Posted on 03/22/2013 7:50:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
While it is nice for you to share your personal feelings with us, it sure isn’t relevant to the laws being changed and passed in America as marriage is being redefined.
I suspect the framers would find your approach queer.
Mentally ill sex perverts should not have a legal right to be heard in court.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
DaveyB said: The author is still operating under the presumption that the institution of marriage is a human convention and can be redefined legally by human agents. My presupposition is that marriage is instituted by an immutable creator.
Actually one can easily understand that marriage means a man and a woman even without religion. Biology and natural law also tell us the same thing. Biology and natural law also teach us that a mother is a woman and gives birth to children and a father is a man who inseminates a woman. And that children do not need a woman/mother and a man/father, but two or more sexual perverts can be the "parents". Fag "marriage" is an effort to overturn the very laws of nature and thus destroy human society by forcing everyone to accept the insane lie that a man can be a wife/mother and a woman can be a husband/father and thus nothing has any meaning at all. It's utter rebellion against reality, truth, natural law, God's law and human civilization. And just who is destroyed the most?
Children.
Anyone wanting on/off either list, FREEPMAIL me.
Well the first thing one ought do before advancing to activism, is to make sure what you believe is correct and ought be applied, and the second thing you should do is to make sure you know how to articulate it to others.
Now, if you have constructive suggestions for activism, I think they will be welcome, but that was not the subject of this particular discussion so far.
>> A very thoughtful discussion on a complex problem.
It’s not complicated.
Don’t pass law that forces the citizen to participate in, service, or otherwise support homosexual behavior.
Enough with the Catholic bashing.
LOL, Where did you find any Catholic bashing in that post, I would like to see what you see there.
Yeah my advice is to push for legal protection of marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.