Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There is no free speech in Canda but the supreme court was nice enough to say it`s ok to express your thought in personal one on one settings, for now.
1 posted on 02/27/2013 10:45:33 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Para-Ord.45
That's the difference between having your rights enshrined in a inalienable “Bill of Rights” and just being granted them through a friendly “gentlemans agreement” with the Monarchy
2 posted on 02/27/2013 10:53:47 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Our future played out so casually in our view, yet no one seems to care while we travel down this inevitable road to ruin.. Coming attractions, soon to be playing in a forum near you.. STUPID, STUPID, STUPID... :(


3 posted on 02/27/2013 11:05:06 AM PST by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

4 posted on 02/27/2013 11:19:59 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (True North- Strong Leader, Strong Dollar, Strong and Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
I can't tell you how much I hate my country. This decision to suppress religious beliefs and free speech was unanimous! I would find a way to leave my country, but will Obama make America worse than Canada?
6 posted on 02/27/2013 12:11:57 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

Does this also protect the pedophiles and crap?


8 posted on 02/27/2013 12:27:15 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45

The lamps are going out all over
the West, we shall not see them lit
again in our time.


9 posted on 02/27/2013 3:35:08 PM PST by pluvmantelo (Democrats-The party of moral hazard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Para-Ord.45
"But it upheld the controversial legal concept of speech that is “likely to expose” certain groups to hatred."

Why does the Supreme Court itself get to use speech that is “likely to expose” certain groups to hatred"?

10 posted on 02/27/2013 3:48:58 PM PST by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson