Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IYAS9YAS

The problem there is proving it is a ‘gift’ as legally defined by the ATF. On various places on the ATF’s website, they use the ‘gift’ example in regards to a parent or legal guardian, not a third party. Example from this FFL training program.

http://www.atf.gov/training/firearms/ffl-learning-theater/episode-4.html

Remember also that the dealer agreed with this summation when they refused to complete the purchase as well. They felt Kelly was being deceptive in his intentions.


13 posted on 03/26/2013 10:21:17 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring
The problem there is proving it is a ‘gift’ as legally defined by the ATF. On various places on the ATF’s website, they use the ‘gift’ example in regards to a parent or legal guardian, not a third party. Example from this FFL training program.

Read the language of the instructions to 11.a. Right there in the example is Mr. Brown using his own money to buy a gun as a gift for Mr. Black. No familial relationship is mentioned, nor required, but third party is specifically mentioned in the instructions. The only issue is whether or not you know, or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from owning a firearm.

14 posted on 03/26/2013 10:26:38 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson