The devil’s always in the details.
So, if I’m going on vacation and leave my guns with my neighbor, and his kid is, unknown to me, illegally doing controlled substances, then it appears that I’m screwed unless I can prove that I didn’t know the kid was doing oxycontin.
Is that right???
posted on 03/04/2013 7:55:44 PM PST
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
I didn’t read the whole thing but it appears you’d have to either know or have a reasonable suspicion that such was going on. Of course, our masters get to decide what “reasonable” means.
posted on 03/05/2013 3:58:19 AM PST
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
unless I can prove that I didnt know the kid was doing oxycontin.
Good luck proving a negative !!
We have enough laws, it is time to disband the District of Corruption, or at least make the Congresscritters work from their home districts and states and only go to the corruption district a couple of times a session. THAT WILL MAKE THEM FEEL THE HEAT OF THEIR CONSTITUENTS BACK HOME. There is way too much mischief going on back there on the east coast when out of sight of the folk who put them there. The district turns them - almost 95% of all the go to work there.
posted on 03/05/2013 5:55:13 AM PST
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson