Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There's a Chuck U video at the source.
1 posted on 03/20/2013 2:43:15 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: neverdem

The D.C. Circuit is not the “Tenth Circuit.” The Tenth Circuit covers Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah.


2 posted on 03/20/2013 2:47:57 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Go ahead. Pack the courts with leftists. They can’t protect all of them.


3 posted on 03/20/2013 2:48:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The last thing I want to do is watch Chuck U. BTW, if I win Lotto/Powerball tonight I am out of NY so fast....


4 posted on 03/20/2013 2:56:17 PM PDT by Shady (Libya shows us how Americans rate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“And third, they have ruled that recess appointments couldn’t be taken into account," said Schumer. "Why did they do that?

To rescue what little remains of our Constitution.

5 posted on 03/20/2013 2:57:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie ("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If Chucky wasn’t such an idiot and liar he’d be dangerous.


6 posted on 03/20/2013 3:00:06 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Don’t you just love career politicians, telling those who elected them what do do...


7 posted on 03/20/2013 3:03:30 PM PDT by JamesA (You don't have to be big to stand tall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
But Sharon Angle was unacceptable. /s
10 posted on 03/20/2013 3:33:16 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Schmukky Chucky Chumer,

What can you expect from a meshugana retard like this?


13 posted on 03/20/2013 4:43:42 PM PDT by ConradofMontferrat (According to mudslymz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

this guy Schumer....is such a...a...a democRAT.

I have turned the word democRAT into a pejorative. Now when I want to islut someone I say to them...you’re such a democRAT.


14 posted on 03/20/2013 5:10:29 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Obama has turned America into an aristocracy of the unaccomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
There's a special place in hell for Chuck U and Cuomo the younger.

OK pubbies, grow a spine and some testicles. Remember Miguel Estrada, Priscilla Owen, Charles W. Pickering, Carolyn Kuhl, David W. McKeague, Henry Saad, Richard Allen Griffin, William H. Pryor, William Gerry Myers III and Janice Rogers Brown.

New York State Sets Up Gun Snitch Line With $500 Award

The Annulment of Same-sex Marriage

THE HOCKEY STICK, BROKEN AGAIN

Matt Ridley on How Fossil Fuels are Greening the Planet (video)

Ocean plankton suck up twice the carbon we thought they did

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

15 posted on 03/20/2013 5:29:29 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If the “Rule Change” is a talking filibuster, rather than threatened filibuster being able to prevent up or down votes, whats the downside? this will hurt the dem’s when they inevitably fall below 50 Senators. Not sure they have the brass to do this, or they would have rammed it through the first day of the new Session.


16 posted on 03/20/2013 6:36:38 PM PDT by AnAmericanInEngland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Our strategy will be to nominate four more people for each of those vacancies [on the 10th Circuit Court].

WHen did Chuck Schumer become President?

18 posted on 03/20/2013 7:50:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Has anybody asked Schumer why Estrada, and countless of other picks by George W. Bush, weren’t allowed an up or down vote?


19 posted on 03/20/2013 8:55:59 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“They just rejected on specious grounds a fine New Yorker...

Of course. The Republicans never have a good, principled reason for anything they do. It's always just petty politics. Projection much?

I'd love to meet this guy in an alley.

21 posted on 03/20/2013 9:44:59 PM PDT by Steve1789 (I miss having a president who loves this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“We Will Change the Rules to...”

1. Any conservative who can relocate is needed in Texas to help offset their plan of creating a permanent voting bloc of illegal aliens with that “One stroke of the pen, law of the land” crap. Once we lose Texas’ electoral votes, it’s over for all of us.

2. The Socialist propensity for “changing the rules” is why any further discussion of the “eligibility” of Cruz, Rubio, et al is ridiculous. That ship has left the harbor. That plane has taken off. (Insert favorite euphemism here). WHY on earth should we continue to “play by the rules” with our sanctimonious little heads held high while our mortal enemies are trying to slit our throat?


23 posted on 03/21/2013 4:53:29 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I do not believe in the filibuster, so I'm OK with it going away.

If the Democrats insist on packing the court with ideological partisans, then the next time conservatives have the presidency + the Senate, then they can do the same.

And, with majorities in both Houses + the Presidency and no filibuster, they can change the number of Scotus justices to suit their needs.

Economic regulation again appeared before the Supreme Court in the Gold Clause Cases.[39] In his first week after taking office, Roosevelt closed the nation's banks, acting from fears that gold hoarding and international speculation posed a danger to the national monetary system. He based his actions on the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917.[40] Congress quickly ratified Roosevelt's action with the Emergency Banking Act. A month later, the President issued Executive Order 6102, confiscating all gold coins, bullion, and certificates, requiring they be surrendered to the government by May 1, 1933 in exchange for currency. Congress also passed a joint resolution cancelling all gold clauses in public and private contracts, stating such clauses interfered with its power to regulate U.S. currency.

While the Roosevelt administration waited for the court to return its judgment, contingency plans were made for an unfavorable ruling.[41] Ideas circulated within the White House to withdraw the right to sue the government to enforce gold clauses.[41] Attorney General Cummings suggested the court should be immediately packed to ensure a favorable ruling.[41] Roosevelt himself ordered the Treasury to manipulate the market to give the impression of turmoil, although Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau refused.[41] Roosevelt also drew up executive orders to close all stock exchanges and prepared a radio address to the public.[41]

On February 18, 1935, the Justices' decisions in all three cases were announced; all supported the government's position by a narrow 5–4 majority.[41] Chief Justice Hughes wrote the opinion for each case, finding the government had plenary power to regulate money. As such, the abrogation of both private and public contractual gold clauses was within congressional reach when such clauses represented a threat to Congress's control of the monetary system.[41] Speaking for the Court in the Perry case, Hughes's opinion was remarkable: in a judicial tongue-lashing not seen since Marbury v. Madison,[42] Hughes chided Congress for an act which, while legal, was regarded as clearly immoral.[36] However, Hughes ultimately found the plaintiff had no cause of action, and thus no standing to sue the government.[43]


24 posted on 03/21/2013 5:14:47 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Bush’s fault!

Dead Red Ted Kennedy is smiling in his grave.


25 posted on 03/21/2013 5:53:26 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Estrada.


26 posted on 03/21/2013 5:55:09 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Anyone that Chuck Schumer likes is probably unfit to sit on the bench.


28 posted on 03/21/2013 6:04:58 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Senator Charles Schumer takes a stroll down a Manhattan street.

29 posted on 03/21/2013 7:16:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson