Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MichaelCorleone
‘LIKELY’ armed or not. Nice. Bad as this already is, they won’t even be sure the Americans they kill are even armed or not.

I don't believe that even the Obama/Holder/Napolitano type of jackbooted thug would authorize a drone strike against an American citizen, simply for being "likely armed." But such a report by a recon drone would more likely be used as probable cause for more sophisticated surveillance ... or even a "stop and frisk" by two or more police officers, who are far more heavily armed than the "likely armed" individual.

18 posted on 03/06/2013 9:08:06 AM PST by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan

“or even a “stop and frisk” by two or more police officers, who are far more heavily armed than the “likely armed” individual.”

With the attacks on our Rights becoming, if not more common, then more open, I would invite the usual suspects to this thread to discuss the use of drones to spy on citizens, and also the “stop and frisk” which several members here think is just a dandy crime fighting tool.


24 posted on 03/06/2013 9:21:06 AM PST by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson