1 posted on
03/23/2013 9:08:57 AM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Kaslin
36 posted on
03/23/2013 10:18:53 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Kaslin
What nobody has explained in public or on the news to my satisfaction, is why are all these sequestration “cuts” happening? I understood, and it has been confirmed through several news reports I’ve seen, that the sequester was not actual cuts to existing spending but were a reduction in the increase in future spending for this year and some years forward. And they were insignificant reductions in the increases at that. It’s comparable to your boss telling you that you were up for a $200 a month raise and then right before the raise was to start, he tells you sorry, but he can’t afford $200 a month for your increase. But he can afford $198 a month. Not a real big disappointment is it?
So why all this hand-wringing over “cuts” that were not supposed to be cuts anyway? What’s going on, besides politics as usual?
42 posted on
03/23/2013 10:57:46 AM PDT by
HotHunt
To: Kaslin
Somebody needs to check.
My quick look at the airports is that they are mostly in Republican districts.
43 posted on
03/23/2013 11:21:26 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
To: Kaslin
The Federal Aviation Administration on Friday told 149 regional airports across the country it would begin closing their air traffic control towers in April, but said it would spare another 40 towers that had been on the chopping block. The agency said the cuts are necessary to help meet $637 million in forced spending cuts. The tower closures will begin April 7 and will be phased in over four weeks, FAA Chief Operating Officer David Grizzle said in a memo obtained by CNN.
The cut that the FAA has is still MORE than what they had last year!!!
44 posted on
03/23/2013 11:26:21 AM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
To: Kaslin
How many of the airports affected have traffic sufficient to warrant a manned tower??
46 posted on
03/23/2013 12:56:06 PM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: Kaslin
The purpose is to kill people so he can then point his finger at the GOP and whine that they “have blood on their hands.”
48 posted on
03/23/2013 3:52:37 PM PDT by
Wordkraft
(Remember who the Collaborators are.)
To: Kaslin
It’s not only Barry throw up; it’s our Congress. They are letting him get away with literally murder.
51 posted on
03/23/2013 10:45:27 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Kaslin; ExTexasRedhead
for later read ........................................................................................... FRegards
54 posted on
03/24/2013 12:00:38 PM PDT by
gonzo
( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms ... FRegards)
To: Kaslin; nevergore; ExTexasRedhead
My ex-partner and I shot enough Touch-and-Goes at Elkhart, IN Municipal to keep the ATCs in business for an additional year back in the early 80's.
When they thanked us for it, I told them to thank Mike (ex-partner) - he's the one that can't fly right. He damned-near dumped our C177-RG into Lake Pontarchain!
I made my bones when I was a kid ......................................................................... FRegards
56 posted on
03/24/2013 1:47:25 PM PDT by
gonzo
( Buy more ammo, dammit! You should already have the firearms ... FRegards)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson