Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT's Weisman Wonders Why GOP Won't Just Capitulate After Obama Win: "What Are Elections For?"
NewsBusters.org ^ | March 18, 2013 | Clay Waters

Posted on 03/18/2013 2:08:50 PM PDT by Kaslin

Betraying his impatience with the Republican Party's insistence that President Obama cut spending, New York Times political reporter Jonathan Weisman sounded shocked that the GOP wasn't simply surrendering its principles in the wake of Obama's four–point victory last November, in Monday's "Republicans Determined To Press On With Air, If Not Vote, of Confidence." (Nice flattering photo of Paul Ryan, by the way.)

A year ago this month, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin stood on the floor of the House and declared that the ideals of small government, privatized health care and rigorous spending discipline captured in the budget plan about to pass the House would and should be central to the 2012 election campaign.

Then he and Mitt Romney lost -- Mr. Ryan’s home state, every swing state but North Carolina, and 332 electoral votes. Democrats locked down control of the Senate, which they had once been expected to lose, and chipped away at the Republicans’ House majority, sending the Republican Party into a round of soul-searching that persists today -- everywhere, it seems, but on Capitol Hill.

In Congress, Republicans are pushing an agenda that is almost identical to the one that their party lost with in November, with no regrets and few efforts to reframe it even rhetorically. The House will vote this week on the third iteration of Mr. Ryan’s budget, which would again try to turn Medicare into a subsidy for private insurance purchases, slash the top income tax rate and cut deeply into programs the president campaigned to protect.

On the Sunday political talk shows, a few conciliatory words from rank-and-file Republicans were all but drowned out by the resolute tone of Republican Congressional leaders. Mr. Boehner said on the ABC News program “This Week” that Mr. Obama had harvested the fruits of his election victory on Jan. 1, with a deal that allowed tax rates to rise on annual income over $450,000. That covered a smaller group than the $250,000 threshold the president campaigned on.

"The president got his tax hikes on January the first,” Mr. Boehner said. “The talk about raising revenue is over. It’s time to deal with the spending problem.”

Republicans in the House and Senate are standing firmly in the way of Mr. Obama’s second-term agenda, with a message that is striking when set against the results of an election just four months ago: Mr. President, you have to come to us.

Representative Lynn Jenkins of Kansas, a member of the House Republican leadership, emerged from a closed-door meeting with Mr. Obama last week and declared, “I’m encouraged to have heard from the president today, but more encouraged that perhaps this is an indication he is willing to change course.”

Which raises the question: What are elections for?

“Continuing to double down on policies that have been firmly rejected by the American people flies in the face of everything the Republican Party said they would do in the aftermath of losing the popular vote for the fifth time in the last six elections,” said Dan Pfeiffer, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama.

Of course, Republican lawmakers interpret the last election differently. “I think they are claiming too much of a mandate,” said Senator John Hoeven, Republican of North Dakota. “Number one, it was a close presidential election. Number two, the Republicans won the House, and they can lay claim to the same mandate. So to me, that’s a wash.”

That turn of phrase, "Of course, Republicans see it differently," is a common formulation for the Times when it wants to portray the GOP position dismissively, as an unnecessary afterthought.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2012presidential; budget; congress; jonathanweisman; newyorkslimes

1 posted on 03/18/2013 2:08:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You mean like how the Democrats caved to Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, both Bushes and Ike? What a laff.


2 posted on 03/18/2013 2:11:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is congress for then? Just get rid of it and have an emperor.


3 posted on 03/18/2013 2:15:12 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Cant speak for the GOP, but most Conservatives I know,
dont do as liberals are so prone to:

Bow down, or bend over for whomever appears to hold the whip hand.
4 posted on 03/18/2013 2:16:12 PM PDT by 45semi (A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mr.Weisman, true Patriots never surrender their Country!


5 posted on 03/18/2013 2:17:23 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Every Republican in Congress won, too.


6 posted on 03/18/2013 2:18:07 PM PDT by des
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I told my liberal cousin the day Obama was elected that I would treat him EXACTLY like the left treated Bush for 8 years..than he quickly shut his pothole


7 posted on 03/18/2013 2:18:16 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave already thinks he is


8 posted on 03/18/2013 2:18:22 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, like that


9 posted on 03/18/2013 2:18:59 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sure, Mr. Obama should be able to get all he wants legislatively because he won the election.

Congress should be declared null and void because Mr. Obama
won the election.

The Supreme Court should be disbanded because Mr. Obama won the election.

State and local governments should be considered extraneous
because Mr. Obama won the election and he should be able to run everything because he won the election.

See? Ya know?

/s/

IMHO


10 posted on 03/18/2013 2:19:29 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is a great little indicator of leftist insanity these days. Someone should write a book on the subject of where the leftist mind has actually gone since King Obama took the throne. They’ve really lost it. If McCain or Romney would have won can you imagine the meltdown?


11 posted on 03/18/2013 2:21:03 PM PDT by toddausauras (FUBO x 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Another Democrat who envies the power held by one party rule in Red China.


12 posted on 03/18/2013 2:21:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Go ahead GOP.

You gave up on Conservatism very publicly today.

Just spend.

Be Cyprus.


13 posted on 03/18/2013 2:23:46 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

NYslimes: "GIVE UP. GIVE UP. GIVE UP."

14 posted on 03/18/2013 2:24:34 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is what you get with a journalism degree these days?

This idiot doesn't even understand the 3 branches of gov'ment.

15 posted on 03/18/2013 2:29:14 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yeah; just like the Democrats did when Bush was re-elected?

ROFL

16 posted on 03/18/2013 2:33:02 PM PDT by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: des

Exactly. I might ask what House elections are for. I’m sure lefties’d be pleased as punch if there were just one big election, a sorta national plebescite granting all power to one party or another. But we’re not setup for that. Plus, it’s a horrific idea.


17 posted on 03/18/2013 2:48:38 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Which raises the question: What are elections for? "

Ask Mr Weisman what he said the day after GW Bush was inaugurated in January 2001. No doubt he and his friends in the liberal media were saying, "we have to destroy this President; let's keep recounting the ballots in Florida."

18 posted on 03/18/2013 2:53:35 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

after 20 years in the senate feinstein STILL does not understand seperation of powers. the NYT is too busy trying to use junk reporting to create junk science to support a homosexual gene.

It is the NYC disease.

BTW when did NYC become a city of wimps?


19 posted on 03/18/2013 2:57:01 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tom h

Most likely


20 posted on 03/18/2013 2:58:29 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t fret Mr. Weisman, the GOP is surrendering it’sprinciples as fast as it can.


21 posted on 03/18/2013 3:03:18 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: des

“Every Republican in Congress won, too!”

Seems they forget about that fact.


22 posted on 03/18/2013 3:31:56 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Debbie you ignorant slut.


23 posted on 03/18/2013 3:37:55 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I predict the exact same Freepers will hate the GOP Candidate for: 2016,2020,2024,2028, 2032.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane; des
Exactly. I might ask what House elections are for. I’m sure lefties’d be pleased as punch if there were just one big election, a sorta national plebescite granting all power to one party or another. But we’re not setup for that. Plus, it’s a horrific idea.

No they only consider it valid if the plebecite gives all power the the DemocRAT party. They'd consider it invalid if a plebecite gave any or all power to the Republican party.

24 posted on 03/18/2013 8:35:19 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Romney and Ryan didn’t run on the issues the republicans are once again talking about.


25 posted on 03/18/2013 8:40:47 PM PDT by Terry Mross (This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
NYT's Weisman Wonders Why GOP Won't Just Capitulate After Obama Win: "What Are Elections For?"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2998096/posts
"'Autopsy' Is the Right Word: RNC Releases Report on Party's Future"

Looks to me like Weisman hasn't been paying attention.

26 posted on 03/18/2013 8:45:49 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley
"I see what you did there!"

Oh, yes, we should just capitulate everything, lay down and die.

Like your post.

27 posted on 03/19/2013 5:29:26 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ripley
"I see what you did there!"

Oh, yes, we should just capitulate everything, lay down and die.

Like your post.

28 posted on 03/19/2013 5:30:18 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Jonathan Weisman should pay closer attention to reality.

John Boehner won


29 posted on 03/19/2013 5:33:07 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Sorry for the burp post....hummingbird dragging *ss this morning!


30 posted on 03/19/2013 5:33:14 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
What is congress for then? Just get rid of it and have an emperor.

I don't know if you've been tuned in, but Congress has been giving away its powers (our powers, actually - that's what "representative" means) since 1913.

The abolition of this toothless, powerless talking shop cannot be far off.

31 posted on 03/19/2013 5:36:02 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

“Oh, yes, we should just capitulate everything, lay down and die.”

There you have it comrade! That was our objective and it is working out rather well, da?

/s/

IMHO


32 posted on 03/19/2013 8:48:09 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson