Skip to comments.Mark Kelly's 'AR-15 Stunt' Provokes Giffords Photo Leak
Posted on 03/14/2013 2:58:08 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron
Mark Kelly's campaign against "assault weapons" such as the AR-15 rifle has sparked a local backlash. On March 13, a Tucson, Arizona radio host published a photograph of former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords holding an AR-15 rifle at a gun range. Giffords has since confirmed that the photograph is authentic.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Just an FYI pong!
‘Do as we say not as do’ elitist scumbags and treason monkeys.
Those two amigos better start apologizing to Palin, the NRA and every law-abiding gun owner in the US.
did she shoot bullet holes into a pic of a white kid?
Gosh, just the look of sheer disgust on her face, it makes me want to support the gun banners.
Her hubby is having trouble making a purchase ~ he’s used several excuses. In the end everybody knows this is leading to divorce.
Yup...what part of So. Cal you in?
I was born and raised for 40 years in So. Cal, been in Vegas for about 13 years now.
Btw , is Giffords able to even write sentences like the paragraph in Breitbart’s story from her Facebook page.
L.A. (the Valley)
She almost shot his ear off! Incidentally, ar15’s had nothing to do with her shooting, so why go after them? They’re like those people who call for handgun bans after incidents involving rifles.
Is she mentally impaired? Does she have PTS? She can’t have a weapon. She is a danger to society.
Guns for me, but not for Thee.
Some one will PS Loughner's face in that pic, that would drive a good point home.
No. It’s all a scam. They audio-tape words together to make it sound like she’s speaking (speeches) too.
Because it about ALL guns and our wealth. They want everything.
She had her therapist write the one she read before Congress.
Wait a minute.... considering her traumatic brain damage and the potential of associated PTSD, should it even be legal for her to possess a firearm??
Same here, went to No Hollywood High...been around and lived in, well, just about every where there.
Great find as always RummyChick!
Yeah, that is real smart. Give someone with brain damage a gun.
You Democrats are geniuses.
Maybe it was a special *request*. The benefits of following, er, the request well outweighed integrity.
Probably for the same reason it HAD to be an "assault" rifle in the Newtown shooting and not the handguns as originally reported.
Weren’t these photos taken BEFORE she was shot?
Hey you little people go away and shut up!
Weapons are for the elite! We need protection there is no violence against you serfs just us Bright Stars on the Great Horizon! No go back to your little lives and leave important things to those who really know what is good for you poor peasants!
Note the standard 30 round magazine in the AR15, and the standard 50 rounder in the AK.
I hadn't heard about that but it doesn't surprise me in the least.
Sequoyah101 had a good point, one that I was was thinking of just the other day vis a vie the story of the women's husband had his guns confiscated in California the other day.
I can't find the link right now as my ping page seems to be limited.
I agree. The Gifford family have both lived off the Gov. and; they are the biggest two hypocrites I have heard in this gun grab sham.
The dummy got shot by being a damn idiot to begin with as she help an open town hall type meeting without a single policeman/LEO of any kind or armed private security.
Oh! If they WERE taken before she was shot, then that is cool...my misunderstanding.
My only problem with it is having a mag inserted
and the bolt forward, we don’t know whether it’s
loaded or not...needed a chamber flag.
Until this shooting, having a security detail was not SOP for most of these meetings.
No, the real crime here was the kook being allowed to escape the NICS list because the corrupt Dem Sheriff of Pima County covered for him after a few “incidents.” The kook’s Mommy was a manager of a County park and a pal of the Sheriff.
Oh, and that smile?
That’s normal after shooting, the only time there are
frowns are when there are malfunctions or maggies drawers.
You should have heard the “speeches” she made, even before her big tv interview. Unless she wasn’t actually as injured as it was claimed, there is no way she was talking like that.
The campaign wanted to keep her image going to keep their jobs and hold out for her cushy retirement. They continually posted things on FB and Twitter, pretending those words were coming from Gabby, and pretending she was actually “working.” (You can even look at the original Breitbart story to see more fake writing from her.)
Even the tv interview was highly prompted, monitored, censored, and rehearsed. Plus, even though she rammed her constituents into DeathCare, saying she knew better than the vast majority of us, she received only the world’s finest healthcare, and every kind of therapy only the nobility receives. If only our veterans with brain damage got a fraction of the speech therapy she did.
The whole thing has been one big Hollywood production. Back when the incident happened, the husband released some really ghoulish photos within the first couple of weeks — one of her dead-looking hand, and some others of a white sheet. The entire time, the newspaper and everyone else acted like she was about to bounce right up and go back to work.
Second picture - No hearing protection? No eye protection?
No wonder they are posed in front of a non-traditional target. Well there is that weird goatee thing, and he could be about 20... perhaps Ferris Bueller became a gangbanger, so maybe it's okay then... :-/
Can I get some range time with THAT guy, please?
Nice...going on my Facebook page as I type.
Guns for me but not for thee!
Relax, it is just a white kid.
2010 I think.
“...in front of a non-traditional target.”
Too bad it wasn’t one of those targets of a pregnant mom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.