governor, you can Kiss My Ass!
Here is a new Free Republic thread featuring a new essay and 5-minute YouTube video titled Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom. The video has had 16,000 views in the first two days. Now the commie rat bastards have discovered it, and they are NOT happy.
I wrote the essay and helped to produce the video. Its an effort to lift the debate from Newtown small ball to the big leagues of democide, where these efforts at reasonable and commonsense gun control laws always lead to death by the million in the end.
I believe an argument can be made that if gun manufacturers remain in NY, then they are tacitly approving of these tyrannical gun laws & supporting them with their tax dollars. Therefore, gun & ammo buyers need to boycott these complicit manufacturers.
Frankly, it is time that right thinking Americans boycott EVERYTHING from states like NY, CA, IL.
listen stooopid... nobody OWNS an "Assault Rifle"!!!
they own Sporting Rifle's and are used all the time to take Coydogs and Hogs and Pierre Dogs!
but what would a RAT like you know about what real Americans use guns for anyway???
bullet = life saver
more bullets = more chances to save life
cuomo needs his license pulled and his law school needs to lose acreditation.
The point is missed every time by a Democrat.
Speaking personally, this is erroneous upon its face. I know of several people who hunt with an 'assault rifle'. M-16's, M-14's, M-1 Garand's, BAR's, Black Powder muzzleloading rifles, flintlocks, and even Daisy BB rifles are all 'assault rifles' when used to 'assault' in some form. If you use a toy-rifle to beat someone over the head with, then that's an 'assault rifle'. A wooden mockup incapable of being anything but a carved bit of a stick is an 'assault rifle' in a strictly legal sense, even used as a club. Faith, even a Moderate Muslim's rifle is an 'assault rifle' at some point -generally while finished reloading.
("Moderate Muslim" = someone whose gun is out of bullets)
As for " 'needing' ten bullets to kill a deer", I can think of several individuals offhand who needed MORE than ten bullets in their attempts to bring their quarry down. Now, SHOULD be only ONE bullet necessary, and that's a strictly personal opinion, mind, but it really depends mostly upon the skills of the shooter when all's said and done. And a bit of luck, betimes.
Some people just run a good chance of starving if they had to rely upon their shooting skills to put food on the table, truth be told.