Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The president who cried ‘Sequester!’
AEI ^ | 3/4/13 | Marc Thiessen

Posted on 03/06/2013 8:13:26 AM PST by MissTed

The sequester is only four days old and it has already done untold damage — not to teachers, air traffic controllers, or the military, mind you, but to President Obama’s credibility.

Obama has been caught in one misstatement after another about the sequester — from lying to Americans about its origins to exaggerating its impact. Obama is fast becoming the president who cried “Sequester!” And the price he pays for his exaggerations will be lasting.

The first untruth came on October 22, 2012, during Obama’s final debate with Mitt Romney, when Obama declared, “The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed. It is something that Congress has proposed.” When everyone from Bob Woodward to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Max Baucus came out and said it was indeed the president’s idea, White House spokesman Jay Carney was finally forced to admit that “the sequester was one of the ideas put forward, yes, by the president’s team.”

Then President Obama began issuing apocalyptic warnings of the plagues and pestilence that would soon descend upon the land if the sequester took effect: “Border Patrol agents will see their hours reduced. FBI agents will be furloughed. Federal prosecutors will have to close cases and let criminals go. Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country. Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off. Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care like flu vaccinations and cancer screenings.”

His claims were so obviously overwrought that, when the sequester finally happened, Obama backtracked, declaring, “This is not going to be [an] apocalypse, as some people have said.” Some people have said? Not some people, Mr. President. You and your senior officials.

It was your secretary of education, Arne Duncan, who said last week that there are “literally now teachers who are getting pink slips” because of the sequester. But it turned out there are no pink slips going out. The charge was just flat untrue. Asked where Duncan got the information, his spokesman said it was from “an unspecified call he was on with unnamed persons.” Seriously?

It was your department of homeland security that announced that hundreds of illegal aliens facing deportation had been released from immigration jails due to the sequester. There is no way the sequester required letting those folks go. It costs about $122 per day to keep an illegal immigrant facing deportation jailed.

It was your secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, who warned in a Feb. 1 letter that 70,000 students would see their Head Start program shut down — only to have her spokesman walk back the claim, telling POLITICO last week the number “should not be taken literally and serves as an estimate based on ‘historic funding levels.’”

It was you, Mr. President, who declared at a press conference just one day before the sequester took effect that, “starting tomorrow, everybody here, cleaning the floors at the Capitol, they’re going to have less pay. The janitors, the security guards. They just got a pay cut… That’s real.” Except it’s not. The Capitol superintendent sent out an email to his alarmed staff reassuring them Obama’s statement was “NOT true.” The Senate Sergeant-at-Arms declared, “None of my employees will have their pay cut nor will they face furloughs” and that the Capitol police “will face neither pay cuts nor furloughs; they are standing tall through sequestration and all.”

The administration’s claims that the sequester was somebody else’s idea — and its warnings of impending disaster — are either highly exaggerated or made up from whole cloth. Yes, the sequester needs to be fixed — not because the cuts are too deep, but because they slash both critical programs (like national defense) and wasteful ones without discrimination. As I have pointed out here and here, those problems are fixable.

What may not be fixable is the damage Obama has done to his reputation with his exaggerated claims of imminent doom. When you cry wolf, and people figure it out, they don’t take your cries seriously any more. The next time Obama warns us of a coming disaster, Americans will be forgiven for thinking: “Remember what he said about the sequester?”

TOPICS: Politics/Elections
But the mewling press still has his back.
1 posted on 03/06/2013 8:13:33 AM PST by MissTed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissTed

We could hardly go safely from place to place yesterday because of all the airliners falling from the skies.

Then we had to be on constant alert for collapsing bridges.

It was sheer heck!


2 posted on 03/06/2013 8:22:11 AM PST by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

0 will not pay any price where it is needed—among the morons who voted for him.

3 posted on 03/06/2013 8:22:18 AM PST by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

Here’s another theory: Woudln’t it be ironic if The Sequester becomes Obama’s greatest legacy?

From a hypothetical future history book...

“Stuck in gridlock between a Republican House bent on federal spending cuts and a Democratic Senate, President Barack Obama is best known for The Sequester, which is now credited with putting the US on the long path to austerity and economic reform. Obama first proposed the Sequester in 2011 as a tactic to force Republicans to accede to tax increases, but after it actually went into effect and demonstrated the ability to operate the federal government without a budget increase, the stage was set for further reductions as fiscally conservative Republicans were able to take control of Congress in 2014 and the Presidency in 2016. Even Obamas national healthcare program known as “Obamacare” was repealed in large part as the size of the federal government was scaled-back throughout the next decade”.

4 posted on 03/06/2013 8:33:45 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
“Even Obamas national healthcare program known as “Obamacare” was repealed in large part as the size of the federal government was scaled-back throughout the next decade”.”

The only problem with that scenario is that “Obamacare” will actually save the country money and reduce the deficit!!!!!!!

How in the world did he manage to get away with that whopper?

5 posted on 03/06/2013 8:42:50 AM PST by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissTed

The magic negro lies?
Who knew he EVER tells the truth.
Marxist? Oh no,
Fag? oh no,
marriage to unAmerican wookie bitch a sham marriage? Oh no,
I can go on but ya gets the idea.

6 posted on 03/06/2013 10:47:23 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissTed


7 posted on 03/06/2013 4:41:09 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson