Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Oh, Please, The White House Didn't 'Threaten' Bob Woodward


2 posted on 02/27/2013 8:11:02 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blam

Bump


3 posted on 02/27/2013 8:13:34 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Sperling wasn't even saying that Woodward would "regret" publishing whatever he planned to publish because Sperling would get him back for it later. He was saying Woodward would regret it because Woodward would be proven wrong.

Ha, this guy has got to be kidding. If "He was saying Woodward would regret it because Woodward would be proven wrong", then that's what he would have said. Anybody over the age of eight knows that the level of vagueness of the threat should be interpreted to be the level of violence implied.

22 posted on 02/27/2013 9:14:11 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson