Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Despite offering free ID’s to legal voters, Democrats are - as always - screaming that this will suppress the votes of minorities and the poor. Apparently they feel their core constituents are either too stupid, too lazy, or are simply unwilling to get a free piece of identification. Since that’s the way they think, you can expect a court challenge to be filed in, oh, five or six minutes.
1 posted on 03/26/2013 1:46:49 PM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EXCH54FE
Despite offering free ID’s to legal voters, Democrats are - as always - screaming that this will suppress the votes of minorities and the poor. Apparently they feel their core constituents are either too stupid, too lazy, or are simply unwilling to get a free piece of identification. Since that’s the way they think, you can expect a court challenge to be filed in, oh, five or six minutes.

Actually, it's the one thing you forgot:

They can't cheat anymore.

And for a Democrat, that's just not fair!
2 posted on 03/26/2013 1:48:47 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

They KNOW their constiuents are stupid and poor...they WANT them, helll they CREATED them.....they also know that Democrats DO VOTE FRAUD quite well!!


3 posted on 03/26/2013 1:49:32 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

So how come the Democrats don’t scream and hold their breath until blue over the other 99% of transactions requiring an ID. They need it for their food stamp allocations right? As a start.


5 posted on 03/26/2013 1:51:35 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

And I strongly believe that we should disallow ANY election results from states that do not have believable voter ID.

Which would eliminate the results from the vast majority of our “blue” states...corrupt and sleazy as they are.


6 posted on 03/26/2013 1:53:32 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE; Perdogg

Yahoo!


8 posted on 03/26/2013 2:01:13 PM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Good...

I can't even buy cough syrup without I.D. ditto that some fertilizers etc etc etc. and they ask me nothing to vote?

They ask in the Detroit Burbs but not Detroit, IMHO that has to change.

9 posted on 03/26/2013 2:12:07 PM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
In the past two days, I've been required to show my "government photo ID" for checking in at my doctor's office; for using my credit card at Macys; for checking out a book at the library where I already have a card; for purchasing OTC sinus medicine at the drug store and for writing a check to pay for a license for my dog.

Liberals, namely the Democrat Party, tell me I'm "disenfranchised" if I'm required to show my photo ID to vote!

What about my doctor's office, the drug store, the library, city hall and Macy's, aren't I being disenfranchised at those places as well?

Where do I go to sue all those places, not to mention the art gallery, the transit authority, the airport, the movie theater, etc.?

Where's Obama to help when I really need him?

10 posted on 03/26/2013 2:19:32 PM PDT by zerosix (Native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
An Obama-appointed judge to overturn the law in 3...2...1
14 posted on 03/26/2013 3:33:40 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Personally, I think a universal background check should be required before voting. After all, when exercising your second amendment right you need to prove you are who you say you are and that is not an undue burden.


15 posted on 03/27/2013 10:57:19 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson