Posted on 03/11/2013 6:50:54 AM PDT by rellimpank
The key question is: HOW - exactly - is the 2nd Amendment ignored?
And here's the answer: By applying gun control to CORPORATE status - ONLY.
And then treating non-corporate people as corporations.
So, if we know the answer, why don't gun advocates use it?
Because that's the Scary Place.
Scorn if you want. But while you scorn, liberals laugh - and continue to pass their corporate laws and apply them to non-corporate citizens.
That is the truth.
...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ...
When elected officials and bureaucracies act outside the law they are simply lawbreakers. When the majority of the people vote in favor of total lawlessness in the highest offices they are withdrawing their consent to be governed by a constitutional government. By what legitimate basis does the United States of America, as a Constitutional republic, still exist?
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
'The People' no longer support that. They voted in support of lawlessness from the highest office on down. They voted against the rule of law. By referendum we now have a banana republic. The USAINO.
You just defined Democratic Politics.
So much for the “a gun behind every blade of grass” brags of the naivist class.
The enemy army is already IN America. And running the place.
Observation is correct.
Obama himself is ON RECORD...saying he doesn't think anyone should own guns. PERIOD.
This isn't news.......to me.
Although it's probably news to millions...of the uninformed.
Show me the error in my logic. Explain how I got my premises wrong.
Assure me that Americans still believe in America. :-(
Some do, the question is: are there enough?
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.” ~Franklin
That is the question and I think it can only be answered in the next presidential election. Or some great groundswell of outrage to oust these communist usurpers. Even if a majority of Americans oppose them in their hearts it will be meaningless if less than a majority stand up and demand redress.
Make a mental snapshot of the empty shelves where guns and ammo were.
Burn that memory into your brain.
Make photo’s and send them to your Congressman. Remind them that they did this.
And in the last two months... (Dec. 2012 and Jan. 2013)
Americans Buy Enough Guns in Last Two Months to Outfit the Entire Chinese and Indian Armies
I take solace in these facts. The FedMob may have billions of rounds of ammo on order but We The People have trillions of rounds in our possession.
found this pic today.
What do you think?
http://bogieecommerce.typepad.com/.a/6a0147e17d2ceb970b017ee8a69123970d-800wi
Ain’t that the truth though? Everyone sees what they want to see. Darned few want to see reality.
Reality?
That last frame reminds me of the statement:
“The most dangerous place in the world is between a mother and her child.”
You can take that one to the bank. I know many farm women/mothers who the last frame is representative and on top of that when the breech is closed, they can shoot.
No doubt about that! Shooting is something that women can do very well. Both from the technical standpoint to the will to drop the hammer on someone. It may take more to push a woman to that point but when she decides it’s time for you to take a dirt nap IMO she’ll be less likely to second guess that decision than a man. We need a Drill Sargent to beat that indecision bone out of our heads. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.