Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Portman’s Reversal on Gay Marriage Sparks Harsh Words from Conservatives
Newsmax ^ | Friday, 15 Mar 2013 10:05 PM | Todd Beamon

Posted on 03/16/2013 11:23:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Sen. Rob Portman on Friday became the first Republican in the Senate to support gay marriage—and his switch set off harsh words from many conservatives. …

Some conservatives charged that Portman’s reversal was timed with gay-marriage advocates to coincide with the Supreme Court hearings. “There is a concerted effort to pick off Republicans and make us appear divided,” Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage told NPR at CPAC. The group is trying to stop efforts to legalize gay marriage. …

Meanwhile, former Sen. Rick Santorum told Newsmax that the GOP must remain firm on its support of traditional marriage. … And Kyle Kondik, a political analyst and former Ohio resident who now works at the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics in Charlottesville, predicted that Portman’s revelation may not be the last for Republicans. …

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cpac; homosexualagenda; portman; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Longbow1969
I no longer invite liberal friends and relatives to my house nor do I accept and invitation to theirs....They were given every opportunity to leave their politics at home but chose to keep shooting their idiots mouths off....while I haven't formally told them to but out I believe the message is beginning to dawn on them. Your advice on not talking politics with them can only works if they cooperate which they will not. It's been a couple of years now and I don't miss them ...truth is their absence has made my life richer!!
21 posted on 03/16/2013 12:56:06 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is not a reversal. This is Portman coming out of the closet.


22 posted on 03/16/2013 1:01:38 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Margaret Thatcher would have said to him “Don’t go wobbly” but he did


23 posted on 03/16/2013 1:14:09 PM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing --- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

24 posted on 03/16/2013 1:17:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
This is not a reversal. This is Portman coming out of the closet.

I agree. He's the GOP's version of Jim McGreevey.
The "wife and family" thing is just a political prop.

25 posted on 03/16/2013 1:20:40 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I wish he had not brought up his faith and how he thought so hard about it. Then he attached himself to the Gospels about “Loving One Another” to justify his change of heart.

Jesus also said that belief in Him would cause families to go against one another. That is because belief in Jesus requires that a person follow him and not succumb to the world’s standards. The fate of one’s eternal soul demands it.

We should pray for Portman and his son. They apparently are under the impression that they are Christians and that what they are doing is a good thing as it is “charitable to allow people to be happy”. Well, is it charitable for a father to neglect telling his son about the need for the soul’s salvation?


26 posted on 03/16/2013 1:21:02 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

it is the meme of the left “christian” means “accept others walking all over you”

to the left mentioning christion is the their version of a cheat code.


27 posted on 03/16/2013 1:23:01 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

An extension of this is the parable of the prodigal son. The father didn’t go out looking for the son when the kid was wasting his inheritance on debauchery; it was when the son was beaten down and chastened by his poverty that resulted from his hard living, and was humble enough to go back to his father to even say that he would be happy just as a hired employee, that the father took him back. The father’s perspective was that before, his son was dead, and after the son repented, he was alive again.

Portman is coddling his son while in the dead state, and encouraging it.


28 posted on 03/16/2013 1:27:18 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Homosexuality isn't always to be attributed to a bad upbringing or poor fathering. It's rash to make such an accusation upon little or no evidence.

Portman is clearly in the wrong, but what we are given in the Gospel is a call to personal conversion, not an invitation to personal trashing.

29 posted on 03/16/2013 1:27:52 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Hitting it on the head~

Back in the good old days government ministers helped their relatives first. That's not the way it's supposed to be done these days

30 posted on 03/16/2013 1:47:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OKRA2012

you mean turning your own kid into a homosexual to protect yourself from leftwingtard socio-politcal criticism? (/s)


31 posted on 03/16/2013 1:56:44 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ontap
They were given every opportunity to leave their politics at home but chose to keep shooting their idiots mouths off

That's something different. What you are describing is people making it a point to attack your views and beliefs.

32 posted on 03/16/2013 1:59:50 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
At the very least he should have disowned him.

A very un-Christian attitude. Didn't Jesus himself teach us to hate the sin, but love the sinner? Can't do that by removing them from our lives, can we? How about we just love our kids who don't necessarily live as we would prefer. We don't have to reward their behavior, just simply let them know that we don't agree with it, but we love them anyway.

Who knows, someday, they may decide that THEY don't like their behavior, and if they know that their parents still love them, regardless, they may return, repentant. Isn't that what the parable of the Prodigal Son was all about?

I think Portman thinks that if he doesn't support his son's lifestyle, his son may think he doesn't love him. Too bad he didn't make the distinction of loving the sinner, but hating the sin.

33 posted on 03/16/2013 2:05:46 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

If I am not mistaken, the marriage license began as a mechanism to keep whites from marrying outside of their race.


34 posted on 03/16/2013 2:06:43 PM PDT by eaglescout1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

We are all sinners.


35 posted on 03/16/2013 2:21:51 PM PDT by LifeComesFirst (http://rw-rebirth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Okay, that made me smile.


36 posted on 03/16/2013 2:24:11 PM PDT by LifeComesFirst (http://rw-rebirth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I’m sorry you’re so full of hate.

TC


37 posted on 03/16/2013 2:33:23 PM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Glad to see somebody else gets it.


38 posted on 03/16/2013 4:18:51 PM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising.... Civil War II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ontap

If you can’t change the people around you, change the people around you.


39 posted on 03/16/2013 5:48:17 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: eaglescout1998
you are mistaken ~ a marriage license is just an adjunct to a process called CIVIL REGISTRATION ~ the US was later in adopting it than most countries ~ the French Revolution really pushed the idea in Europe and Scandinavia.

Much of the world has yet to adopt it.

Previously churches served as the places to register births, deaths, marriages, etc.

40 posted on 03/16/2013 7:52:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson