Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ryan’s Plan Deserves Kudos, Not Boos
Townhall.com ^ | March 14, 2013 | Bob Barr

Posted on 03/14/2013 5:20:48 AM PDT by Kaslin

Yesterday, Paul Ryan, Republican Chairman of the House Budget Committee, unveiled his plan that would balance the federal budget within one decade. Considering that the nation’s debt (not including the huge future cost of major entitlement programs) is now approaching $17 trillion, one might think political leaders in Washington, D.C. would consider such a proposal. On the Democratic side of the aisle, however, there is no interest whatsoever in taking such a constructive approach.

Democrats in both houses of the Congress and the Obama Administration, along with many media-based pundits, began to loudly criticize the Ryan proposal even before it was presented. They whine that it is soft on some details and that it -- Heaven forbid -- focuses on spending cuts as the preferred way tobalance the budget rather than revenue enhancements (also known as “tax increases”).

Instead of wailing and gnashing of fiscal teeth, Congress and the President ought to be heaving a sigh of relief and heaping kudos on the former vice-presidential nominee, for doing what they collectively and separately have failed to accomplish. The young Congressman from Wisconsin actually put together a thoughtful, substantive and comprehensive budget. But, of course, Washington does not operate with the same logical, problem-solving approach as a business; according to which a proposal would be viewed as a starting point from which to construct a final solution.

In the deeply partisan environment prevailing today in our nation’s capital, a real plan such as Ryan’s is savaged by the other party for every manner of reason; with no effort to, or interest in, working toward an ultimate solution.

Opponents howl that Ryan’s plan slashes government spending so deeply it would -- if enacted -- essentially doom America to a lengthy and massive depression. Yet, if viewed for what it actually is -- a budget providing for a rate of increase in federal spending at a historically healthy 3.4 percent -- the plan envisions robust federal outlays more than sufficient to avoid economic calamity. Indeed, rather than a miserly budget plan causing America’s children to languish in bread lines, Ryan’s budget proposes federal spending of $41 trillion over the next decade -- hardly a draconian approach to budgeting.

Fundamentally, Ryan’s budget recognizes the reality President Obama and his Democratic colleagues in the Congress absolutely refuse to acknowledge: We do have a spending problem. It then proposes what is to the Democrats, unthinkable: reducing spending rather than increasing taxes. The Democrats’ blind and absolute adherence to a philosophy of addressing the budget deficit by seeking ways to increase revenues (“taxes”) thus leads Obama’s Party to refuse to even consider Ryan’s proposal as a collection of ideas from which to negotiate; to them, it is seen as nothing more than an infected bed sheet during the Black Plague -- something to be burned and buried.

Some among the chattering class have been quick to reject the Ryan proposal because it does not address in detail every aspect of the federal budget morass that has given us $1.0 trillion-plus deficits every year in which this president has been in office. Of course, had Ryan’s initial plan, as unveiled yesterday, included every detail of an overhaul of our current income tax and entitlement systems -- systems Rube Goldberg would be proud to claim as his own -- the congressman’s detractors would have scoffed that the plan was “too complex” to work.

Central, of course, to the Democrats’ knee-jerk rejection of the Ryan plan is that it contemplates and incorporates an approach to healthcare reform fully at odds with the sacred cow that is “ObamaCare.” This alone dooms the plan to the graveyard into which that political party throws any proposal founded on the notion of individual choice rather than government mandate.

Hopefully, Republicans in the Congress -- including the leadership -- will run with the Ryan Plan. It is worthy of adoption not because every member and every faction within the GOP agrees with its every element; rather, the plan should be employed as a visible and strong framework with which to construct for the American people a workable, balanced federal budget within a realistic timeframe that also incorporates vital reforms of the myriad government programs that have been permitted to grow uncontrollably and led us to the brink of fiscal collapse.

Paul Ryan has teed up a worthy proposal; let’s now see if the GOP hits it down the fairway or whiffs it.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barackobama; boos; budgetandgovernment; federalspending; paulryan; ryanbudget; senatedemocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: sickoflibs

” Given that this like the other versions is DOA anyway why doesnt Ryan come up with a real proposal that changes Medicare starting now, or say 2014, instead of his silly ‘wait 11 year’ gimmick that fools no one?? “

Meet the new Ryan deferment....same as the old Ryan deferment.


21 posted on 03/14/2013 10:29:14 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; NFHale
RE :”Meet the new Ryan deferment....same as the old Ryan deferment.”

If I read between the lines I think that this is not about winning the issue, nor is it about winning elections, its about having a lame comeback line that few will buy after more years of Dems winning and the country sinks further in debt.
I am thinking that Ryan has decided to run too, God help us. Imagine the back-tracking he would do if he won the primary.

“If you only listened to Paul Ryan we would ......bla-bla-bla”

“Bush was a huge success, Bawny Fwank blew up the nations economy single handedly. And Greece's too”

File them in the lock-box of lame excuses.

22 posted on 03/14/2013 8:37:51 PM PDT by sickoflibs (O's sequester Apocalypse tour just proved why we need the 2nd amendment more than ever NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Gilbo_3; NFHale

” If I read between the lines I think that this is not about winning the issue, nor is it about winning elections, its about having a lame comeback line that few will buy after more years of Dems winning and the country sinks further in debt. “

You read it correctly. Ryan is just like most so-called conservative pols...lay low, and get elected to something. IMHO, he is useless.


23 posted on 03/15/2013 11:00:01 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; NFHale
RE :”You read it correctly. Ryan is just like most so-called conservative pols...lay low, and get elected to something. IMHO, he is useless.”

Well the term 'conservative' is used very loosely around here for sure.

Ryan does whatever his masters tell him to, GWB before, Bohner now..

In 2004 he votes to blow up Medicares costs with that Bush freebee expansion. After years of running that new debt up he decides Medicare ‘is going broke’ and to save it: 1) he promises those within 10 years of 65 that they will still get to join the gravy train and stay on till death(you won the lottery Pops) , 2) but sorry, one day younger than that and he has to save it for you by replacing it with a few lines of standard Ryan Rhetoric. (they can hand a Ryan IOU to the doctor in 11 years after they retire.)

Like Gilb, I have no faith that Ryan has any ideas that will work, but when he proposes stuff to take effect in 10 years it tells me that even he doesnt believe his own BS>

24 posted on 03/15/2013 11:12:32 AM PDT by sickoflibs (O's sequester Apocalypse tour just proved why we need the 2nd amendment more than ever NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Gilbo_3; NFHale

” Ryan does whatever his masters tell him to, GWB before, Bohner now..”

And we used to ridicule Clinton for his “need to maintain my political viability”. Now all seem to have are “lifer” Republican politicians who are quite content to be ruled by Democrats . Boehner is the classic example. Ryan’s plan solves nothing, while he plays it safe for a few more years.


25 posted on 03/15/2013 11:48:28 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson