The founder of GOProud is on Red-Eye often.
He seems like a conservative to me.
Keep the bedroom stuff where it belongs.
CPAC should include them I think.
GOProud is a single issue organization, and it leads to pedophile-rights.
no it should not.
they are just a rebranded (ala acorn) mole group to push the socialist agenda. It is always ok to lie to the Dhimies.
These homosexuals should have kept their mouths shut FIRST and not even mentioned their personal recreation sex fetishes.
NO IT SHOULDN'T...and yes...I'm screamimg that at the top of my lungs! If you don't understand that the gay agenda is the antithesis of the conservative movement then you can't count yourself a conservative!
What's the name of the pervert?
Any other episodes of liberal belief you wanna get off your chest before the lightning hits?
GOProud was a one-issue organization. Not selling conservatism to homosexuals, but selling gay activism to conservatives. It was a makeover of the Log Cabin Republicans, because that group had pretty well exposed itself for what it was.
Gay marriage, gay rights, gay adoptions, criminal prosecution for saying anything negative about the gay activist movement—that’s what GOProud stood for.
And, as a Valley Girl might say, they totally took over the CPAC convention. They bused in their followers, filled the seats, flooded the hallways, and distracted attention from everything else.
Nothing conservative about them. Their sole interest was the usual one—making everyone toe the gay activist line or be condemned for homophobia.
“Keep the bedroom stuff where it belongs.
CPAC should include them I think.”
Problem is they don’t keep it in the bedroom - it must be in our schools - our libraries - our churches even. And if you don’t like 24-7 homosexual fornication shoved down your throat you are branded as a “hater”.
The GOP has always had gay members --- right back to the time of Abraham Lincoln, I should think. That was when people didn't turn their arousal pattern into an "issue."
So, there are gay conservatives. This is clear (at least, to me.) But GOProud is not conservative, because it consists precisely of those gays who want their private stuff to be a public issue.
If you believe CPAC should include a group of single issue homosexual activists then you don't think. You are incapable of intelligent thought.
That is like saying the Boy Scouts should include more homosexual scout masters and the Catholic Church should include more homosexual priests.
If any of these people are truly interested in conservative ideas they can attend CPAC on their own. They should not be included as a group solely to advance their homosexual agenda and attack conservatives who disagree with their agenda.
On the other hand, in the future, I think I will withhold my support from any conservative shorter than 5'7" or taller than 6'1"
If they would be conservatives who happen to be gay, I’d agree...
But they call themselves “Gay Conservatives” ....
That’s not keeping it in the bedroom but sticking it in your face...
>> CPAC should include them I think.
The problem is the overt intent of the banner they fly under. Are the members prohibited from attending?
There should be no law forcing citizens to support and service homosexual behavior. Doubtful “GOProud” fights against such laws. By supporting the laws, it’s effectively a schizophrenic operation promoting both leftwing tyranny and some conservative causes.
Red-Eye is a conservative leaning libertarian program. It’s too dismissive of homosexual law that goes far beyond the issue of liberty and association. Homosexual law is designed to persecute those that refuse to service and support homosexual behavior.
They should include them ONLY if no one KNOWS their “orientation”....
GOProud’s agenda is 80% all fag agenda. They softened it up a while ago so they wouldn’t look so hardcore.
They’re just like the Log Cabin R’s. Merely a group of aggressive sexual perverts whose purpose is fagdom and changing the R party to be as pro-pervert as the Dems.
Keeping the bedroom stuff where it belongs means no pro-fag laws, no fags in the military, no fag marriage, no fag adoption and so on. If the fags kept their fagdom in the bedroom - not in public bathrooms, the Boy Scouts, and so on - no one would know or care.
It’s the homosexuals and their little friends the leftists who are pushing it into everyones’ faces.
If they would shut up and keep it to themselves it would be a different story. But no, they want fag tyranny and many of us are getting sick and tired of it and will not shut up.
Keep sexual perversion private and shut the he** up about it.