Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Closed-Door Meeting, Cantor Warned of ‘Civil War’
National Review Online ^ | 2-27-2012 | Katrina Trinko

Posted on 02/27/2013 5:07:53 PM PST by bimboeruption

House majority leader Eric Cantor is increasingly frustrated with a group of House Republicans who are working against the leadership, and he’s not afraid of voicing his dismay.

In a closed-door conference meeting on Wednesday, Cantor told one GOP member that if they blocked the Senate-passed Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) from coming to the floor, they’d cause “civil war” in the ranks.

Cantor’s comment irked some Republican aides, who told National Review Online that such strong language is inappropriate. In recent days, some conservatives have been upset about the Senate’s version of VAWA, saying that parts of the bill are unconstitutional.

Nevertheless, Cantor’s warning may have had an effect. When the bill came to the floor on Wednesday, only nine Republicans voted against the rule to take up the bill.

Tensions between backbenchers and leadership, however, are evident, and the whip on the rule took over an hour. Eventually, the rule passed, 414–9, and the House plans a final vote on the Senate’s version of VAWA on Thursday.

The nine who voted against the rule include Georgia Senate candidate Paul Broun and potential Iowa Senate candidate Steve King.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cantor; ericcantor; georgia; gop; iowa; paulbroun; rino; steveking; vawa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: sheikdetailfeather
It expands the definition of domestic violence to include causing “emotional distress” or using “unpleasant speech.

I'm toast. You should have heard me when one of the catz got caught eating my jalapeno seedlings for this year's garden. I caused "emotional distress" and used "unpleasant speech". Most of it learned from a TI in basic training back in the old days when the AF wasn't quite such a chair force.

/johnny

21 posted on 02/27/2013 5:31:33 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
WHY OBAMA WINS: DEMOCRATS PURGE MODERATES, REPUBLICANS PURGE CONSERVATIVES

Voters already "purged" most of the liberal and moderate Republicans. They didn't purge moderate Democrats, so there are more than a few in Congress for the party to purge.

If one or two conservative Republicans in Congress lose out to other Republicans who have more seniority or who play nice with the leadership it doesn't exactly qualify as a purge.

Republicans are preparing for a major debate on immigration reform by purging the party’s conservatives, casting opponents of bipartisan legislative efforts as bigots who will doom the party to ongoing electoral failure.

If that's true it may just be for appearances' sake, a strategic division of labor as some Republicans move closer to Obama and others further away. Some need to appear accomodationist and others need to appear inflexible. If they're smart they'll find a way to defeat Obama's plan that lets both groups appeal to their constituencies.

22 posted on 02/27/2013 5:31:56 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

The Civil War won’t be just about 1 party fighting. The country is divided to the point where party affiliation won’t matter.

It will be the makers against the takers.


23 posted on 02/27/2013 5:33:59 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

bfl


24 posted on 02/27/2013 5:45:35 PM PST by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

It won’t be a CW...It would be Revolution II against the elite ever controlling government ruling class and tax paying surfs and peon private sector class.


25 posted on 02/27/2013 5:46:34 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

FUEC


26 posted on 02/27/2013 5:52:11 PM PST by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Bring it on, Eric. You’ll end up in the dumpster with crybaby Boehner, Linda Graham, and the Shamnesty Sheik, John McLame.
Oh, yeah, and those two tapeworms, Cochran and Johanns.


27 posted on 02/27/2013 5:52:26 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
The Senate bill expands “coverage” to men, homosexuals, transgendered individuals and prisoners. It expands the definition of domestic violence to include causing “emotional distress” or using “unpleasant speech."

Good grief. This is insanity. Eric Cantor does not have a clue what he's doing.
28 posted on 02/27/2013 5:53:10 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
creating law that applies only to a certain class of person, such as this one and the HATE CRIMES law against LBGT and all ethnic groups except for caucasian goes against the very grain of equality of justice our own liberty is dependent upon to even exist as a cohesive society under the law. We are now witnessing what unequal justice is doing to this country and yet Cantor and the other RINO jackasses remain on the same path of devision as the democraps. These people aren’t stupid but they are traitors and they're weakening our country from within. The KARMA of OUR COMPLACENCY is haunting.
29 posted on 02/27/2013 6:17:23 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Probably not. These guys who own casinos are ‘takers’ yet we’ll be tapping them for bullet money eh!


30 posted on 02/27/2013 6:18:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

We need the Violence Against Left handed People Act now, VLPA is needed as soon as possible, come on Republicans, pass it now!!!!!!!!!!!!


31 posted on 02/27/2013 6:20:05 PM PST by IslamE (epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Even better.


32 posted on 02/27/2013 6:27:33 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

Now LISTEN! I want:

1. Amnesty for Illegals

2. Allow the military to be destroyed because the Sequestration cuts will stand

3. And the "Violence Against Women Act" will allow women to get men arrested with no charges filed

Now why are you people opposing me!


33 posted on 02/27/2013 6:36:35 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
What do we have against the Violence Against Women Act?

Well, first of all, violence against women is already illegal, as is violence against anyone.

What this act does is allocate a bunch more taxpayer money to fund a bureaucracy that distributes even more tax dollars to various groups, including gay rights and illegal immigrant rights groups.

Given its name, it's one hell of a tool in the public opinion war against conservatives. "By voting this down, Republicans have shown that they are OK with violence against women!!!"

The left could name a bill the "Save the Puppies and Kitties Act" and load it up with pork and slip in all sorts of unconstitutional provisions. Then sit back and chuckle when, as the conservatives oppose it, the voters that are as stupid as the left hopes we all are wonder what the conservatives have against puppies and kitties.

34 posted on 02/27/2013 6:40:35 PM PST by Washi (PUSH BACK! Encourage your legislators to introduce pro-second amendment legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Washi

We need to apply or a grant (for new equipment, more staff) ~ we’d do that as a way to develop programs to protect TRADITIONALISTS against violence by ANTI TRADITIONALISTS.


35 posted on 02/27/2013 6:51:12 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

The Act is a year piece of bull the democrats drag out to beat the Republicans over the head. The Jew from VA is an idiot RINO fool.


36 posted on 02/27/2013 6:56:09 PM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
Obviously tied into the gun control push. There will be thousands of domestic violence charges to come. When the stepson announces he's moving back in and he's also quiting his job the same day, maybe we can have him charged with “unpleasant speech” and giving us “emotional distress.”
37 posted on 02/27/2013 6:58:33 PM PST by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
What do we have against the Violence Against Women Act?

Oh, a few things. Raised your voice during an argument? Domestic violence. Didn't tell the wife about that bonus? Financial domestic violence. Slammed a door a little out of frustration? Domestic violence. Didn't do a dang thing but she wants the upper hand in divorce court? Domestic violence

Then kiss you 2A rights goodby.

38 posted on 02/27/2013 7:12:51 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; AuntB; stephenjohnbanker; ...
RE :”House majority leader Eric Cantor is increasingly frustrated with a group of House Republicans who are working against the leadership, and he’s not afraid of voicing his dismay.
In a closed-door conference meeting on Wednesday, Cantor told one GOP member that if they blocked the Senate-passed Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) from coming to the floor, they’d cause “civil war” in the ranks.
Cantor’s comment irked some Republican aides, who told National Review Online that such strong language is inappropriate. In recent days, some conservatives have been upset about the Senate’s version of VAWA, saying that parts of the bill are unconstitutional.
Nevertheless, Cantor’s warning may have had an effect. When the bill came to the floor on Wednesday, only nine Republicans voted against the rule to take up the bill. “

This reminds me of 2006 when the GOP congress re-authorized the voting rights act 100% AS IS by a huge GOP majority with GWB signing it, now the Southern States cant pass new voter ID laws because of it. And minorities voted against them in 2006 and 2008 and 2012 anyway. It bought them nothing good,

I always said Cantor is a lib who hides it with woof-woof.

39 posted on 02/27/2013 7:16:00 PM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to Dems and Obama is not a principle! Its just losing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

The GOP is dead but doesn’t know it yet. The Constitutional Republic built by the founders is a long-lost dream that will never be regained. The Ruling Class is all-powerful and cannot be stopped because the dumb-masses are too comfortable and ignorant to care what happens to America.

I’m not sure if I have the stomach to stay in this country much longer. This is like watching a loved one slowly die from cancer.


40 posted on 02/27/2013 7:17:55 PM PST by EricT. (The Second Amendment is Tyrant Control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson