Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google, Facebook, Amazon Among 200 Businesses Filing Brief Supporting Gay Marriage
Christian Post ^ | 02/27/2013 | Stoyan Zaimov

Posted on 02/27/2013 11:01:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind

More than 200 of the biggest businesses in America, including Google and Microsoft, said on Wednesday that they will file a brief in support of gay marriage with the Supreme Court.

Yahoo News reported that those companies include Microsoft Corp, Google Inc, Starbucks Corp, Pfizer Inc, Amazon.com, Citigroup Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corp, among others.

Facebook, Morgan Stanley and Intel have already announced their support for gay marriage.

The Supreme Court will take a look at two separate cases on March 26 and March 27 that will examine Proposition 8, the California law that banned gay marriage in 2008, as well as the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), signed by former President Bill Clinton, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

Several outcomes are possible as a result of a review of these laws. Traditional marriage can be reinstated on a federal level if DOMA is upheld, states can be granted the right to continue making their own laws regarding marriage, or they can even be banned from making same-sex marriage illegal on a state level.

President Barack Obama has long made his views clear that he is not a supporter of DOMA, and in May last year he publicly announced that he believes same-sex couples should be allowed to get married.

On Friday, the Obama administration filed a brief with the Supreme Court against DOMA, urging the justices to strike down the federal law which keeps the government from recognizing same-sex couples legally married in states.

"Section 3 of DOMA violates the fundamental constitutional guarantee of equal protection," argued Solicitor General Donald Verrill. "The law denies to tens of thousands of same-sex couples who are legally married under state law an array of important federal benefits that are available to legally married opposite-sex couples. Because this discrimination cannot be justified as substantially furthering any important governmental interest, Section 3 is unconstitutional."

A number of conservative groups remain opposed to redefining marriage in America, and hope that the national trend in recent years which has seen nine U.S. states, as well as D.C., legalize gay marriage does not continue.

"The Supreme Court has made clear that defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman is constitutional as a matter of public policy," said Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Austin R. Nimocks.

"Thus, Congress and President Clinton acted constitutionally when DOMA was enacted. The wisest course is for the Supreme Court to resist demands to prematurely end the national debate over the future of marriage. The court should respect the freedom of both Congress and citizens to affirm a bedrock social institution that diverse cultures and faiths have honored throughout the history of Western Civilization."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: amazon; facebook; gaymarriage; google

1 posted on 02/27/2013 11:01:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
an array of important federal benefits

Which is, after all, what the queers are after.

From "It's none of your business what I do in my bedroom!" to "You're going to support and pay for what I do in my bedroom!" in one generation.

2 posted on 02/27/2013 11:07:47 AM PST by grobdriver (Vivere liberi aut mori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Funny, I thought those companies were providing other services other than supporting gay marriage.

Silly me.


3 posted on 02/27/2013 11:09:17 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

RE: From “It’s none of your business what I do in my bedroom!” to “You’re going to support and pay for what I do in my bedroom!” in one generation.

Oscar Wilde used to call it the “Love that dare not speak its name”. Now it’s the Love that won’t shut the F up.


4 posted on 02/27/2013 11:16:03 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A woman cannot be a husband, and a man cannot be a wife. It’s that simple. Language is what it is. The fact that two men cannot be joined as husband and wife or two women is simply a matter of reality.


5 posted on 02/27/2013 11:24:16 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is not surprising. Businesses are amoral and profit seeking. It’s up to us to set the standard and keep them to it.

Parents have surrendered their kids to the state and the state teaches ungodliness because God is their only competition.


6 posted on 02/27/2013 11:26:42 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It does matter who approves queer marriage it is still up to God..And my God says it is a sin for man to have sex with man and woman with woman..So who really cares what these companies say or any one but God says..

I guess it is just the in thing for idiots to have a gay friend to brag about..Like ever thing else it will pass...

7 posted on 02/27/2013 11:39:54 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is a slap in the face of YHVH. The world hates him and those of his Kingdom.

This is what has come of the Constintinized modern church, which teaches that Yeshua the living Torah, came to do away with the Torah (himself). Torah’s primary meaning is instruction as law. Modern man/church have decided that they can decide right/wrong based upon reason or common sense. We are reaping the result of this twisted (on purpose) doctrine.

Some lawless folks say they want to become like Yeshua, which is impossible given He lived and is the Torah.

IMHO
v


8 posted on 02/27/2013 12:18:39 PM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is what was so frustrating for Ayn Rand and other great conservative thinkers. Our corporate leaders are fine enjoying the fruits of a free and capitalist country but have spent not one cent or one breath coming out to defend our American values such as capitalism or free speech in our marketplace of ideas. But they do have the time and resources to rally for social progressivism.

An exception would be the Koch brothers who tried to get Obama out of the oval office. But why is it always conservative institutions and the middle class that has to fight for gun rights, or free speech, or all the rights we enjoy, and we get no help from the wealthy in America? The left certainly gets lots of help from wealthy liberals and their foundations. But American conservative business leadership is completely quiet. Their silence is as good as being complicit in the opinions of those like Ayn Rand.

9 posted on 02/27/2013 12:24:19 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson