Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes Ryan Budget, 221-207
Townhall.com ^ | March 21, 2013 | Guy Benson

Posted on 03/21/2013 2:22:50 PM PDT by Kaslin

The Republican-held House of Representatives has passed Paul Ryan's FY 2014 budget, as well as the final version of a "continuing resolution" that will fund the federal government through the end of the current fiscal year.  The latter item locked into place the reduced spending baseline established by the sequester.  It does not defund Obamacare, although the GOP FY 2014 budget does.  As I wrote earlier, the House rejected a trio of Democratic alternative budgets yesterday, including the Senate Democrats' offering -- which raises taxes by $1.5 trillion, increases overall spending, adds $7 trillion in new deficits and never balances.  Robust bipartisan majorities torpedoed all three resolutions.  The House Republican blueprint holds the line on taxes, reduces deficits by $4.6 trillion compared to the current path, and balances within ten years.  It passed on a mostly party-line vote, 221-207; every Democrat and a handful of Republicans voted no.  The GOP majority has complied with the law and passed a budget every year since gaining control of the House in the 2010 elections.  Senate Democrats shirked their legally-mandated budgetary duties for nearly four years, but are finally poised to pass a plan of their own in the coming days.  The president remains historically and unlawfully delinquent on his FY 2014 fiscal plan.  Here's Paul Ryan laying out the case for his latest proposal and contrasting it with Democrats' vision:
 

Paul Ryan: The House Delivers A Responsible, Balanced Budget

[President Obama] set a record this year: Two months with no plan, while we have trillion dollar deficits and a debt crisis on our horizon.  They have time for the attacks, but no time to offer serious solutions.   His party's leaders are unfortunately failing to offer a serious account of our challenge.  No serious plan to grow the economy or create jobs.  No plan to ever balance the budget.  Take more -- trillions of dollars more --  to spend more in Washington.  That's what got us in this mess in the first place."


Over on the Senate side, they're in the midst of a "vote-a-rama," in which each party is guaranteed 25 hours of debate on the majority's budget resolution.  This allows Senate Republicans to introduce a slew of amendments and force tough votes; Democrat Senators will have nowhere to hide.  This, by the way, is precisely the reason why Democrats flouted the law and refused to produce budgets for the last three-plus years.  They didn't want to expose themselves to uncomfortable votes, preferring instead to attack the other side's solutions.  This year their pay is contingent upon producing a budget, so they've cobbled one together.  So far, Democrats have already killed an amendment that would have restored funding to facilitate White House tours for school groups.  Apparently the resources associated with those sequester cuts just aren't fungible.  (Remember, the president threatened to veto a Republican plan that would have afforded him increased flexibility on this stuff.  He has since blamed a series of unpopular-by-design cuts on the fact that his "hands are tied").  Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions has also offered an amendment requiring Democrats to produce a plan -- any plan -- that would balance their budget within ten years.  That's also expected to go down in flames, likely along strict party lines.  Sen. Pat Toomey Orrin Hatch is also expected to advance an amendment that would repeal Obamacare's harmful medical device tax, which has bipartisan support.  Your move, Dems. I'm told the Senate budget debate could continue long into the night, or might bleed over into tomorrow, depending on how Harry Reid manages the schedule.  If you're interested in watching these events unfold in real time, you can click back and forth between the hoops tourney and C-SPAN 2.  


UPDATE - Unsurprisingly, Senate Democrats have been assailing the House-passed budget as brutally austere and devastating to children and the elderly.  This "monstrous" plan increases federal spending by an average of 3.4 percent per year, saves Medicare, and balances.  The Democrat plan accelerates spending beyond the current rate of increase of nearly five percent annually, keeps Medicare on its death march and never balances -- all despite a hefty tax hike.


UPDATE II - On a tangentially related note, Reuters is now reporting that sequester-related unemployment predictions were likely overblown.  I'm shocked.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2014budget; houserepublicans; paulryan; senatedemocrats

1 posted on 03/21/2013 2:22:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

well thats just awesome


2 posted on 03/21/2013 2:36:16 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (I'll surrender my guns alright - bullets first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Looks like the House GOP found that missing backbone.

Too bad they didn’t find it when Obamacare first came up when it was really needed.

Day late and a dollar short.


3 posted on 03/21/2013 2:48:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
News Flash The rats controlled all three houses when 0bamaCare came up and was passed. Or did you forget that?
4 posted on 03/21/2013 3:17:34 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen

So who are the ten republicans who jumped sides and voted against it?


5 posted on 03/21/2013 3:33:40 PM PDT by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Looks like the House GOP found that missing backbone.

The GOP passed the Ryan budget in 2012 too - and that was going into an election.

Also, Obamacare was passed through the House when the Democrats controlled it.

6 posted on 03/21/2013 3:34:26 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The gop house passed the Ryan budget before also.

They have had a backbone before this but you won’t hear it from either the left OR right wing media outlets.


7 posted on 03/21/2013 4:25:02 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Also, Obamacare was passed through the House when the Democrats controlled it.

And with zero Republican votes in either House or Senate IIRC. Rats own it.

8 posted on 03/21/2013 5:09:51 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen

Let’s see-—

We have a continuing resolution for funding until end of Sept this year. That vote
REDUCES further the number of border patrol agents.

At the same week, Obama names 5 new “MONUMENTS” in the USA.

What $$$ will be used for them?

Already, Yosemite is threatening to end raft/horse/bike rentals in that park.

We are being hit from every direction with crap. Apparently the fan is getting really busy.


9 posted on 03/22/2013 8:55:53 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen

Biden’s hotel bill for a night in Paris==$585,000!!!!

This is sequestration???

Is there any line the Denocrats in power won’t cross???\


10 posted on 03/22/2013 9:14:34 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

A few are from swing districts but most said it didn’t cut deep enough. You can read more here...
http://www.nationaljournal.com/blogs/hotlineoncall/2013/03/ten-house-gopers-vote-against-ryan-s-budget-21


11 posted on 03/22/2013 12:48:11 PM PDT by Shugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

Sorry, forgot to include the names...

Those Rs voting against the budget this year were: Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Paul Broun (Ga.), Rick Crawford (Ark.), Randy Forbes (Va.), Chris Gibson (N.Y.), Phil Gingrey (Ga.), Joe Heck (Nev.), Walter Jones (N.C.), Tom Massie (Ky.) and David McKinley (W.Va.).

from this url:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/21/10-house-republicans-vote-against-ryan-budget/


12 posted on 03/22/2013 12:55:45 PM PDT by Shugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson