Why would anything trust anything written by Sidney Blumenthal, who is tied to the Clintons by Krazy Glue?
How does anyone know is this isn’t just classic misinformation to clear Hillary, as if that was possible?
Besides, at this point in time what possible difference does it make?
Right, Cankles?
There were many noxious twits during the Clinton Era (Carville, Begala, Lanny Davis) but Bloomie had to be #1.
exactly
Sidney Blumenthal??? WTH is a Sidney Blumenthal?
He is a aniveling obsequious arrogant little Uriah-Heep who pitifullly hangs onto the Clintons’ tightie whities as if he is relevant to them. WTH does he get his “intelligence” access? Cleaning out Sandy Berger’s sock drawer?
the “video” excuse has pretty much been credibly shown to be a disinformation attempt directed by the obamites to make the US look like we are at fault for the idiot muslims going postal on us and our allies
the fact that the Consulate attack was an al Qaeda operation, and based on inside help and with the priot knowledge of the so-calleed Libyan security force, was known as it was going down
“How does anyone know is this isn’t just classic misinformation to clear Hillary...?” - E82
That is exactly how I read these. I think it should be everyone’s first assumption. (Total misinformation with intent to rehab Hilliary)
My BS detector is off the charts.
Team Clinton has 2 years to make America think she didn’t royally screw up
Me thinks we’re seeing some historical verification for the upcoming Hillary run for office...
And how is it that attack hack Sid Blumenthal has "sources" high in the Libyan government as well as "the highest levels of European governments and Western Intelligence and security services"?
How is it that Sid's "sources" have anything to add the Secretary of State's own sources in these very institutions?
Why is Sid reporting to Hillary as an intelligence gatherer, rather than advising her on her political situation -- which is his area of expertise?
Why is there nothing sensitive or previously unknown (or imponderable) in these communications? Nothing that "clears" Hillary or "implicates" another party?
More questions than answers...
My thought as well, exit82.
Possible? - sure Probable? - pretty high, IMHO