Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama hideous Oscar dress cost tax payers nearly $9,000
http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2013/02/25/michelle-obama-hideous-oscar-dress-cost-tax-payers-nearly-9000/ ^

Posted on 02/26/2013 11:46:15 AM PST by pacificpundit

So not only did Michelle Obama hijack the Oscars, she stuck it (again) to the tax payers as-well. You’ll be happy to know that the cost of Michelle Obama’s hideous Oscar dress designed has an estimated price tag of $8,990.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2013oscars; dress; michelleobama; moochelle

1 posted on 02/26/2013 11:46:21 AM PST by pacificpundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I have nothing but contempt for Baraq and MooseChelle, but what evidence is there in that blog that the taxpayers paid for it?

Designers typically furnish stuff like this free to celebs for the publicity value.


2 posted on 02/26/2013 11:50:20 AM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

And the Libtards excoriated Sarah Palin for shopping?


3 posted on 02/26/2013 11:51:56 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

You need a lot of material to cover that caboose.


4 posted on 02/26/2013 11:52:01 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Anyone else remember the “She gets red dresses, we get pink slips” comments about Nancy Reagan?


5 posted on 02/26/2013 11:53:44 AM PST by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Welcome to Free Republic

HTML Sandbox 2012

Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

6 posted on 02/26/2013 11:55:14 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

I haven’t seen it yet, not that it matters.


7 posted on 02/26/2013 11:56:32 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

It's Moose and Squirrel!

8 posted on 02/26/2013 12:00:54 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I thought designers loaned clothes to her sometimes, because of the publicity. If that was actually taxpayer money, I would rather not have paid for it.

I will say, though, she looked a lot nicer than she has on many other occasions.


9 posted on 02/26/2013 12:01:12 PM PST by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Designers typically furnish stuff like this free to celebs for the publicity value.

I think that is probably correct...designers flocked to Jackie and Nancy...they were excellent manikins.

10 posted on 02/26/2013 12:04:41 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

11 posted on 02/26/2013 12:07:44 PM PST by Zakeet (Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
I'm more disgusted with Moochelle decorating her set with US military officers.

Any one of whom are worth 50 Marxist leaning first ladies.

12 posted on 02/26/2013 12:10:30 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Even if the hypocrite paid for the dress (Most likely loaned), she would of had to do the purchase using her own/joint bank account. If the dress was a gift then Boehner/IRS better start investigating. Ditto if appropriated funds for the White House were used to purchase the thing. The Obamas may be arrogant, but they sure as heck are not stupid.
13 posted on 02/26/2013 12:11:46 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

The ruling elite uses our money to live high on the hog, and in return, has nothing but contempt for us.


14 posted on 02/26/2013 12:12:59 PM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

They don’t do freebies and she can’t accept gifts...


15 posted on 02/26/2013 12:20:44 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

welcome and hope you have a thick skin, sometimes it gets hot and heavy on certain subjects...thats why we love it..


16 posted on 02/26/2013 12:23:04 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
That's a lot money for DUCT TAPE
17 posted on 02/26/2013 12:23:27 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

We should be discussing whether her husband is eligible to be president....not the dress Michelle wore.

Lets leave the wardrobe stuff to gay men. Conservative Americans need to focus on Obama Eligibility


18 posted on 02/26/2013 12:26:10 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

We should be discussing whether her husband is eligible to be president....not the dress Michelle wore.

Lets leave the wardrobe stuff to gay men. Conservative Americans need to focus on Obama Eligibility


19 posted on 02/26/2013 12:26:35 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

So the blog pimp is most likely incorrect.

As distasteful as it may be to most FReepers, MooseChelle is widely admired in the liberal / feminist / celebrity worship circles and this Indian guy who designed the dress is probably getting orders like crazy.


20 posted on 02/26/2013 12:27:06 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I have nothing but contempt for sites like this.

They are resource hogs, which load a bunch uh crap on their page and often freeze my phone.

Couldn’t even read the article before I had to pull the battery on my phone.


21 posted on 02/26/2013 12:30:56 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
It's embarrassing how infatuated these people are with themselves!
22 posted on 02/26/2013 12:31:17 PM PST by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
The designers do get a bump...no doubt.

I believe one of her early designers is already out of business.

23 posted on 02/26/2013 12:31:37 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I believe it is done via ‘loans’.


24 posted on 02/26/2013 12:32:43 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: pacificpundit

I’d hate for all this dress material to go to waste.

Surely, the assistant cook needs a new apron, or theres some wh basement window could use a newer curtain...


26 posted on 02/26/2013 12:33:57 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Can someone show me a regulation where it says that the taxpayers have to pay for clothing for the President and his immediate family? I think this is a bogus allegation. The only federal employees that get clothing allowances, to my knowledge, are those that use them for their job such as firemen, federal uniformed police etc.

Someone prove me wrong.


27 posted on 02/26/2013 12:34:42 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

All ways are the queens ways.


28 posted on 02/26/2013 12:37:12 PM PST by McGruff (You are either with us or you are with the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Wasn't there some old adage about wrapping a sow's rear in a silk purse?

M V is for Muvva


29 posted on 02/26/2013 12:44:06 PM PST by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I think it’s sow’s EAR, not rear.


30 posted on 02/26/2013 1:02:22 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Look at you!

Woodward broke Watergate story, Drudge broke the Lewinsky scandal and you just broke the Michelle Obama $9000 tax payer paid dress scandal!

Great work!

You are destined for the investigative journalism HoF.

BTW-what is your source?


31 posted on 02/26/2013 1:12:53 PM PST by OKRA2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Mooshelle's hidious dress;

Don't those 'V's' look kinda funny there? LOL

And that stupid hairdo. With the wig hair pulled back and the long bangs, it emphasizes the homely face..buck teeth and all

32 posted on 02/26/2013 2:06:58 PM PST by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

No matter how much the dress cost, she’s still ugly as a fried kidney. Nothing can help that face.


33 posted on 02/26/2013 2:38:50 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Q: What's silver, shiny and would look good on Michelle Obama?
A:

34 posted on 02/26/2013 3:22:06 PM PST by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What did mooooooochele do with all her cloths made from grand moms old drapes?


35 posted on 02/26/2013 3:45:54 PM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon
No matter how much the dress cost, she’s still ugly as a fried kidney.

I've always said that she's as ugly as a mud fence but,

"What difference does it make?!?"

36 posted on 02/26/2013 5:07:19 PM PST by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: houeto

LOL (ugh)


37 posted on 02/27/2013 8:54:48 AM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson