Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: Itís going to be really embarrassing for the Left if we come out of sequestration alive
Hotair ^ | 02/26/2013 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 02/26/2013 12:42:12 PM PST by SeekAndFind

To hear President Obama and the Cabinet officials he has been steadily trotting out like show ponies tell it, the sequester cuts cannot, must not happen, because we’ll subsequently be hit with all kinds of disasters just short of a plague of locusts. Come on, White House, get it together --- I don't know that the sequester is the best specific way to get this done either, and maybe defense-related spending is getting the short end of the stick, but not even the Department of Interior can manage their devastating, draconian budget cuts, really? It's almost like you're trying to tell us that the Obama administration has discovered the absolutely optimal size of the federal bureaucracy, that everything the government currently does is nothing less than essential, and that the feds know how to spend our dolla' dolla' bills much better than we do --- so those miserly rich people better start paying up their even bigger fair share, stat!

Which is precisely why the sequester is a sort of existential crisis for the federal government: If sequestration happens and, miraculously, we manage to avoid mass calamity, that could present a real problem for President Obama's big-liberal-government thesis that we need to hike taxes even more to pay for all of the ostensibly indispensable things the government does on our behalf, as well as make Republicans’ calls for further, substantive deficit reduction all the more reasonable.

One of Obama’s complaints has been that, by law, the sequester doesn’t afford enough flexibility in the way the cuts are implemented, but Republicans have offered up some possible solutions to that particular pickle — and yet the White House still isn’t even remotely satisfied. I wonder why that could be?

Krauthammer nails it. Via RCP, click the image to watch:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

 photo krauthammertime_zps6a394d66.jpg

Cutting is always attractive in the abstract but in the details it rarely is because there are constituencies who get affected if you have cuts. But the cynicism of the campaign of this administration is astonishing. The assumption is that somehow at every stage of the expansion of the liberal federal government we have reached a platonic ideal and that if you cut a dollar off that, it’s as if God had devised exactly the size of government America needs and any cut leads to Armageddon.

What we’re talking about here is two cents on the dollar. Every dollar the government spends today, 35 cents is borrowed from the Chinese and others. What is going on here is ending up in a position where we borrow not 35, but 33 cents, and that is going to bring Armageddon. An example of the cynicism of this campaign, is one lobbyist for the liberal causes leading 3,000 organizations in opposing the cuts, who told The Washington Post the following: ‘The worst case scenario is the sequester hits and nothing really bad happens.’

Think of the cynicism of that. The worst case scenario is that the government makes a small, minuscule cut in spending on the way to beginning of a journey of recovery in to fiscal health, and that it doesn’t hurt us, we actually come out of it alive. And, that to them, is the worst case. It means, think of how they are weighing the national interest, which needs a cut in spending and these parochial special interests.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: krauthammer; obamapunishesusa; sequester; sequestration

1 posted on 02/26/2013 12:42:15 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It’s going to be really embarrassing for the Left if we come out of sequestration alive

I am inclined to agree. However, will the media portray it as such? I highly doubt it.

2 posted on 02/26/2013 12:44:45 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Charles, are you new to this country?

Nothing ever embarrasses the left, NOTHING.

If sequestration happens, and there are no issues, it will be ignored. Any problems will be magnified as much as possible.


3 posted on 02/26/2013 12:47:02 PM PST by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I watched CNN’s coverage of O’s speech at Newport News earlier today. The new narrative is, yeah, people aren’t going to see problems on Saturday or Monday, but they will start to see problems in March or April — extended unemployment &c.

If that’s true, it was never allowed to be reported. The Message is definitely being tweaked a little bit.


4 posted on 02/26/2013 12:48:16 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

I predict that ANY problem that happens from now until 2014 will be attributed to sequestration, and the blame will be pinned on the Republicans. The media will make sure of it.


5 posted on 02/26/2013 12:50:15 PM PST by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Obamedia will have to make sure we know of our deep misery and the poll numbers that say Obama is not to blame and the Republicans are killing old people and children.


6 posted on 02/26/2013 12:53:17 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
However, will the media portray it as such?

That goes without saying.

I'm still counting on the Sun coming up on Mar. 1st, the grocery stores will have food and the bars will have booze.

And Obama will look silly.

7 posted on 02/26/2013 12:53:47 PM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No it’s not. Nothing embarrasses the Left. These people proudly support infanticide and adultery.

Whatever the outcome, the Left will take credit and place any blame on the Republicans. And the whole media will carry their water.


8 posted on 02/26/2013 12:55:00 PM PST by TJ Jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNGal

Never, NEVER let a “crisis” go to waste!

And, if there is no “crisis” — just CREATE one!


9 posted on 02/26/2013 12:56:42 PM PST by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The media will find someone affected by the Sequester, out behind a McDonalds, dumpster diving.


10 posted on 02/26/2013 12:56:42 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Oh, for heaven’s sake. That line of you-know-what smells just like the “we’ll never know how bad the economy would have gotten if we DIDN’T spend ourselves into oblivion!”


11 posted on 02/26/2013 1:01:58 PM PST by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNGal

All problems from January 2009 through February 2013 are Bush’s fault. All problems after March 1, 2013 are the fault of the Republicans controlling the House of Representatives.
George W. Bush officially goes into retirement on Friday.


12 posted on 02/26/2013 1:06:54 PM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pfony1

Bingo. They are going to create a MAJOR disaster. Doesn’t matter how many people get killed, because human lives mean nothing to these people.


13 posted on 02/26/2013 1:19:40 PM PST by bergmeid (I told you so - now pass the ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid
Just a little collateral damage...
14 posted on 02/26/2013 1:24:32 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What’ll happen Charlie boy? Can we count on a really, really extended eyebrow peak on your face? That’ll show ‘em.


15 posted on 02/26/2013 1:29:07 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s why Obama is releasing “differently documented” immigrants from prison — to make sure it’s a disaster. Alinsky rules!


16 posted on 02/26/2013 1:35:17 PM PST by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

“Bingo. They are going to create a MAJOR disaster. Doesn’t matter how many people get killed, because human lives mean nothing to these people.”

Wall street correction. And now we will hear about the spike in oil prices and the high cost of food. All blamed on the Republicans.


17 posted on 02/26/2013 1:35:42 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Got a problem? Nothing a drone strike can't fix.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama could be really dangerous to prove his rhetoric. He could release violent, dangerous illegal aliens. He could arrange for some contaminated meat to get into the food supply. He could cripple air transportation and maybe throw in a crash or two. He could pull what is left of security off the border and invite the cartels to raid border towns. He can encourage Nut Job in Iran to attack a gulf state and then sit it out claiming he doesn't have the military resources, and on and on. How many does he need to kill to win? As many as it takes.
18 posted on 02/26/2013 1:41:42 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“‘The worst case scenario is the sequester hits and nothing really bad happens.’”

Obama and Co. will do whatever it takes to ensure that bad things happen. See the threads about releasing “waves” of illegal aliens, in advance of the sequester cuts. That’s an example of a classic textbook maneuver for fighting budget cuts — cut the most popular or critical programs first. (By “textbook”, I mean actual textbooks — I studied this in a graduate school course on finance and budgeting.)


19 posted on 02/26/2013 1:43:31 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

it will go down the media memory hole after a few weeks of Obama using black women and children as props.
Here in NoVa, Fairfax county executive (big lib of course) blamed the 2012 economy on the “upcoming sequester”... So for the first time we have an entire county that jumped ahead to an alternate timeline that included an actual cut in government spending.. It has absolutely nothing to do with the abysmal economy created by Obama’s policies.

They actually believe this.


20 posted on 02/26/2013 1:45:31 PM PST by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
I should add that the textbooks I was referring to above were pointing out the various budget dodges, and ways that each one could be countered, so that budgets could actually be balanced. OTOH, I'm sure that Obama's budget people would have read it as a how-to manual for dodging cuts. Not that they would have needed to -- Alinsky's Rules for Radicals told them everything they need to know.
21 posted on 02/26/2013 1:48:52 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When Clinton signed the Republican welfare reform bill in the 90’s, the left said people would be starving in the streets.

Didn’t happen of course, and they weren’t embarrassed. They still use the same language today if you talk about cutting spending.


22 posted on 02/26/2013 1:56:30 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What does this term of speech mean: "stat".

Here it is used like this: so those miserly rich people better start paying up their even bigger fair share, stat!

Anyone know? Some jargon I'm not familiar with.

23 posted on 02/26/2013 2:09:35 PM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

RE: What does this term of speech mean: “stat”

Short form for Statim, which is Latin for ‘immediately’.

Meaning: asap, right away, without delay, pronto.


24 posted on 02/26/2013 2:21:19 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, the Democrats will fight sequestration tooth and nail. And there are probably enough Republicans who will fold.

You can’t get any cuts done with Washington the way it is, and I don’t know what can be done.


25 posted on 02/26/2013 2:23:00 PM PST by popdonnelly (The right to self-defense is older than the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

I predict they will throw up barricades and close down Interstates 80,90, 95 and 75 on Good Friday and blame it on the sequester.

I also suspect a mass outbreak of Blue Flu and Gloslowitis will hit the TSA over Easter Weekend.


26 posted on 02/26/2013 2:25:24 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Dangerous, violent illegal aliens are not being released. This I know.


27 posted on 02/26/2013 2:46:54 PM PST by Reagan‹berAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

From working with the public employee unions in CA during budget crises, cutting the increase in their budgets would mean that their members won’t be able to demand as big as wage increase and they might have to (gasp) contribute a couple of bucks to their healthcare and pensions. They fight for tax increases and campaign that the poor will be cut off, not enough teachers and police, and the budget cuts wouldn’t do that at all if the unions would give a little. They don’t care about the poor at all.


28 posted on 02/26/2013 2:58:00 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
What’ll happen Charlie boy? Can we count on a really, really extended eyebrow peak on your face? That’ll show ‘em.

Krauthammer Derangement Syndrome.

A really sad affliction that results in hurling insults at Charles Krauthammer even when the sufferer agrees with him. The only known cure is a weekend in isolation with Candy Crowley and Rachel Maddow.

Such treatment at this time is, unfortunately, not covered under the Affordable Care Act.

29 posted on 02/26/2013 3:07:38 PM PST by BfloGuy (Money, like chocolate on a hot oven, was melting in the pockets of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The whole thing is a baby step. Most people will never even know it happened.


30 posted on 02/26/2013 6:55:25 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Forget the media. We need to portray it as such and make fun of them at the same time.

Obama is choosing the harm. If he cannot manage a miniscule two cent cut, let’s get somebody who can.


31 posted on 02/27/2013 3:12:16 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson