Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton says anti-gay marriage law he signed should be overturned
Reuters ^ | Thu Mar 7, 2013 11:26pm EST | Peter Cooney

Posted on 03/07/2013 9:37:43 PM PST by Olog-hai

Former President Bill Clinton, who in 1996 signed into law an act defining marriage as between a man and woman, said on Thursday the measure was unconstitutional and should be overturned by the Supreme Court. …

Noting that the Supreme Court will hear arguments on March 27 challenging the constitutionality of DOMA, Clinton wrote the justices “must decide whether it is consistent with the principles of a nation that honors freedom, equality and justice above all, and is therefore constitutional. As the president who signed the act into law, I have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and in fact, incompatible with our Constitution.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: billclinton; doma; gaymafia; gaymarriage; hillary; homosexualagenda; humaabedin; lavendermafia; sodomandgomorrah
Riiight; the president who was pushing for gays in the military even before his first term started only has “come to believe” these liberal “principles” rather than having believed them for decades.
1 posted on 03/07/2013 9:37:47 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Have Rand Paul ask Bill Clinton if he signed any OTHER unconstitutional laws.


2 posted on 03/07/2013 9:38:32 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The man lives with a woman reputed to be partnered with Huma. He isn’t new to “alternative lifestyle” arrangements.


3 posted on 03/07/2013 9:39:21 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

DOMA simpley says that the individual states have the right to recognize or not recognize faggot “marriage” as they see fit, right? Where on earth does the Constitution say the feds can take over that power from the states?


4 posted on 03/07/2013 9:47:15 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Clinton and principles don’t belong in the same universe.


5 posted on 03/07/2013 9:56:35 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Nothing like an ex-President sticking his nose into private States votes. Seems to be an epidemic these days though.

I’d guess that most of these folks believe in National laws rather than State laws - ie. in total disregard of the Constitution!


6 posted on 03/07/2013 9:59:44 PM PST by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Is his signing this an impeachable offense?


7 posted on 03/07/2013 10:14:12 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The Defense of Marriage Act also says that, for all purposes of federal law, that marriage is a man and a woman, regardless of how any states define marriage.

I don’t get how there is any constitutional violation regarding defining marriage for purposes of legal benefits, etc. based on marital status. But then again, I’m not liberal, so don’t have the unique insights that liberals have. (sarcasm)


8 posted on 03/07/2013 10:19:35 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Isn’t DOMA also “anti-polygamist?” I guess ol’ Bill wants to add to his stable of ladies....


9 posted on 03/07/2013 10:31:48 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"Bill Clinton says anti-gay marriage law he signed should be overturned"

Slick willy must have finally found his true love.
10 posted on 03/07/2013 10:42:45 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The Defense of Marriage Act also says that, for all purposes of federal law, that marriage is a man and a woman, regardless of how any states define marriage.

Yes. After posting, I researched further and found this out. It's a good law. Funny how the impeached Sink Masturbator now says it's "unconstitutional", but apparently didn't think so when he signed the bill into law.

11 posted on 03/07/2013 11:40:10 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
>> Former President Bill Clinton, who in 1996 signed into law an act defining marriage as between a man and woman, said on Thursday the measure was unconstitutional <<


"I woulda vetoed at the time if I realized it was unconstitutional, shucks, I missed the fine print cuz I was busy gettin' served by Monica. Give a guy a break!"

12 posted on 03/08/2013 12:43:17 AM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As the wind blows so blows a wish washy Clinton.


13 posted on 03/08/2013 3:41:54 AM PST by chainsaw ("Two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

It’s a little like the anti-sodomy law in the military, When it was repealed, bestiality became legal.


14 posted on 03/08/2013 4:38:45 AM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

so, pretty much this means Hillary is running for prezzy..


15 posted on 03/08/2013 5:16:59 AM PST by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Argus

Old Bill always has his finger in the wind, and can blow any way it tells him to.

Maybe I shouldn’t use the word blow and Clinton in the same sentence.


16 posted on 03/08/2013 5:18:12 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

When that law was passed, homosexual marriage was not a liberal cause. The vote in Congress was overwhelming. Check the roll call vote, and you would be surprised to see that liberals such as Chuck Schumer, Joe Lieberman, Tom Harkin, Pat Leahy, voted for it.

Only 17 years ago, liberals could say that marriage was a man and a woman. Now if you say that, liberals call you a bigot and Neanderthal. Its funny how these liberals are given a pass on their support of this hated (by gay activists) law.

Would love to ask Bill Clinton follow up questions. If this law is so obviously unconstitutional, then why in the sam hill did he sign it?


17 posted on 03/08/2013 7:24:34 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“If this law is so obviously unconstitutional, then why in the sam hill did he sign it?”

Clinton:

“With federal lawmakers then debating various responses, “some quite draconian,” many supporters of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, believed its passage would defuse moves to push for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, Clinton wrote.”

Now his lips are moving, but whatever the reason or actual effect I would say that the possibility of a national amendment is now remote. There might be some truth to it, but of course the biggest factor are the number of voters who accepted ‘gay marriage’ at the time. Doma was 96 I think, the first state amendments were in 98, Hawaai and Alaska. The first gay marriage state was Mass. in 2004.

Freegards


18 posted on 03/08/2013 7:39:29 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why should the high Court listen to an impeached perjeror who lost his law license in his own state?


19 posted on 03/08/2013 9:27:19 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That’s presuming no bias on the part of said Court.


20 posted on 03/08/2013 9:42:59 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson