Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Dakota to vote on amendment effectively banning abortions
Chicago Tribune ^ | 03/22/2013 | Michael Muskal

Posted on 03/22/2013 3:50:51 PM PDT by Viennacon

North Dakota lawmakers on Friday approved a state referendum for this fall on a constitutional amendment that, if passed, would effectively block abortion by holding that life begins at conception.

In a 57-35 vote, the House followed the Senate’s action and approved the referendum that now goes before the voters on the November ballot. Groups backing abortion rights said they will fight the referendum and, if needed, in the courts as well. The action is the latest in a series of moves by North Dakota lawmakers to limit and, in some cases, even eliminate abortions. Lawmakers have passed bills that would ban abortions six weeks after conception or after a fetal heartbeat is detected. A second measure would ban abortions because of genetic defects. Both bills now head to the governor, who has yet to say what he will do.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: abortion; ndbanabortions; ndoutlawabortions; northdakota; outlaw
I saw a thread on the ban against heartbeat abortions, but this one defines life at conception, the Personhood Bill. 'Looks like this is going to the Supreme Court after the governor signs it. (I think he will). 'Could be monumental.
1 posted on 03/22/2013 3:50:51 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
I think abortion will eventually be outlawed on the grounds that you can't own another human being. This is step one...and it comes down to chromosones.

Kinda makes the story of Solomon relevant. It's called Wisdom!!

2 posted on 03/22/2013 3:59:50 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Do you think that our soon to be entirely corrupt and sub intelligent sub-preening court will actually allow this?


3 posted on 03/22/2013 4:06:23 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Hope springs eternal.


4 posted on 03/22/2013 4:10:36 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I was reading somewhere (and people can correct me if I’m wrong) that although roe v wade made abortion legal, it also left it open to possible future legislation as the court said that science had not yet determined at what point a fetus became “human.” With the advancements in science since the 70s, I don’t know how anyone argue that life doesn’t begin at conception ( I actually I don’t understand how anyone could argue that in 70s either). You don’t even have to make this a religious argument... Pro-lifers are the ones with SCIENCE (the exact thing the left is always harping on about) on their side.


5 posted on 03/22/2013 4:12:19 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1

Are the “new” chromosonesequence present at conception? If so, it is the whole of the new person.


6 posted on 03/22/2013 4:47:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Shouldn’t abortion be a state’s choice? IMO it is and the SC should say so.


7 posted on 03/22/2013 5:45:43 PM PDT by jch10 (Hey GOP! Only Conservatives get my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

One guess is that personhood will be defined as the moment one can live without an umbilical core.


8 posted on 03/22/2013 6:09:51 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1
... it also left it open to possible future legislation as the court said that science had not yet determined at what point a fetus became “human.”

I hadn't realized that they forgot when a fetus "became human". I was born in '52 and back then they knew that when a human sperm met a human egg it would result in a human baby being implanted in the uterus.

9 posted on 03/23/2013 3:32:04 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: soycd
One guess is that personhood will be defined as the moment one can live without an umbilical core.

A good example of how they obfuscate things with words like "personhood" to try to ignore that the real issue is "life" and the murder of that life.

10 posted on 03/23/2013 3:33:56 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1

I’m sorry, but I can’t see any advantage to claiming that science is on our side. Science has become a discredited ideology that just produces liberals and other traitors.

I don’t look to science or scientists for my truth, sorry. Frankly, I think we can do better without them.


11 posted on 02/23/2014 3:00:57 PM PST by Sane View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson