Posted on 03/15/2013 5:05:26 AM PDT by Anila
Kiki Gray would never point a gun at a cop, said his family and friends.
He was a “good boy.” Kiki would never even carry a gun.
But if he did point it at two plain clothes cops in Brooklyn last Saturday night, Kiki would not have shot them.
After all, Kiki was only 16 years old and he was a “some mother’s son.”
The videos show a different picture of Kiki. A violent, lawless Kiki that perhaps his family and friends did not know.
More on that in a minute. First the killing, then the riot that followed Kiki’s death.
Friends say Kiki had just returned from a baby shower and was hanging out in front of a friend’s house last Saturday night.
The officers were members of a Brooklyn anti-crime task force. Kiki had a record of at least four arrests for inciting a riot, larceny, and grand theft auto.
When cops tried to question Kiki, he ran. While they were chasing him, Kiki pulled a .38 caliber hand gun out of his belt, say police.
Not true, said a story racing through the neighborhood soon after. Some heard Kiki begging for mercy, telling the police not to shoot him any more. “Stay down, or we’ll shoot you again,” said one of the officers, according to the New York Times. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/tv-smashing-rock-hurling-candlelight-vigil/#yh2zCKbJIXUkBVpu.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Bravo, that's a very reasoned and logical statement.
And I'm guessing that the white liberals at the universities, MSM, etc. don't even realize what they have done. They have destroyed the black middle class.
But I suspect that the white liberal politicians do know what they have done. But they don't care. In fact, it is to their advantage to have no black middle class. The poor will always vote for the party that promises them the most.
He was a good boy...”
He turned out to be a better target.
And the "poor" seem incapable of realizing that they have to be kept that way to preserve their voting habits.
Truthfully? No.
Plantation owners had skin in the game. They shelled out hard coin for slaves, and wanted to get a return on their investment--after all it was their money.
For most, that meant at least a modicum of housing, health care, food, and adequate clothing for the climate, otherwise their slaves couldn't work. Some even went so far as to provide (sometimes against the law) enough education for their servants to be better workers.
The difference?
Liberals don't have a dime of their money invested
They don't care about so much as getting a day's work out of those on their "plantation"
so the results of their actions only matter when the Liberals want to make more rules for everyone else, or spend more of everyone else's money furthering the problems they created.
They don't even care enough about the welfare of the people they trap to be bothered about the wreckage they create, except to use the statistics to try and create more. The people they manipulate are only lab rats in a great sociology experiment to the liberals, and valued about as much.
No plantation owner of old would have tolerated such crap, but liberals encourage it because when the day is done the only profit liberals need comes from your pocket, not from the people they would rule being productive.
Where’s everyone’s “cultural tolerance”?
This IS the way the people of this culture hold a “vigil”!
Inner cities are the plantations now. The blacks who live there, while not expected or required to work, are expected to vote enmasse for liberals. It is their only purpose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.