Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Ships 12-Miles Offshore to Provide Floating City for Entrepreneurial Start-Ups;
Townhall.com ^ | March 16, 2013 | Mike Shedlock

Posted on 03/16/2013 9:40:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Kaslin

Wow, this is an excellent idea! Unfortunately, you KNOW the whore Democrat politicians are going to come up with a way to extort taxes, graft, bribes, “campaign loot”, etc. from these “start-ups” no matter how far out at sea they go.


21 posted on 03/16/2013 10:18:43 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I get the feeling these folks will not be allowing any illegal aliens to sneak on board and laws will be enforced.


22 posted on 03/16/2013 10:22:19 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Blueseed’s major stumbling block is the California Coastal Commission, which so far as I can tell, they haven't even begun bribing, err, I mean, speaking with. Also Blueseed appears to have yet purchased a single keel - no ferry, no platform, which really means, no project.

In digging through various forums, it appears they've started the process of examining options for mooring and microwave internet links, but it's at the stage which an individual might make inquiries, not a company seeking and implementing solutions for a project that is supposed to be in the water in a year.

The 12 NM limit will evade a whole lot of US paperwork and regulation, but it is still within the 200 NM limit of regulation regarding the environment, which means full authority of the Coastal Commission and US environmental, health and safety regulations. Beyond, in making a stationary structure (which is what a permanently moored ship would be under international law), at any moment the US government has full authority to nationalize the structure.

As for their future? The only way I see them meeting their goal of 1Q 2014 startup is through the immediate purchase of keels, an immediate start to the bribery, err, negotiations with the California Coastal Commission, and the purchase of an existing ferry company. Simply purchasing craft to act as ferries would be a foolish act, as obtaining permission to act as a large capacity commercial ferry in California is a nightmare. Only through the purchase of an existing company could they sidestep the two plus year obstacle course.

How to check up on Blueseed’s real progress? Simply watch the agenda of the California Coastal Commission. They'll need permission for an ocean going commercial ferry service, a generation permit for their power plants, submit and get approved their waste water plan, permission for installation of a permanent mooring station (like the commission just refused the US Navy), and permission for stationing a permanent structure in California coastal waters.

This for a commission which has constantly refused to approve any living accommodation offshore, conversion of cargo ships and cruise ships into apartment rentals, or the installation of virtually any permanent structure. Without extensive bribery, err, conversations on the topic, I don't see Blueseed ever getting into the water.

23 posted on 03/16/2013 10:24:48 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Wait until the toilets start backing up.


24 posted on 03/16/2013 10:30:39 AM PDT by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I don’t think it will fly off the California coast for the reasons you point out. It may be more legally possible off the coast of another state, such as North Carolina... but then they would have hurricanes.


25 posted on 03/16/2013 10:32:07 AM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

While 12 miles offshore is in international waters they are 188 miles inside of the exclusive economic zone. The US would require them to pay all taxes and follow all regulations so what is the point?


26 posted on 03/16/2013 10:33:13 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I expect a near constant harrassment of the ship by the DEA, Coast Guard, DHS, EPA and a thousand other biting flies from the government looking deep into the laws, regulations and handwritten post-it notes.

And just imagine if they start doing surgery on it to avoid Obamacare.

27 posted on 03/16/2013 10:36:22 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Earl Warren gained his fame by cracking down on gambling cruisers in the late 1930’s, which were situated just offshore of California for the same reasons proposed for this ship.


28 posted on 03/16/2013 10:47:58 AM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well...I used to work on ships for months at a time. That graphic they show, for some unknown reason /s, shows the ship lying in flat, calm waters of a bay or nice little harbor. ‘Moored’ would not describe it well - perhaps ‘floored’ by rollers (big rolling pin type waves) out there. Oil platforms are far more stable. I hope ‘investors’ know what they are getting into. Have them try living on a ship ‘moored’ 12 miles out...


29 posted on 03/16/2013 10:49:40 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

You couldn’t get me on a Carnival cruise ship


30 posted on 03/16/2013 10:56:33 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Don’t rule out subtle hints from dear leader(s) that at least one attack sub will be constantly around unless tribute is paid and if not ships will sink.


31 posted on 03/16/2013 11:06:54 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Actually, I don’t think you get it. This is a floating office building that rents space outside of the US. The owner of the boat doesn’t own any of the businesses therein.


32 posted on 03/16/2013 11:37:36 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert
Dat's a nice boat ya got dere.

Be a shame if sump'n was to happ'n to it...

33 posted on 03/16/2013 11:40:04 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Who protects them from pirates?


34 posted on 03/16/2013 11:41:59 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Gotta love how all those 20-somethings think that in the future, everyone will just sit in their underwear, push a few buttons on their computers, and get rich. You see this happen all the time on TV, when the reality of this is closer to the chances of becoming an NBA star.

This is the economic equivalent of everyone taking in everyone else’s laundry.

I really, really do like the idea of a floating, cut-rate hospital outside US waters, though. I’d invest in that!


35 posted on 03/16/2013 11:43:22 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Folks, if you think this is good, you’ve not thought the whole thing through (putting it kindly).....

That’s true. My question is, “Do they plan on becoming a citizen of that ship?” If they don’t want to support the U.S. with there time, physical presence, and tax dollars, they may as well be a citizen of someplace else. I’m not saying that I like taxes. I don’t. But this is kind of like the hippies that went to Canada back Vietnam war days because they didn’t want to be drafted. Who protects them from harm. About next the UN will decide they are the governing body of that area.


36 posted on 03/16/2013 11:45:25 AM PDT by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
It would make far more sense to set up a land-based startup incubator in another part of the world - perhaps Asia - and convince American talent to move there with tax and legal residency incentives. Imagine how much success (and fun) China could have by offering high-skilled Americans tax-free employment and legal residency with no reporting of income to the IRS and no IRS enforcement of any kind permitted against American expats.

The premise behind Blueseed is "America is so great, everybody wants to come here to work!" I'm not sure that holds any more.

37 posted on 03/16/2013 11:45:31 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
The US won’t be able to control them or tax them.

Sure they will. All the U.S. has to do is declare unilaterally that the territorial waters of the United States of America extends 200 miles.

Or, the U.S. could simply torpedo the ships as a barrier to safe navigation.

Would Obama do this?
Snicker, giggle, giggle, snort

38 posted on 03/16/2013 11:50:34 AM PDT by righttackle44 (Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Ok, I’ll go real slow for you. The boat is 12 miles from Silicon Valley. Obviously that’s to allow management employees that live in that area to “commute” to the boat.

Yes, it’s “legal”.

A funny thing happened in the IT business over the last 20 years, it’s called outsourcing.

A funny think happened in my father’s business, manufacturing, called outsourcing.

So we have generations of people getting ripped off by big business. And being small business people, neither my father nor I was able to successfully out-lobby big business, so the laws and regulations that create the big-business-favorable situation, while opposed by many, ultimately passed. In the name of “free markets”.

But I don’t want to have a business where I hire a hundred programmers in a third-world country and I sell my software here in America. I will only hire Americans for software I sell in America. There is no reason why Americans can’t write the software that they use; there is no reason why Americans can’t make EVERYTHING they use. NONE.

The reason they don’t is because it is dictated from the top of the supply chain, i.e., the largest firms - GE, the auto companies, etc. They are MONOPOLIES. Smaller firms that sell to them have virtually no other customers.

I have worked for big business, as my father did. They are not “pro-American”. They are pro-themselves, even if they run America into the ground.


39 posted on 03/16/2013 11:55:08 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

“Owning the ship, or hiring the contractors (cheaply) makes you the owner of an enterprise that is neatly evading the US legal framework by sitting 12 miles offshore.”

Somebody better be prepared to lay a giant bribe at the feet of the leading Democrat politicians else there’s going to be one heckuva Coast Guard inspection in Blueseed’s immediate future.


40 posted on 03/16/2013 11:58:46 AM PDT by Tallguy (Hunkered down in Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson