I’m already sick of Rand Paul. Would somebody just give the man a joint and a hooker already.
All we need is a nation of effed up potheads sitting home collecting welfare and unemployment checks their whole lives.
Rand is correct. A puff of some pot is on par with a swig of alcohol. One is morally acceptable in our society and one isn’t.. why the difference? Because Harry J. Anslinger wanted to increase the size of the Bureau of Narcotics in 1937, he used weed as a scare issue to increase his own prestige and the power of the Bureau... as conservatives, we should realize that a lot of this drug war stuff is just a bunch of statist propaganda to give reason for bigger bureaus. Meth heroin, the hard stuff.. I’m not for legalizing.. but pot?? We are making a black market out of a harmless substance.
To the GOP: Become the party of liberty or become irrelevant.
As far as George W. Bush's substance abuse is concerned, I think he **DID** get arrested for and convicted of drunk driving. Once that was discovered, it nearly cost him the 2000 election.
Rand Paul says a lot of good things, but then he goes off and says stuff that sounds a lot too much like his father.
102 posted on 3/24/2013 5:44:08 PM by Responsibility2nd: “You are a troll. But I've known that for months now. When you finally get a well-deserved zot - please read the comments that will follow. You'll see me among the gloaters.”
Look, we all know these things go in cycles. Free Republic used to ban Ron Paul supporters, sometimes zotting them on sight. I remember a Class of 1998 Freeper being zotted merely because he said he'd vote for Ron Paul.
Today Rand Paul is popular in some conservative circles and the Paulbots are coming back out of the woodwork.
Enjoy your reprieve, Paulbots. If Rand Paul starts acting like a responsible elected official, I'll be right out front defending your right to be considered a legitimate wing of the Republican Party. But if, as I suspect, the Rand Paul apple hasn't fallen far from the Ron Paul tree, it will only be a matter of time until the reprieve ends and the zots begin anew.
As far as I'm concerned, libertarians who advocate amorality and who don't support a strong defense are not conservatives but rather a cancer in our midst. On the other hand, libertarians who want to focus on issues of personal freedom and fiscal discipline while staying quiet on social issues and military issues are people I can work with, just as I'm happy to support decorated combat veterans who may not share my moral values but are otherwise solid conservatives.
People's positions take time to fully develop, and while Ron Paul is a known commodity, I'll give Rand Paul the benefit of the doubt so we can find out where he stands.
I oppose the war on drugs as much as anyone (apparently, we didn’t learn anything from Prohibition), but Rand picked bad examples to make his point. We’d be much better off had Bush and Obama both been in a prison cell instead of in the Oval Office.