I think we agree but I could not tell completely.
This would also mean that the government cannot rewrite the definition.
This is an establishment of religion, It means what religion says it means.
Non religious may face some sort of paradox here but they should construct their own group sense of partnering.
Ah, but the religious will face one, too. They are quite happy to have the government legislate in favor of traditional marriage: tax law, insurance law, etc..
Many of the religious -- supporters of the Constitution to a one, no doubt -- may find they don't care much for a truly dispassionate federal government.