Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
He's not going anywhere, 'cause he's got this database with information about everything on every individual. I'll bet that's what she meant, Snerdley. That 2016 isn't a big deal 'cause he's not going anywhere.

You know, sometimes I wish Rush would just chill a bit on the conspiracy nonsense (even if he's just doing the illustrating absurdity by being absurd thing).

What Maxine Waters is talking about is how The Obama "database" will just be passed along to whoever the Dem 2016 candidate is ... giving that candidate an incredibly powerful tool with which to do things like micro-targeting.

The real issue here is that Obama has such a database, and you have a senior member of Congress telling the world that it contains information on EVERYONE.

That's a MASSIVE privacy issue. What kinds of information does it contain, where did the information come from and how is it being used? Should people be allowed to demand to see what information it contains on them (like can sometimes be done with a FOIA request)?

Unfortunately Rush overshadows the real problem here by taking the discussion down an absurd path to an absurd conclusion.
11 posted on 03/02/2013 12:06:07 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

“The real issue here is that Obama has such a database, and you have a senior member of Congress telling the world that it contains information on EVERYONE.

That’s a MASSIVE privacy issue. What kinds of information does it contain, where did the information come from “

Probably got it from d—n Google! I HATE Google!


16 posted on 03/02/2013 12:24:30 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: tanknetter

My thoughts exactly. I would like to demand to see this database which sounds like an invasion of my privacy.


22 posted on 03/02/2013 1:05:02 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: tanknetter

I disagree, tank.

I think Rush is just highlighting the basic incoherence and stupidity of this woman after her recent “170 million lost jobs” comment, not to mention her 20 years worth of other public idiocy.


33 posted on 03/02/2013 2:21:37 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: tanknetter

‘..What Maxine Waters is talking about is how The Obama “database” will just be passed along to whoever the Dem 2016 candidate is ... giving that candidate an incredibly powerful tool with which to do things like micro-targeting. ..’

My take too with a little twist....may be that her point is Obama has info on potential Republican/Conservative candidates that Dems will use to defeat opponents and help get another lib Dem elected in 2016. Soooo people don’t have to worry ....they’ll continue to get free stuff since another left liberal will be elected after Obama. God help us.


50 posted on 03/02/2013 5:39:17 PM PST by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson