Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spokeskid Jay Carney Says Old Man Woodward Has His Head in the Sand
Rush Limbaugh ^ | February 28, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/28/2013 4:23:38 PM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I should say I've been keeping track of this at PJ Media.

AARP is not happy with David Plouffe's tweet about Woodward being too old to do his job well anymore. They are not happy about it. There's nothing they can do about it but they're not happy about it. Woodward is the first guy to actually draw blood from this regime in five years -- and that, the regime doesn't like.

Our old buddy Ron Fournier at the National Journal has a piece about this, and he said you people are being bamboozled if you think this is about threats.

The reason this story is important to you has nothing to do with threats. "The fight between the White House and journalistic legend Bob Woodward is a silly distraction to a major problem: The failure of President Obama and House Republicans to lead the country under a budget deadline. Woodward-gate is a distraction the White House welcomed, even encouraged, as part of a public-relations strategy to emasculate the GOP and anybody else who challenges Obama."

This is Ron Fournier writing this! This guy's a former lapdog.

"It is a distraction that briefly enveloped my reporting last weekend, when I essentially broke ties with a senior White House official. Yes, I iced a source -- and my only regret is I didn't do it sooner. I decided to share this encounter because it might shed light on the increasingly toxic relationship between media and government, which is why the Woodward flap matters outside the Beltway."

I don't know about that. I don't think it's "toxic."

I think these two sides love each other too much. I think Obama loves the media too much and the media certainly love him too much. It may be a stretch to say he loves them, but he appreciates the fact that they're in his back pocket or that they have been there. At any rate, "On Saturday, White House press secretary Jay Carney accused Woodward of being 'willfully wrong' on a story holding the White House accountable for its part in a legislative gimmick called sequestration. ...

"Carney isn't the first press secretary to criticize a reporter. Presidential aides do it all the time..." Fournier writes, "I had angered the White House... Going back to my first political beat, covering Bill Clinton's administration in Arkansas and later in Washington, I've had a practice that is fairly common in journalism: A handful of sources I deal with regularly are granted blanket anonymity. Any time we communicate, they know I am prepared to report the information at will ... and that I will not attribute it to them."

Anyway, his point here is that this Woodward flap is a distraction that the White House is encouraging as part of a PR strategy to emasculate the Republicans and anybody else that challenges Obama and that, "It is a distraction that briefly enveloped my reporting last weekend, when I essentially broke ties with a senior White House official," meaning he now identifies him. Now, Fournier's close here. This is about emasculating the GOP. I don't know if he gets it. Maybe he does.

This is about making sure the GOP gets blamed for everything -- and, see, that's where Woodward went off the reservation. That's what I think everybody's missing. Everybody thinks that Sperling is mad at Woodward for writing that the regime is moving the goalposts -- meaning: "Making it impossible for there to be a deal," which the White House does not want. I think what they're really mad about is that Woodward is telling everybody that the sequester was Obama's idea.

That's what undercuts the regime. The regime's whole premise is based on making people think this is a Republican idea -- and here is Mr. Watergate Emeritus, Mr. Beyond Reproach, Mr. Credibility, Bob Woodward, saying, "No, no, no! The president came up with this idea," and he's written it two or three times. The public blames the Republicans. It's been a successful campaign. That's why they're mad at Woodward, because Woodward's out there saying that it's not the Republicans. It's Obama who did this.

Remember when President Obama supported the sequester cuts?

In one sense, folks, this is rather serious. We've kind of been dealing with it in the typical, low-information voter way here today, but in one sense this is serious. Because it is a grand strategy, and it is all part of making sure that Obama doesn't get blamed for anything. It's all part of Obama's grand strategy to never have an agreement. When Fournier writes here that "it's a distraction to a major problem, the failure of Obama and the White House to lead the country..."

Obama is not interested in an agreement with the Republicans. Ever! That would undercut the entire modus operandi, because when he comes to an agreement on anything, that means his name is on it. That means whatever happens after that is tied to him, in part, and that's what he does not want now. Because what's ahead of us is more disaster. That's got to be seen as the Republicans' fault, and theirs alone. That's the strategy. The immediate thing it's about is the continuing resolution fight at the end of March.

The next thing it's about is the 2014 midterms.

The next thing it's about is eliminating the Republican Party as a viable opponent.

That's the agenda here, and that's why there isn't gonna be any agreement with the Republicans on fixing anything.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, let's go to the sound bites and the White House press briefing here this afternoon. Jay Carney got a question from Jessica Yellin. "The President said last night that this is not a cliff, it's a tumble downward."

Grab sound bite number nine. The broadcast engineer's gonna go nuts. This is what she's referring to, asking a question of Jay Carney. Obama's been singing these songs of utter panic, disaster, Armageddon for the past month. But last night, he said this...

OBAMA: This is not a cliff, but it is a tumble downward. It's conceivable that in the first week, the first two weeks, first three weeks, first month, a lot of people may not notice the full impact of the sequester. But this is going to be a big hit on the economy.

RUSH: Oh, he's getting cold feet out there. It's not gonna be noticeable now. So a CNN infobabe asks Carney about this. "Is he concerned that you guys overstated this, Jay?"

CARNEY: It's our responsibility to be upfront about the fact that you cannot responsibly cut $85 billion out of the budget in seven months without having -- in... in the way that the law has designed -- without having dramatic effects on, y'know, the defense industry and civilian defense workers, on our national security readiness, or teachers, uh, on kids in Head Start. That's just a fact. What the president said last night is that -- what other people have said is that this will be a rolling impact, an effect that will build and build and build.

RUSH: No, Jay.

That's not what he said.

What he said is, it's so damned inconsequential you're not gonna be able to see it! That's what he said, because it's CYA time. Up until yesterday, it's been Armageddon. "It's the end of everything as we know it!" But it isn't gonna be. So he had to basically say to people, "You know, you might not even see it for a month." That $85 billion? A, it isn't $85 billion. Again, in terms of defense, it's $22 billion in the next seven months, toward the end of the year. Next question. Jessica Yellin of CNN said to Jay Carney, "So when Gene Sperling told Bob Woodward that he might 'regret' his reporting, what was intended by that, Jay?"

CARNEY: It would be a responsible thing to ask that question in the context of the full e-mail since we know what the full e-mail said. (soft tone) Where Gene Sperling was incredibly respectful, referred to Mr. Woodward as his friend, and apologized for raising his voice. I think you cannot read those e-mails and come away with the impression that Gene was threatening anybody. The point that Gene was making is a point that I've made and others have made and the president has made. This is really important policy, and one thing that is absolutely irrefutable is that the president, from day one of signing the Budget Control Act, has been absolutely clear that in dealing with deficit reduction going forward, he believed we had to have balance. You'd have to have your head in the sand not to know that!

RUSH: Bob Woodward has his head in the sand.

Bob Woodward's head was in the sand.

By the way, it took 18 minutes to get to this question today. Had a Republican administration threatened Bob Woodward, it would have been the first and only question that Carney was asked. So then, Ed Henry of Fox News said, "You were just telling Jessica the 'tone' of that e-mail from Sperling was respectful. Well, last night on Twitter, David Plouffe put out a tweet basically comparing Woodward to an aging baseball player who's lost his talent. The tweet belittled Woodward. Do you think that's respectful, Jay? Is that something the White House also supports?"

CARNEY: There was an accusation that Gene had been threatening, and that's hard to believe. Gene has been working on these issues all his life. He is very passionate about them. Uh, he works 20 hours a day often on behalf of the American people and this president to try advance, uh, an economic agenda, uh, that, uh, helps, uh --

RUSH: What a load of absolute drivel.

CARNEY: -- middle-class Americans, average Americans, uhhh, and he'll continue to do that. Look, I have enormous respect for, uhhh, the work that Bob Woodward is famous for. (pause) You know, we had a factual disagreement, uhhh, that I think, you know, we stand by.

RUSH: (translated) "We stand by the Plouffe tweet. Woodward is an aging dinosaur who isn't any good anymore and his head's in the sand. I used to respect the stuff he did in the last century back during the founding. Woodward was really good back in the 1800s, Ed, but no more. He's lost it -- and, by the way, Sperling? This guy works 20 hours a day on the economy, trying to improve the American people's economic lives!" Sperling yelled at Woodward for a half an hour before that e-mail was sent. Sperling was yelling at Woodward, according to Woodward. Before Carney became the White House press secretary, I guarantee you that Woodward was one of his heroes.

I guarantee it.

Ah, I know he's got a job to do now. He's gotta get up there defend Obama. By the way, Ron Fournier, that he's where he said everybody's misguided by this. Let me read to you how Ron Fournier ended this piece about the Woodward business. Listen to this: "This can't be what Obama wants." Oh, no-o-o! Obama "must not know how thin-skinned and close-minded his staff can be to criticism." So, not only Woodward, but now the Ron Fournier says: Boy, Obama, this can't be what he wants. He doesn't want his guys threatening reporters. This can't possibly be what he wants! You know, Obama really ought to look into how thin-skinned some of his staff is.

The "thin skin" is Obama who has led a charmed, protected life -- and if anybody can't deal with any criticism, it's Obama. I'm sorry. It's the way it is.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; genesperling; partisanmediashills; sequester

1 posted on 02/28/2013 4:23:44 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’ll take an old man Woodward with his head in the sand versus a young lying stooge, Carney, with his head up Obama’s ass.

Checkmate!


2 posted on 02/28/2013 4:28:22 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whether Woodward has his head in the sand or not, is not the issue. I am pretty sure this group of slime bags could make him disappear forever. I firmly believe that.


3 posted on 02/28/2013 4:32:09 PM PST by Mark17 (California, where English is a foreign language)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I don't see Woodward as a distraction. I see him as a chink in the media's armor. Just like Eastwood is a crack in Hollywood's stone wall and Dr. Carson is a weakness in the black force field.

Obama's support is beginning to fray.

4 posted on 02/28/2013 4:33:20 PM PST by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Isn’t it funny how all the liberals thought he was okay when it was Nixon and a Republican. What made the change? Is it because suddenly it is a Democrat he is critisizing?


5 posted on 02/28/2013 4:38:20 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

We need one more media icon to publicly agree with Woodward and tweaks his own question. Also, someone needs to open up another front against Obama.

Impeachment by 1000 cuts.


6 posted on 02/28/2013 4:43:13 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Got a problem? Nothing a drone strike can't fix.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When the MSM has its head in the sand, it’s a$$ is just where Obama likes it.


7 posted on 02/28/2013 4:43:13 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent
It’s a lock-think thing. He dared show a bit of independent thinking so they will eviscerated him. And the funny part is he is truly onto a story this time, not a little thing blown all out of proportion like Watergate. But he’s a liberal and they are not exactly known for their bravery, so he’ll soon get back on the plantation.
8 posted on 02/28/2013 4:53:39 PM PST by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does Woodward really still have the balls to report on an Administration, or. Is the White Hut right that Woodward is washed up?

Which is it, Bob?


9 posted on 02/28/2013 4:58:41 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wonder how many other rat voters are out there getting nervous as they realize how they have been had. Some folks (the relatively intelligent and honest ones) are starting to notice the man behind the screen.


10 posted on 02/28/2013 5:01:07 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...David Plouffe's tweet about Woodward being too old to do his job well anymore.

How old was Robert Novak when he started the whole Valerie Plame scandal, 72? Although he didn't know it yet, was he already suffering from cancer?

And yet, he wasn't too old to do his job if it hurt Bush, right?

-PJ

11 posted on 02/28/2013 5:06:49 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.

The ignorant voters will never get it


12 posted on 02/28/2013 5:07:26 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; tubebender; NormsRevenge; calif_reaganite; ...
During one of Rush's obscene profit breaks today I punched the button for Dennis Prager and he had the best observation. His was by far the most sinister of anyone.

He said in effect that Woodward trying to say the if Obama only knew what his staff was doing to threaten him, that Obama would probably not stand for it and blow off the threatening rhetoric!

This reminded him of loyal Soviet Communists being murdered after being tortured by Stalin who would seriously say as they were being butchered; "If only comrade Joseph knew this was happening, he would certainly put a stop to it!"

Chilling how similar that was to exactly what Woodward said today to try to give Obama the benefit of the same type of doubt!!!

13 posted on 02/28/2013 5:10:16 PM PST by SierraWasp (Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

I was talking to a coworker who voted twice fore Obama and she said “I thought Obama would do good things for us, but now I don’t believe he will, he doesn’t intend to help us” Man, did I ever have to bite my tongue not to say the obvious....


14 posted on 02/28/2013 5:22:01 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

I was talking to a coworker who voted twice fore Obama and she said “I thought Obama would do good things for us, but now I don’t believe he will, he doesn’t intend to help us” Man, did I ever have to bite my tongue not to say the obvious....


15 posted on 02/28/2013 5:22:01 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Obviously, she as a job. Tell her to quit the job, then Obama will help her, with your money, of course.


16 posted on 02/28/2013 5:30:25 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Carney reminds me of Kevin Bacon’s character, “Chip Diller”, from “Animal House”: “ALL IS WELL!!! ALL IS WELL!!!”


17 posted on 02/28/2013 5:42:32 PM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I haven’t seen anyone comment on a certain bit of irony associated with this incident. Woodward made a name for himself with Watergate. One reason why the press pursued Watergate so energetically was that Nixon and his V.P. Agnew had antagonized the press. Agnew went around making speeches where he criticized the press, famously calling them effete snobs. Nixon thought the press was out to get him. It was kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

And now here is Obama antagonizing Woodward and others in the press.


18 posted on 02/28/2013 5:57:48 PM PST by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
AARP is not happy with David Plouffe's tweet about Woodward being too old to do his job well anymore.

Now THERE'S a dilemma. Actually, it's phoney one.

They certainly have to publicly defend old people, but behind the scenes, they are still kissing obama's butt as usual. All they care about old people is that they buy insurance through them and that they keep voting for lefties.

In a match between old folks and young commies, AARP takes youth every time.

19 posted on 02/28/2013 6:24:50 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

Uh,

I remember the enemies list, the breakin,
the tapes, the gaps in the tapes.


20 posted on 02/28/2013 8:30:14 PM PST by theneanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theneanderthal

Yeah, well... nobody was strangely allowed to be slaughtered at Watergate, like in Benghazi... This stuff all smacks of a much darker side than Tricky Dick!!!


21 posted on 02/28/2013 8:45:25 PM PST by SierraWasp (Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFvujknrBuE

22 posted on 03/01/2013 4:34:08 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDAmPIq29ro




23 posted on 03/01/2013 4:41:14 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Agnew went around making speeches where he criticized the press, famously calling them effete snobs.

Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel.

24 posted on 03/01/2013 4:42:58 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; Jim Robinson
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel.

Or...

...owns a website called FreeRepublic!


; ^ )

25 posted on 03/01/2013 4:44:48 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Carney isn’t qualified to shine Woodward’s shoes.


26 posted on 03/01/2013 10:30:25 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson