Skip to comments.Addicted Obamacrats Hooked On Taxes
Posted on 03/15/2013 9:47:08 AM PDT by Kaslin
WASHINGTON - President Obama and the Democrats still don't get it. They laid down their budget markers this week, seeking to impose nearly $1 trillion in new taxes on an economy that's still struggling to get back on its feet.
Squeezing even more money out of a weak economy whose growth was virtually zero in the last three months of 2012 -- and that forecasters say will grow by no more than 1 to 2 percent this year, is the height of irresponsibility.
In his meetings this week with Republicans on Capitol Hill, Obama once again outlined the same tax demands he made in December for at least three quarters of a trillion dollars to, in part, replace the spending cuts forced by last month's sequester law.
Senate Democrats want even more money taken out of the economy, about $1 trillion in "new taxes" over the next 10 years. Their plan, unveiled Wednesday, would add $5.2 trillion to the federal deficit over the coming decade
House Republicans have proposed $4.6 trillion in future budget savings by repealing Obamacare and reforming entitlements, producing a budget surplus by 2023.
But the heart of the GOP's budget plan is an overhaul of a dysfunctional, wasteful, anti-growth tax code to scrub hundreds of special interest exemptions, deductions and other costly loopholes from its revenue provisions -- from billions in corporate welfare to narrowly drawn giveaways to Hollywood movie-makers.
That would yield large amounts in new revenues to, in part, offset reductions in the 35 percent corporate tax rate -- the highest in the industrialized world -- and other tax cut incentives to spur job-creating capital investment and stronger economic growth.
Republican leaders say this must be part and parcel of any budget reforms. The White House and Democrats in the Senate want the higher tax revenues first and then the budget cuts. Sure. We've been down that road many times before, only to see spending and debt soar into an ever higher orbit.
Four years ago, the government was spending over $3 trillion. Four years from now, Obama will leave office with annual expenditures of nearly $4 trillion.
I know I've sounded like a broken record on this issue, but boosting higher economic growth, in addition to cutting spending, is the critical element that's been missing from this budget debate. It gets scant attention from either side of the aisle.
"[G]iven the low probability that Congress will make deep cuts in spending, it's only through stronger economic growth and more tax revenues that the government is likely to make significant inroads in the $1 trillion budget deficit," writes economic analyst Diana Furchtgott-Roth, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
But Obama rarely talks about economic growth. It's not in his political vocabulary or in his economic policies which have failed to reduce unemployment rates to more normal levels. His relentless, political mantra is to raise taxes to pay for his liberal vision of a larger and more costly cradle-to-grave welfare state.
He sold his flim-flam ideas to enough voters in just a handful of swing states by appealing to America's sense of tax fairness, falsely charging that wealthy Americans were not paying their fair share. In fact, the top 20 percent of all income earners pay almost all of the income taxes.
And Capitol Hill Democrats, as they have for decades, seem determined to snuff out what little growth is left in the economy with even higher tax rates than we have now.
Haven't we learned enough painful lessons from past tax increases that when you when you raise taxes on just about anything, it will ultimately bring in less revenue?
Remember the 10 percent tax Democrats slapped on all boats above $100,000 in 1991? Then-Senate Democratic Leader George Mitchell and Sen. Ted Kennedy, just like Obama, gleefully declared that rich yacht owners would finally be forced to pay their fair share. The higher tax was also levied on expensive cars, furs and private planes.
But it turned out that people bought a lot less of these luxury items and the higher tax rates brought in far less revenue than was projected. Boat industries in Mitchell's home state of Maine, and in Kennedy's Massachusetts, were hit hard. Sales fell by 77 percent and boat builders laid off 25,000 workers.
It wasn't long before the Democrat tax-hikers heard from angry, unemployed boat builders who weren't wealthy and the taxes were repealed a few years later.
But the Obama Democrats are hooked on their need for even more taxes to feed their growing addiction to ever higher spending. Earlier this year, with strong Democratic support, Congress approved higher income and capital gains taxes on Americans with incomes over $400,000.
But the record shows that whenever capital gains taxes are raised, it brings in less revenue, not more, as investors tend to hold on to stocks and their other assets in order to avoid the larger tax bite. When the rate is cut, they tend to take advantage of the reduction and sell, boosting capital gains tax revenues.
When President Clinton signed a GOP-passed capital gains tax cut in 1997, lowering the tax from 28 percent to 20 percent, revenues grew by 18 percent.
"One of the worst things you can tax is capital formation, says Will McBride, chief economist at the non-partisan Tax Foundation."When you increase the capital gains rate, you increase the tax on using equities to finance investing."
Raising taxes takes money out of the economy which in turn means slower economic growth that results in higher deficits and more debt.
Obama and the Democrats are still selling their snake oil tax remedies, but there are signs that the president is losing the public's trust on the economy, a Washington Post poll reported this week.
He held a large 18-percentage point advantage over congressional Republicans on who Americans trusted more to handle with the economy. Now, it's a nearly even split -- 44 percent for the president and 40 percent for the GOP.
The debate over the budget is in its early stages, but the battle lines are tightly drawn on taxes. Obama has got all the new tax revenue he's going to get, say House GOP leaders. Any new revenue must come from tax reform that lowers tax rates to spur stronger economic growth.
This is all part of the corruptocrats plan to destroy the economy and make nearly everyone dependent on them for their existence. Of course, if no one works, no one pays taxe but they don’t understand that concept.
But the Obama Democrats are hooked on their need for even more taxes to feed their growing addiction.
If the reps take the senate the dems will have to take the cure for their ADDICTION of taxing and spending.
Look Obama is an economic moron surrounded by morons and committed Marxists. The problem is there is a working majority of Americans that are economic morons or committed Marxists.
The first thing we have to do is stop calling Obama stupid,he is not,he is doing exactly what he said he was going to do. Fight him on his STATED intention to totally transform the United States Of America,we may think it is at a minimum stupid,but it has always been his goal because of his warped mind and the chip he has on his shoulder about this country.
If we just keep calling him stupid and not pointing out that his policies are intentionally destroying the economy so he can install his idea of a Marxist utopia,we are going to have his agenda implemented and then carried on by the star pupil of Saul Alinsky ,Hillary Clinton.
He is not stupid,point out what he is doing is intentional,you are going to lose all your freedoms,ALL of them if the Marxist is allowed to continue on implementing his tax and spend policies,and then hand them over to the next substitute Hillary. If the public is not informed about where these ideas come from and why he is doing it we are doomed.
No argument here about the morons on the march.
Being a moron and a committed Marxist are not mutually exclusive. Obama is a lightweight intellectually with little to no life experiences that would help him understand economies. So you may go through life thinking that Obama is an evil genius with a plan. I know better. He has a plan drawn up by some smart committed Marxists but Obama just is not that bright.