Skip to comments.
Graham calls for boots on the ground in Syria
CBS News ^
| March 19, 2013
| Lucy Madison
Posted on 03/19/2013 2:17:43 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
To: ColdOne
“Why not you and McCain first?”
Yeah, these two bastards are alway willing to let someone else’s children in our military give up their lives for another ME $h!thole!! Enough of this crap! With the exception of Israel, if they all managed to kill each other the world would be an infinitely better place.
To: Colonel Kangaroo
No blood for ... well for bugger all actually. There isn’t even oil there.
If sending in the troops would ensure than neither side won — then, maybe it would be worth it. If you have to pick a side, how do you tell which is the least bad side?
To: ColdOne
Amen Brother: Send these two a-holes over, and see how they like it.
We could send them over in a two seater plane that McCain could crash just outside the sites.
63
posted on
03/19/2013 3:52:20 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Colonel Kangaroo
Completely agree with McCain permanent butt attachment Graham....
By all means send in US troops as long as Graham leads them..../ S
64
posted on
03/19/2013 3:59:26 PM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Colonel Kangaroo
Completely agree with McCain permanent butt attachment Graham....
By all means send in US troops as long as Graham leads them..../ S
65
posted on
03/19/2013 3:59:26 PM PDT
by
JZoback
To: Colonel Kangaroo
Short of Nuking Iran, I don’t see me supporting ANY war while Obama and the democrats are in power.
66
posted on
03/19/2013 4:25:12 PM PDT
by
Gator113
( ~just keep livin~)
To: reg45
Aren’t these the same weapons of mass destruction that disappeared from Iraq during the Second Gulf War? The ones that Saddam “never had”.
Funny how that will never come up in the Marxist®Media
To: Colonel Kangaroo
68
posted on
03/19/2013 5:54:39 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Colonel Kangaroo
69
posted on
03/19/2013 6:25:57 PM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: Colonel Kangaroo
Saddam’s chemical weapons that went to Syria? There is no such thing, Lindsay!!
70
posted on
03/19/2013 7:05:12 PM PDT
by
jch10
(Hey GOP! Only Conservatives get my vote.)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
We’ve been through this a million times. Everyone knows that Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass destruction. sarc
71
posted on
03/19/2013 10:13:54 PM PDT
by
Terry Mross
(This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
To: ALASKA
Hopefully we could eliminate the stockpiles without war, but one way or the other, we have to secure it. There are stockpiles of chemical WMD all over the Middle East. And one of the nations loaded with WMD stockpiles, Egypt, is currently being run by a terrorist organization (Muslim Brotherhood). So.....
The cat is out of the bag.
The horse has left the barn.
Time to get the cobwebs out of the bunker.
To: Colonel Kangaroo
This guy Graham is a nutcake.
To: ALASKA
Widespread release of sarin can kill thousands. Hopefully we could eliminate the stockpiles without war, but one way or the other, we have to secure it.Agreed.
In five years or so, let's go in and secure any that may be left.
To: Red Badger
75
posted on
03/20/2013 1:08:21 AM PDT
by
Squantos
( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
I would like to know why our ME policy has shifted from taking out the really bad guys to supporting the really bad guys. Of course ... the guy in the whiteHut, grahamnesty, and mcinsane are forty times smarter than the average Military General. Why be on the right side (or a better side, there is no good side) when the guy in the whiteHut, grahamnesty, and mcinsane know it is best for America to be on the wrong side? Besides, why is syria important to America? Did someone say chemical weapons? Good ... let them use them there and there will be less chemical weapons. But the chemical weapons part has to be a lie. The lame-stream drive bys have said there are no chemical weapons in that region. Heard the lame-stream drive bys say it since prior to iraq and the lame-stream drive bys never lie nor does the guy in the whiteHut, grahamnesty, and mcinsane. It would be delusional to think there are chemical weapons in the region. Our leaders have to be delusional to not believe the lame-stream drive bys.
76
posted on
03/20/2013 1:34:48 AM PDT
by
no-to-illegals
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
"I don't care what it takes....."
77
posted on
03/20/2013 1:36:35 AM PDT
by
devolve
( -- -- God created men - Sam Colt made them equal --- Shoot low boys! - Skeeter is riding a pig! --)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
Let’s first clarify what really happened in Benghazi. Finish the impeachments and then consider Mr. Graham’s proposal.
78
posted on
03/20/2013 2:46:53 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
His boots, first and last. Grab a weapon, son. Let us see it, JAG boy.
To: 1010RD
"Let’s first clarify what really happened in Benghazi. Finish the impeachments and then consider Mr. Graham’s proposal."
Well, since we were running weapons to the Islamists fighting Assad, maybe including chemical weapons, that could be awkward...
80
posted on
03/20/2013 3:02:50 AM PDT
by
Truth29
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson