Skip to comments.Liberal Reporter (Savannah Guthrie) Helps Prove Obama's Birth Certificate Has Been Altered.
Posted on 02/25/2013 7:39:18 PM PST by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Please pay attention very closely to this informative evidence easily explained in the video. It is clear proof that the document that Savannah Guthrie held and took a picture of on April 27, 2011 was a creation.
Impressive work. Thank you.
Obamugabe could admit on live television that his BC was a fraud and 1/2 of the American people simply would not care. As long as they continued to get their entitlement checks they would be happy.
“Odumbo’s BC is not a fraud!”
The observation about the clipping mask is what immediately gave away Obama’s forgery. No scanning process, optimization or character recognition adds a clipping mask that hides part of a document and the inverse is true that no document grows magically after it is scanned by hiding the clipping mask. A similar background problem occurred with Obama’s 2008 COLB and the document allegedly photographed by factlack dot org. The document in the photographs has more background paper than the image that was scanned and posted, except there’s no clipping mask to account for the difference in background size. And of course, the biggest problem with either of these alleged documents is the raised seal that doesn’t exist in some forms and in others, doesn’t match the description of a legal HI DOH raised seal.
The sampling in the serial number also varies as does the font/contours of the 1 digits. It’s a joke.
what is a clipping mask?
The WH LFBC clipping mask analysis here is not new but is succinctly articulated by Mark Gillar, who helped prepare the AV presentation of the Arpaio Posse evidence, IIRC.
The video explains it. Did you watch it??
All good points.
“Mark Gillar, who helped prepare the AV presentation of the Arpaio Posse evidence, IIRC.”
You would be correct.
It is a real good Photoshop job though. Clipping around a signature is tough and it looks like they did an expert job at that.
BTW, the Obot clown was a hilarious touch in the video.
A clipping mask is basically the edge of an image that let’s you grab only the visible part of the image and not the background. Used to drop things into pictures, or in this case into a birth certificate.
Some graphics expert on here can correct me if I’m not 100 percent on that. I know how to do it not always what it is called...and I do good work if I do say so myself
When you build a document in a program like InDesign and export it as a PDF, I don’t think flattening is an option ... or at least it’s not an obvious option.
The elephant in the room are the white halos surrounding the bitmapped areas, including MOST of the type (but not all). If you zoom in a few hundred percent, you can see the white halos around the characters which would NOT be present if the bitmapped lines and characters were present on the green security paper from the outset. The presence of halos indicates the lines and text were scanned and imported onto a scanned image of the green security paper background:
See the white halos? This tells you that the imagery is scanned then selected then placed into another document containing the green security paper as another layer. These halos WOULD NOT BE PRESENT if this bc were one entity from the onset. Interesting to note that the number '2' handwritten in pencil is the same way 0bama writes his 2's. See his '2's'?
Dumb ass amateur Obama....
If you are going to forge a BC document, you do it right using original paper, recreated re-word stamps and original typewriter with vintage ink in the damn thing!!!!!
They you scan the damn thing into the internet....
I could probably come up with a better forgery of his Birth certificate and I am NOT an expert whatsoever....
It is the difference between using a photocopier to counterfeit money vs. getting original ink and plates and paper and printing your order “near perfect” forgeries...
Some tin foiler people think that Obama is a CIA plant, no way in hell are they THAT damn SLOPPY....
The forger should have printed the photoshop file. Then they should have scanned the printout to eliminate most of the evidence of forgery.
But there is also image cloning that would still be evident.