Posted on 03/16/2013 11:25:04 PM PDT by lionstar
Zero is not talking about LNG to power vehicles either.
Zero is under the delusion that we can power a rollerskate with a couple of “D” cell alkaline batteries and get it to drive acros the country with a 1000lbs of adults in the passenger compartment.
Why? Because Obama says so. It’s for our own good.
Can’t charge batteries without electricity,but no coal plants, no nuclear plants... where is this magical energy coming from idiot?
Meanwhile, in Saudi Arabia:
“A study from the International Energy Agency last year predicted that by 2020, U.S. oil production will outstrip that of OPEC’s de facto leader, Saudi Arabia.”
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2013/03/13/energy-journal-opec-acknowledges-u-s-oil-threat/
But who ya gonna believe...Obama, or your own lyin’ eyes?
How dare you! do you know how much water that will waste by people having to the panels clean!/s
You can this ideal is from a person who has ever set foot on a construction site.
Why? Because Obama says so. It’s for our own good.
Leave the coal and oil where it is.
Spend money on windmill cronies instead.
It depends is what kind of mood the Takers are in, which usually runs in parallel with their EBT Card balance.
I can imagine an Obama car with a mast and sails, solar panels, a small engine running on $10/gallon biofuels and pedals for when all of the above aren’t working. Within easy reach are vehicles that run on abundant, clean natural gas, however, the global warming cultists will still have a fit because they would emit that evil CO2.
Or 50,000 lbs of freight on an 18-wheeler.
Guitar strings? Nipples and Binkies?
I don’t see the compressed air thing working very well,since storage and distance are a problem.
Though compressed air certainly can perform powerful work.
LOL!!!
“so that means the only viable generation source for that much electric power is nuclear.
Somehow I don’t see the greens going for that one, not that they’re known for actually thinking anything through to that extent.”
Actually, some of them have, in a big way. I think that many of the objections to our PRESENT nuclear power are valid - but we’ve learned a lot in 60 years, and if that was applied, nuclear would be safe, clean, and available very long-term (possibly hundreds of years), during which time SOMEONE is going to figure out fusion power.
My previous post in no way implies any support for the goof who is the subject of this thread.
Unless under the pressure of war, the government has an extremely poor track record on throwing money at a problem and producing good, or sometimes any, results.
tarp bailout, i meant.
Envisioning = Stoned
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.