Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The United States Heads to the South China Sea ^ | February 21, 2013 | Michael T. Klare

Posted on 02/25/2013 12:57:08 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Why American Involvement Will Mean More Friction -- Not Less

When U.S. officials are asked to comment on disputes over contested islands in the western Pacific, they invariably affirm that the Obama administration has no position on issues of sovereignty but opposes any use of force to resolve the matter. "Whether with regard to disputes in the South China Sea or in the East China Sea," Deputy Secretary of State William Burns declared last October in Tokyo, the United States "does not take a position on the question of ultimate sovereignty." True to form, he continued, "What we do take a position on is the importance of dealing with those questions through dialogue and diplomacy and avoiding intimidation and coercion." In this and other such statements, the United States projects an aura of neutrality -- even suggesting, on occasion, that the country could serve as a good-faith mediator between disputants. But Washington's stance is less neutral than it appears and more geared toward violent conflict than talking it out.

In the East China Sea, China and Japan are squabbling over a cluster of small, uninhabited islands called the Diaoyu by the Chinese and the Senkaku by the Japanese. Japan has administered the islands since the end of World War II, but China, Taiwan, and Japan all lay claim to them. In the South China Sea, meanwhile, tensions have flared over several island groups, most notably the Spratly and Paracel islands (called, respectively, the Nansha and Xisha by China). China, Taiwan, and Vietnam claim all of these islands, and Brunei, Malaysia, and the Philippines claim some of them.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; southchinasea; usa

1 posted on 02/25/2013 12:57:12 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Article from March 22, 2012

All Quiet in the South China Sea

Why China is Playing Nice (For Now)

2 posted on 02/25/2013 1:01:30 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

China claims the Spratley’s but it is so far away that their warplanes barely have the gas to get there.

3 posted on 02/25/2013 1:07:34 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I don’t think we have a horse in this race....

However, the Chinese claim to the Spratley’s is patently absurd. Viet Nam, the Philippines, and Malaysia are all far closer....

4 posted on 02/25/2013 1:42:33 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1

“I don’t think we have a horse in this race....”

It is in our political interest to support our long-term ally Japan. Economically, however, we are China’s bit*h.

5 posted on 02/25/2013 2:50:03 PM PST by Owl558 ("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson