Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
“I’m an old-fashioned traditionalist. I believe in the historic and religious definition of marriage,” he says. “That being said, I’m not for eliminating contracts between adults. I think there are ways to make the tax code more neutral, so it doesn’t mention marriage. Then we don’t have to redefine what marriage is; we just don’t have marriage in the tax code.”

Amen!!!

9 posted on 03/14/2013 8:19:08 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExCTCitizen; Poison Pill

Replies 8 and 9.

You both make good arguments. Get the government out of marriage.

The queers won’t like it because it takes away one of their most powerful pulpits, but I don’t care. The government is spending way too much time and our tax dollars on something that fundamentally is none of their business.

Tired but true: you can’t legislate morality.


141 posted on 03/16/2013 6:27:19 AM PDT by upchuck (Free Republic: faster than a speeding bullet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson