Skip to comments.Barack Obama 'has authority to use drone strikes to kill Americans on US soil' [ I N S A N I T Y ]
Posted on 03/06/2013 9:11:11 PM PST by NoLibZone
President Barack Obama has the authority to use an unmanned drone strike to kill US citizens on American soil, his attorney general has said.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
He can kill anyone of us without due process using the US Military to do so.
Obama must be arrested at once.
Citizen armed drones are radar-proof and unstoppable- cf JFK
Congress can go too, for passing laws and exempting themselves from its statutes.
We either live free or end up as slaves to a corrupt system.
Could B. Hussein Obama pass an FBI background check for possession of a firearm?
This is no longer America. Its the Peoples Democratic Republic of Obamania
“He can kill anyone of us without due process using the US Military to do so.”
Where does the article say that? What are the exact words?
“President Barack Obama has the authority to use an unmanned drone strike to kill US citizens on American soil, his attorney general has said.”
Outline the chain of due process that allows for the use of the US Military to kill a US Citizen on US Soil.
obama, holder, napalitano, and company. arrested, tried, convicted, and locked up for a long time.
no, libtardia. obama ain’t big enuf to earn the name of the fubar today.
and democrats in senate defend this? They must feel safe
but about that waterboarding...now THAT is cruel and unconstitutional
insane - hippo-crits!
What if the headline was “President Palin has the authority to use drones to kill Americans on American soil”???
ask Janet Holder, I dont believe she was held to account for doing so at Waco
also remember the 82d airborne (?- General Honore) was deployed to NO after Katrina and they werent armed with phasers set to stun
ahhhh, make that Janet Reno
He most certainly does not.
It’s not necessarily the military that will be piloting the drones - DHS could have that ability as well. No Posse Comitatus violation occurs if that’s the case.
Holder murdered scores of children at WACO.
Of course he wants to murder Americans.
Janet Reno, but Holder was the executor.
The Democratic party has an unbroken line of murder back to Bill Clinton.
No he does not. Doesn’t matter what he or the ag says. He does not have the right.
BTW the “justice” department is criminal, for deliberately refusing to prosecute black panthers for a real crime.
Hey, no worries. Chics get free rubbers, so its all good!
It won’t end well for the dictator. It never does.
So you're using that as justification for this: He can kill anyone of us without due process using the US Military to do so.
Your justification doesn't say "kill anyone", it doesn't even say "kill any US citizen"; it says "kill US citizens" clearly indicating "some" but not necessarily "any" or "all".
Your justification doesn't say "without due process". It doesn't address the matter at all. It mentions "authority", but for all you know the "authority" is limited by the requirements of due process."
Your justification doesn't say anything about the US military. They aren't the only ones to have drones.
US Constitution, Article II, Section 2, "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States..." and Article I, Section 8, "The Congress shall have Power...; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;"
Of course, you changed the focus and the above does not mean, as you wrote, He can kill anyone of us without due process using the US Military to do so.
The civil rights folks around here sure are johnny come lately’s. Let me get this straight - Dubya locking up US citizens forever and depriving them of habeus corpus - cool. Obama killing them - not cool?