Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals fret over Obama-GOP talks
The Hill ^ | 3/07/13 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 03/10/2013 3:20:54 AM PDT by Libloather

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and other liberals in Congress are ratcheting up pressure on President Obama to back away from a proposal to curb the growth of Social Security benefits.

Sanders and other liberals are concerned Obama may strike a deficit-reduction deal with Republicans that would reduce Social Security benefits by adopting a less generous way of adjusting benefits for inflation.

Obama has previously said he would consider using a formula known as chain-Consumer Price Index that would lower the growth of entitlements by slowing benefit increases for inflation.

Sanders and other liberals are worried Obama will renew that offer in new deficit-reduction talks. Obama had dinner with 12 Senate Republicans Wednesday evening to discuss the path forward on a grand bargain to reduce the deficit, and senators in attendance said entitlements were discussed.

Sanders on Thursday introduced legislation co-sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to raise payroll taxes on the wealthy to extend the solvency of Social Security.

Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), Al Franken (Minn.) and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) have co-sponsored the bill as well.

The bill would apply the Social Security payroll tax to all income over $250,000 a year, which Sanders said would ensure Social Security can pay out benefits over the next 50 years.

A senior Democratic aide said Wednesday the outlines of a deal are apparent.

“Social Security is facing an unprecedented attack from those who either want to privatize it completely or who want to make substantial cuts,” said Sanders at a press conference. “The argument being used to cut Social Security is that because we have a significant deficit problem and a $16.6 trillion national debt, we just can’t afford to maintain Social Security benefits.

“This argument is false. Social Security, because it is funded by the payroll tax, not the U.S. Treasury, has not contributed one nickel to our deficit,” he said.

Sanders estimates switching to a chained-CPI formula for determining benefits for Social Security would result in the average 65 year old living on about $15,000 a year receiving $650 less each year when they turn 75 and $1,000 less a year when they turn 85.

Sanders put pressure on Obama not to depart from the promises he made during the 2008 presidential campaign, when he pledged to oppose reductions in benefits.

“The president’s specific campaign proposal was to apply Social Security payroll taxes to all income above $250,000. In other words, the proposal we are introducing today is exactly what the president campaigned on in 2008,” Sanders said.

Reid praised Sanders’s bill in a statement.

“His legislation should make people think twice before assuming that the only way to strengthen Social Security is to take away benefits that seniors have earned, or raise taxes on the middle class,” Reid said.

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) has introduced companion legislation in the House.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gop; leftists; liberals; talks
Socialists are worried. And why is that such a bad thing?
1 posted on 03/10/2013 3:20:54 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Not to worry breaking bread with friends is normal and thats what these republicans are ....friends. Ask yourself if you were invited would you go? nuff sed! charactor and conviction makes the man these snakes are despicable

2 posted on 03/10/2013 4:14:25 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Obama loves this. It makes him look like the rational moderate soaring above the fray.

3 posted on 03/10/2013 4:49:52 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The bill would apply the Social Security payroll tax to all income over $250,000 a year

Raises the marginal rate by 15%? They should keep raising it to an even 100 and get it over with. The county will die that much sooner so we can start over.

4 posted on 03/10/2013 5:54:08 AM PDT by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Not only do the liberals fret, so do the REAL conservatives. Anytime you rub elbows with a thief, watch your pocket book.

I am rather disappointed with my Senator Johnson (Wisconsin) who went to “The Dinnner” instead of standing with Paul.

5 posted on 03/10/2013 6:04:40 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: randita

“The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.” (Emerson, 1860)

6 posted on 03/10/2013 6:45:45 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Liberals fear that by compromising, Obama will concede the argument - that entitlements must be cut. Then the framing of the argument will not be "never cut entitlements" to "how much should be cut". This is what they fear.
7 posted on 03/10/2013 10:51:47 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Sometimes it takes calamity to lead to serenity - FReeper RacerX1128)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson