Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Reason Romney Lost: He Had A Full Blown Idiot (Stuart Stevens) Running His Campaign.
Red State ^ | 2/25/2013 | Martin Knight

Posted on 02/26/2013 4:03:57 AM PST by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: IbJensen
Say what you will but Palin would have run a better campaign unloosed with the MSM attack dogs in full bay. She would have hit Obama on the specific issues that may have sunk him. She was far more electable and desirable for the masses than was Romney.
61 posted on 02/26/2013 5:07:52 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
So we are supposed to believe that Romney, a man who achieved such success in business, went out and hired a team of idiots to win?

Sure. Business isn't politics. There are people -- especially in the WASP community who have a good head for business but are lost when it comes to things like politics.

Either Romney’s financial and business success was a total accident or he tanked himself. No other explanation is logical. Next issue is while so many cling to “Oh he would have been better than Obama!”

I'm not sure what you mean by "tanked," but the general feeling was that almost any Republican would be better than Obama. Romney was always a throw of the dice. I knew from the beginning that he didn't appear to have good political skills. Last year's field of candidates was an especially weak one, though. It's hard to say that there was anybody running who could have done better.

62 posted on 02/26/2013 5:26:52 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

I wouldn’t discount this immediately, I wonder how many of the consultancy staff actually voted for Romney...


63 posted on 02/26/2013 5:49:06 PM PST by garbanzo (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins
No, Romney is done. All this post mortem stuff is idle. Yes this Stu is a moron, and yes Romney ran a crappy campaign. The dog barks, the caravan moves on. Water under the bridge. Whatever.
64 posted on 02/26/2013 7:18:30 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

I will say what I will: I agree 100%!!!!!!!!!!


65 posted on 02/26/2013 7:52:19 PM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Junky, Obozo is a phony. There is no proof that he’s an American. He went to Harvard on the premise that he was a needy student from Jakarta. He uses a dead man’s social security number. He has spent millions to keep all records sealed.

And he is a halfrican.


66 posted on 02/26/2013 7:54:19 PM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DH

I liked Gingrich if he could have set the record straight about his “baggage.” Who did you want?


67 posted on 02/27/2013 1:59:29 AM PST by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Gingrich.

He was the only one of the bunch that was knowledgeable enough and a real fighter. He was not a “go along to get along” politician.


68 posted on 02/27/2013 3:54:34 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
The answer: pray that God reveals it to us, or perhaps he already has.






Are you still killing your unborn?

-- GOD


 

69 posted on 02/27/2013 6:28:05 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; sickoflibs; justiceseeker93; thouworm; Osage Orange; stephenjohnbanker; AuntB; ...
Obozo is a phony. There is no proof that he’s an American. He got into Harvard posing as a needy foreign student from Jakarta. He uses a dead man’s social security number. He has spent millions to keep all records his sealed. And he is a halfrican.

You got that right.

2012 Ohaha used the same conniving 2008 strategy patented by PR honcho Anita (Mao) Dunn---to manipulate voters, to downplay Ohaha's bgrnd, his destructive policies ....and his scary plans for his next term.

Remember, Dunn said back then, that THEY and only THEY decided what the media and the voters should know about 2008 candidate Ohaha. The strategy was to have Ohaha and his shady handlers play the innocents---the "don't worry--we're harmless" act.

I got my biggest laugh of the day when wily David Axelrod went before the cameras with his phony wide-eyed "deer in the headlights" look.

===============================================

The WH is teeming with kingpins of crooked Chicago politics. Voter fraud is the Chi/mobs specialty.

Let us not forget----the minute they hit the WH, the Chi/mob went into action: (1) the WH Chi/mob took over the census---and have all the CV they need to file phony FEC reports using stolen federal dollars as campaign contributions. (2) Plus COS Rham (The Godfather) Emanuel was put in charge of the US Treasury.

2012 Ohaha even bragged his was the first "billion dollar" campaign---a creepy way to show how "popular" he is (gag).

As Judge Judy would say: "Show me where you got the money to pay for this."

70 posted on 02/27/2013 7:27:37 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Either Romney’s financial and business success was a total accident or he tanked himself.

Probably after the Powers That Be had their customary "talk" with Romney he decided it wasn't worth it. The last man of honor to hold the office was very nearly the victim of early term limits.

71 posted on 02/27/2013 8:17:50 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I may have got it right, but you NAILED it!

There isn’t a legitimate human being in all 900 staffers that swarm about in the White Hut and it’s not honey they’re making! They’re cooking up a nightmare for the USA.


72 posted on 02/27/2013 8:28:26 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: lilypad

Romney lost because he ran a bad campaign. Yes the deck was stacked against us but he had a winnable hand which he chose not to play. That he chose not to run an aggressive campaign is all on him and not the Dem/MSM. When he fought fire with fire it was quite effective.

If the entire campaign had been like the first debate and the Jacksonville press conference Romney would be POTUS now.

But he chose to tip toe to finish line and got steamrolled by the dems/MSM narrative. That is all on Mitt and nobody else.


73 posted on 02/27/2013 8:28:46 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Romney should have listened to me

If your aunt had balls, she'd be your uncle.

We all had Romney dialed in here by the end of January 2102. Everything I said about why he was Zero's dream candidate came true. Many others made similar or identical points.

It's not OUR fault he was nominated. The outcome was perfectly predictable, lots of us predicted it, right here.

It wasn't that Romney didn't "listen". He had strategic and tactical problems galore, all right, but who he was, what he made of Obama, and the direction he wanted to take the country were the core reasons for failure, which the poor half-dead GOP could not have overcome with Romney as the nominee.

74 posted on 02/27/2013 8:35:40 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The outcome was perfectly predictable, lots of us predicted it, right here.

And, a LOT of us Christians (Who have a bit higher different standard than some) said we'd NEVER vote for a decieved member of a heretical sect to be Leader of the Free World; whose discernment is so poor.

And; predictably; we got blamed for O winning.

75 posted on 02/27/2013 10:14:01 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The purpose of the United States is to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

Some, earlier, saw it a bit differently...


 
 
 
Mayflower Compact
 
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of the Christian faith and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, 1620.

 
 
 

76 posted on 02/27/2013 10:18:37 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The purpose of the United States is to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

Some, earlier, saw it a bit differently...


 
 
 
Mayflower Compact
 
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of the Christian faith and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, 1620.

 
 
 

77 posted on 02/27/2013 10:22:43 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; Liz; LottieDah; NYC GOP Chick; NYC Republican; SunkenCiv; Alamo-Girl; Clintonfatigued; ...
Never heard of this Romney campaign guru Stuart Stevens before, but I can almost guarantee that he came from the RINO wing of the party, so as to be ideologically synergistic with his candidate as much as possible. That being said, Martin Knight, the author of the posted piece, is venting a bit too much about the performance of the Romney team in the last election. Although the campaign made its share of mistakes, notably the failure to make Benghazi an issue against Obama in the final weeks and the reluctance to attack Obama's sleazy background, there were also the successes of the candidate's debate performances and the drawing of large enthusiastic crowds to events down the stretch. Compared to the McCain campaign performance four years earlier, this was an upgrade.

It would appear that Democrat election fraud and cheating, targeted to the populous Dem controlled cities and counties in the swing states, may have been the decisive factor. The national GOP as a party was negligent in failing to plan for, devise and implement a counter-strategy to the systemic violations of the integrity of the election system perpetrated by the opposition - especially considering that they should have been forewarned by what had occurred in 2008.

78 posted on 02/27/2013 2:11:55 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; Liz; LottieDah; NYC GOP Chick; NYC Republican; SunkenCiv
I suspected a problem when the RNC called early in summer asking for contributions. Their plea was based on "changing the House of Representatives". Huh? What about the presidency? No response. The real shocker came when I learned, after the election, that Romney never wanted to be president! What!!!

The full picture began to emerge. The GOP never anticipated a presidential win but had pinned all their hopes on other candidates that might alter the Senate and House of Representatives. What sort of party runs a presidential candidate who does not want the job!!! I'm done with them.

79 posted on 02/27/2013 3:15:43 PM PST by NYer (“Beware the man of a single book.” - St. Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
How do you prepare or 2008 when McCain got 4 million fewer votes than Bush just 4 years earlier?

Obama got a record number of votes that year but not at all an unusual amount compared to Bush four years earlier.

What it looks like is McCain and Romney both failed to get normal growth ~ and instead not only lost normal growth, they lost some of the core Republican voters.

That would be, of course, the Rockefeller wing ~ Romney's own peeps! They just didn't show up and they didn't bother telling people they weren't going to do that, and nobody in those states went out and sought to find more Republicans in a registration drive!

80 posted on 02/27/2013 3:39:54 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson