Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Letís get marriage out of the tax code
Hotair ^ | 03/14/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 03/14/2013 7:41:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-178 next last
To: SeekAndFind
One of the underlying aspects to the Gay Marriage agenda besides pedophilia is depopulation.
This is why the leftists who read the population bomb as scripture are so willing to throw
out the Bible and all reasoning with mankind, and our dominance of the planet God gave us.

Every small gain to them is a win.

101 posted on 03/14/2013 4:07:37 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

who decides about hwo get the kdis how about divorce how about who gets the dog and house then.

Homosexuals want their sham marriage to destroy the traditional family, one has to be ignorant or dumb to not know that today.

hell we have the rules for communism in 1963.
we have them using Alinsky tactics who oppose them.

then we have ex KGB saying how they want to destory America]]

just head on the radio that the military has seen a massive increase of sexual assaults/rapes on men by men last year and I guarantee that is no coincidence that don;t ask was done away with.
Also heard that this admin has spent one and a half million on a study about homosexual women not being fat.

The sooner our side speaks up about this issue the sooner our children will have a better future and the sooner we will stop this insane madness.

someone posted this earlier about drugs but I think it also applies to the homosexual agenda and the Communist rules of 1963.

When one reads the 63 rules, then the Alinsky rules and the Cloward and Poiven and then hear what this guy said and then see how the left are using the homosexual agenda to destroy the family then one has to be the dumbest most stupid fool to not think something is going on all these decades and yes it;s not the usual of I know someone and they;re nice and they love each other crap

...to be Useful Idiot paving stones upon the road to demoralization:

“According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.

It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.

The first stage being “demoralization”. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism.

Most of the activity of the department [KGB] was to compile huge amount / volume of information, on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion. Publisher, editors, journalists, uh actors, educationalists, professors of political science. Members of parliament, representatives of business circles.

Most of these people were divided roughly into two groups: those who would tow the Soviet foreign policy, they would be promoted to positions of power through media and public manipulation; [and] those who refuse the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated OR executed physically, come Revolution. “

—KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov

—Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (Ideological subversion, Destabilization, CRISIS - and the KGB)

One who doe snot understand the steps in their agenda today are either stupid, ignorant or just couldn;t careless or does want the family and American destroyed


102 posted on 03/14/2013 4:51:06 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

and who decides on who gets what , you know little things like the kids then.

Time for people to wake the hell up about marriage and what the homosexuals and the radical left really want and it;s not just marriage and using the usual crap of Govt out of it is just a pointless stupid argument with a left wing kook or an idiot


103 posted on 03/14/2013 4:52:58 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

hope he;s not turing into his nut case dad and giving the left presents.

I hate it when these so called lefty arguments are used to back left wing agendas and then they call themselves conservatives, they are not they;re libertarians who want drugs legal, any kind of marriage nad live a life of anarchy and od what ever they want

roblem si that someone has to decide on wo gets what when the marriage has failed and that is Govt and the church is hardly going to do that are they, so that liberal communist argument of Govt out of it is pathetic IMHO


104 posted on 03/14/2013 4:55:36 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

starting to think Paul is a libetarian and not a conservative but yet again we have another libertarian who wants to fly on the republican ticket because they can;t get anywhere in the libertarian ticket and then they expect us to change our views to suit their anarchy


105 posted on 03/14/2013 4:58:01 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

then who decies on the divorce issues, who gets the kids

quite nice saying Govt get ut but when you think about things then it doens;t really work like that

hell even with the founders they had meetings and the leaders of that community the local Govt settled things


106 posted on 03/14/2013 4:59:43 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

LOL, yea people get married and think they will stay all their lives wiht each other but the problem is that they have kids and then want a divorce and that is when the govt steps in.

Govt out of marriage is a cop out for the simple or not thought about it folk.

I;m sick of hearing that homosexuals should marry and then it;s cousins, then get rid of age limits

Govt out of it is a cop out which sounds good but not in reality


107 posted on 03/14/2013 5:04:30 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

if he;s turing into his father and giving presents tot he homosexuals and the radical left then he;s lost me and he needs to be put on the libertarian ticket not a republcian one and that goes for all the libertarians who pretend they;re conservative


108 posted on 03/14/2013 5:06:20 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: manc
then who decies on the divorce issues, who gets the kids quite nice saying Govt get ut but when you think about things then it doens;t really work like that

What the heck are you talking about? Unmarried couples who split up bring these things to the government all the time. Except when they don't and can figure it out themselves. And if the government isn't by default involved that would mean divorcing married couples who can agree on separation without the involvement of a judge can do it themselves. Just like some of the unmarried breakups do today.

I have to say after reading everyone's reasons for why the government should stay in the marriage business, I'm more convinced than ever they should get the heck out. Immigration is not a compelling reason. Social security will be a mess, but it's going to be a mess anyway.

109 posted on 03/14/2013 5:07:38 PM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

put divorce in the clergy, er what about two people from different religions?

Ok then do you seriously think after having kids that I woudl listen to a guy years later who never married me because he;s now dead and he;s telling me to not see my kids.

yea right, dream on, that is what anarchy is about, so if there is o law protecting this then it;s one for all and a lots of bad temper\\

I wish people would wake the hell up and stop repeating what sounds good


110 posted on 03/14/2013 5:08:29 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

again who is to decide who gets my kids, my house, my money?

I;ve heard one libertarian sttae how the clergy should decide,

Like I;mgoing to listen to the clergy guy who never married me and what about two people like my wife and I who married and did nto marry in a church because of different religions?

Fact is Govt is in involved and they decide who gets what and if the courts told me after divorce I had to do something then I do it so I do not break the law but if some one who tells me to do something with my kids after my divorce and they have no legal standing ten they can take a flying leap off a bridge


111 posted on 03/14/2013 5:12:55 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Alex, things that morally ambivalent idiot libertarians believe for $1000.


112 posted on 03/14/2013 5:14:10 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

do you have any idea how many ex married couples can not agree on who gets the kids and house or dog?

Living in a dream anarchy world if one thinks people will just agree on who gets their kids in a divorce and those people need to wake the hell up and stop pretending to be republican and admit they;re libertarian or liberal which is not far off from each other ,, infact the same on social issues


113 posted on 03/14/2013 5:15:10 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

just reading all these comments and the couple of posters who think Govt should stay out of it use the same argument as liberals/libertarian which are the same on social issues anyway.

they live in some fantasy dream world where they think people will just leave each other, agree on the kids, who gets the house, and then I read off one poster who said that the clergy shold decide,

LOL Yea OK but what about two people from different religions, do we have a sit down with a rabbi and a Christian, yea that isn;t going to work

Wish these people would wake the hell up, maybe the impressionable idiots might one day who knows but in the meantime the radical left are loving what Paul is saying and maybe Rand is going the same way as his father/

Why can;t libertarians just admit they;re not republicans, they;re not conservatives, \Use their own party , and primary


114 posted on 03/14/2013 5:19:50 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Well maybe Rand Paul is going against the old man, who came out for sodomite marriage during the debates, and also voted to lift DADT and codify sodomy in the US Armed Forces.


115 posted on 03/14/2013 5:42:06 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: manc
they live in some fantasy dream world where they think people will just leave each other, agree on the kids, who gets the house, and then I read off one poster who said that the clergy shold decide

Libertarians have something in common with extreme leftists -they hold a delusional belief in some utopian vision of what could be but is not and never has been. Social disorder and anarchy are just as much enemies of liberty as tyranny is...

116 posted on 03/14/2013 5:45:10 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

agree, they are no better than the occupy smelly lot hwo want no Govt and do what ever they want and to hell with everyone and the country.


117 posted on 03/14/2013 5:48:32 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: manc

Pope Francis has said same-sex marriage is the work of the devil and a “destructive attack on God’s plan.” He has also said that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children.

God bless this Holy Man an may be keep speaking the true
word of God.


118 posted on 03/14/2013 5:50:08 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

totally totally agree with him and you/

I was in foster care going home to home and there is no way I wanted two men to take me in their house and let me see them living with each other or kissing or being taken to those freak parades.

I love this Pope and I;m not a catholic


119 posted on 03/14/2013 5:57:25 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: manc

yep


120 posted on 03/14/2013 6:43:10 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Telling the truth about RINOS, PAULTARDS, Liberals and Muslims has become hate speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson